Taurus 605 owners.

Status
Not open for further replies.

KevininPa

Member
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
1,773
Location
Lehigh Valley, Pa
I just got a new blued 605 in trade. I wrung it out with 100 .38s and 50 .357s. It performed well! Do you as owners feel that this revolver can take a steady diet of .357s or like the S&W 66, stick to .38s with the occasional .357s thrown in? Looking for your owner input. Thanks.
 
I have a 605SS. I shoot mostly .38 spl for economic reasons. I have no doubt it will handle all the .357's you'd care to shoot for home defense or self defense. .38's are cheaper to practice with and have less recoil.
 
I have yet to run any full house .357's through mine however, I have put some 158 gr. LSWC through it and found it comfortable to shoot. I would think that it would be along the same lines as the K Frame S&W's. A steady diet of high performance loads will cause metal fatigue after some time.

Wheeler
 
Taurus recommends 158gr ammo.
I have mine loaded with Buffalo Bore 158gr Tactical Short Barrel low recoil, low flash ammo. Tipped with Speer Gold Dot.

Tactical Short Barrel Lower Recoil Low Flash 357 Magnum Ammo - 158 gr. Speer JHC (1,100fps/M.E. 424 ft. lbs.) - 20 Round Box

Typical full power 357 magnum loads offer several tactical problems for use in self defense and duty applications, especially when used in the shorter/lighter revolvers that are typical of concealed, defensive and duty carry. First, the muzzle flash can be blinding, especially from short barrels. Second, felt recoil can be a life-threatening drawback if fast follow-up shots are required. Third, the level of report can be deafening and cause permanent hearing loss, especially if fired indoors.

All three Buffalo Bore Tactical Short Barrel loads address the above problems and make the 357 magnum ideal for concealed, defensive and duty carry in smaller revolvers.

Muzzle flash: These exciting new 357 magnum loads utilize a flash suppressed powder that will not blind you, should you need to drop the hammer in a low light situation. It is estimated that over 90% of all defensive civilian shootings in the U.S. happen in low light-that is when the criminal element is at work. Wouldn't it be horrible if you fired at an assailant, in the dark, to protect your family, only to find that you missed the bad guy and you are now blind due to your own muzzle flash? This is a scenario that has happened many times in the real world with the 357 magnum. Through the use of our non-canister, flash suppressed powder, the tactical problem of blinding muzzle flash is now greatly reduced with Buffalo Bore's new Tactical Short Barrel loads!

Recoil: Felt recoil is exacerbated by the use of shorter barreled, smaller framed, lighter weight 357 revolvers, typically used for concealed and duty carry. The new Buffalo Bore Tactical Short Barrel 357 loads are not the normal full power "barn burner", 357 magnum loads we make and as such, felt recoil is substantially reduced, although they remain very powerful. Hence, deadly, and faster follow-up shots are more possible.

Your ears: Most folks don't think of the level of "report" as being a problem during a life threatening/defensive shooting and that may be correct for the actual moment of conflict. However, to lose some of your hearing for the rest of your life, following the shooting incident, is unnecessary and undesirable. Full power 357 magnum ammunition is deafening, even more so when fired from short barrels and even worse if you are required to shoot from an enclosed area such as a vehicle or indoors. Buffalo Bore's Tactical Short Barrel 357 magnum loads are not as hard on your hearing as full power ammunition. Although the use of hearing protection is still desirable, if possible, when using this ammo.

For those who wish to carry a 357 magnum revolver for potential "conflict resolution", these new Buffalo Bore loads put an end to the "tactical" draw backs associated with our regular 357 magnum ammo. These loads are great for use in longer barreled firearms too.

Special Information Note: The below velocities were obtained from my personal, real world, factory stock, over the counter, (NOT TEST BARRELS) 357 magnum, revolvers. Also, note that the 6 inch Python, is considerably slower than the 4 inch S&W. This has nothing to do with barrel length. It is most likely a combination of differences in chamber/throat dimensions, barrel -cylinder gap, barrel internals, and forcing cone dimensions in the Python, versus the S&W. If the Python and the S&W had the same dimensions in their chamber/throats, barrel cylinder gap and forcing cone, the longer barreled Python would give much faster speeds. We have found that all of our Python test revolvers are much slower than our late model S&W revolvers of equal or even shorter barrel length.

We could have reduced the recoil, flash and blast even more by "watering down" these loads further than we did, but then you wouldn't have a real 357 magnum in your hands. So we looked for and found a balance between very powerful, fight stopping ammo that recoils and flashes much less than ours and some other makers, full power 357 loads. If we were to "water down" this "Tactical Short Barrel" 357 ammo any more, we would simply not manufacture it and suggest that you use our 38 SPL+P ammunition.

None of these loads caused crimp/bullet jump (in five shots) in my 12 OZ. Scandium S&W Model 340, but they did generate considerable felt recoil.


http://www.buffalobore.com/index.php?l=product_detail&p=105
 
Thanks everyone

Good input. I do appreciate it and am more than willing to accept any advice on grips, holsters or whatever.
 
I have Hogue grips on mine, they fill my hand better then stock grips. I carry it in a Don Hume JIT holster, which I like a lot and they're not expensive. This IMHO is a great carry package.
 
Taurus 605 ?

Like all of the J framed guns ,regardless of manufacturer, I would not shoot full 357 mags in this light of a framed gun even if the manufacturer says it's OK. Remember Smith had to bring out the ' L' framed series revolvers because the 357 loads were wearing out the Model 19's. It would take several years of service life to see how these new J framed guns are going to last. Personal load in my 605 is 125JHP +Ps. either Win. or UMC Rems. from Wally. Muzzel flash and noise are the other problems in 2" guns also.
 
My 605 lives in...

Good input. I do appreciate it and am more than willing to accept any advice on grips, holsters or whatever.


M605Rig.jpg

This is a Bianchi #5 "Black Widow".

http://www.bianchi-intl.com/product/Prod.php?TxtModelID=5

This is my pocket holster. A cheap ( $10 ) nylon rig that I bought off of e-bay!! I figure if a holster is gonna be in the pocket anyway, why get fancy!!! ;)

M605pocketRigsmall.jpg

My 605 was made in 2003.

Taurus1.jpg
 
denfoote

Are those the Taurus combat grips? Did you purchase those later, or did they come with it? And do they cover the back strap? Mine came with the boot style.
 
Are those the Taurus combat grips? Did you purchase those later, or did they come with it? And do they cover the back strap? Mine came with the boot style.

Those are the old style grips that USED to come on the 605!!
2003 was the last model year that came with those grips!!

I'm not sure if you can still get them from Taurus.

Hogue makes a similar grip.

http://www.hoguestore.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=569_2_26_58_380&products_id=3269

I got the bright idea to put boot grips on my first 605, some years back. (that revolver was sold to finance a gun for my wife) I bought another 605, this time wiser.

I transferred the Eagle Secret Service boot grips from my M85SSUL to the magnum gun.

I took the new set up to the desert and touched off a full house magnum round.

After my hand stopped bleeding, I went back home, patched myself up and proceeded to put the stock grips back on!! :eek:

I really don't know why Taurus went to boot grips for the 605!!! :banghead:
 
KevininPA

On the grips for 605's , the Hogue that denfoote gave the link for on his post is the right grip. I put this grip on my 605 and even though it's open backed it really makes a difference in the ease of shooting with the Plus P 38 Spec. loads!
 
My 605 is a stainless, ported, bobbed hammer DAO version. It came with the grips shown on Denfoote's revolver which are just big enough to let my pinkie come into play. I'm very happy with these grips and have no intention of changing them.

My holster is a Triple K 420-3 which is a pancake holster very like Denfoote's but leaves a bit of barrel sticking out the bottom. I can't remember where I got it. I'm a lefty and have a tendency to pick up nice looking holsters whenever I find a deal even if I don't currently have a firearm to match.

I have no doubt about its ability to handle full power .357 loads, but they are a bit of a handful in something this small. The recoil is not unmanageable and is actually kind of fun, but gets old pretty quick. My 6" S&W 686 is a much more comfortable platform for full house .357's
 
I conceal carry, almost everyday, a Model 605, All Titaniun (15oz) snub, .357Mag., Great pocket revolver and no problem from day one. I carry it loaded w/38SPL+P, 125gr. GDHP
 
I bought a 3" SS 605 in August 2008 and it has those same grips on it. I believe they put those on the 3" guns and the boot grips on the 2", but not sure.
I wrung mine out with everything up to 170 grain barnburners. Not too bad to shoot up thru the 145 gr Hornady 357 loads. I will play and practice with 38 Spls. and stoke it with Glasers or Gold Dots or 125gr SJHPs for defense.
I would not expect a compact sized revolver to stay tight on a diet of hot 357s.
Mine is quite accurate and fun to shoot. I installed Wolff Springs and smoothed the internals a little.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top