If it is worthless, then why do the "bees" use it? Contrary to belief they do have a purpose other than "looking tactical", and work well in some instances. That could have something to do with many of the best LRPRs in the world coming with them as standard equipment.Why! Mainly to appeal to the wannabees.
Doncha be laughin' at me...I'll use my mean internet face.LOL @ Maverick223.
Never really thought about it too much (or owned one), but you are very right. They do look nice and streamlined though.What I DON'T get is the "butter knife" bolt handle. It's got just about the opposite of any characteristics I could ever imagine wanting.
Accuracy. I am not saying that they are inaccurate, but without doing loads of work to them, there are much more accurate rifles available for less money.If speed is the issue, why not just use a 55-90+ year old Enfield?
They may have their purpose, but I think probably 75% of the people that have them, got them just for the looks.
It works well for me with my small fingers. Very easy to grasp and operate. I can see how people with longer digits may not like the "butter knife".What I DON'T get is the "butter knife" bolt handle. It's got just about the opposite of any characteristics I could ever imagine wanting.
Try one on a horse hunt using a saddle scabbard.Anyone who doesn't agree with this is fooling themselves.