Tense Florida Traffic Stop with Firearms

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
905
I got pulled over tonight while traveling in Florida and I wanted to share the story with you. Thoughts and comments on the appropriate behavior of my party and the officers, as well as on the legality of the situation are welcome. Please excuse my confusion of past and present tense in the following account.

First things first, I was going over the speed limit outside of city limits. That was mistake #1. I was going about 60 in a 45 in an area where you can see the road turn to 65 about a block down the road. Two sheriff vehicles were hidden in the woods and I slowed it down a bit, but anticipated a stop. Sure enough, one of the sheriff vehicles got on the road and followed me for about half a minute before turning the lights on. I slowly pulled over to the side of the road.

Here is where my experience differs from routine traffic stops. I am accustomed to law officers advising the driver to stay in the vehicle. However, the officer used his loudspeaker to ask me to exit the vehicle and approach him. I was not sure I heard him correctly and slowly opened the door. I said "you want me to exit the vehicle?" and he said "sir, step out of the vehicle and approach my driver side door". I exited the vehicle and approach the officer. I smiled and asked the officer "how are you tonight?". The officer said "Sir, please sit on the hood of my car". I said "Ok" and sat on the hood of his car. The officer said "Why were you going fast?". I started to answer. The officer cut me off and said "stand up and look at me when you are talking to me, and keep your hands on the hood of the vehicle". I stood up and put my hands on the vehicle and looked at him and said "I suppose I anticipated the speed change and was just heading home, I realize I was going too fast". The officer then looked me up and down and said "are you armed?"...

I decided honesty was best in this case and said "Yes, sir". He said "where?". I said "in my right pocket". He said "what is it?" I said "a J frame". The officer said "are there any other weapons on you?" I replied "a knife... just a pocket knife". The officer said "are there any other weapons in the vehicle?" I replied "Yes, sir, my wife is likely carrying". The officer said "don't make any sudden movements, I'm calling in backup. Wait for my partner to arrive with your hands on the vehicle and then I'm going to disarm you". I said "is that necessary, sir?" He said "Yes, for my own safety". I said "Ok, although I did not legally have to disclose, I respect your position". The officer says, "are you permit holders?" I reply "yes, I can show you". The officer nods and says "If I saw you had a gun and you did not tell me, I would have pulled my gun on you".

We waited for the partner. A second patrol vehicle arrives. The officer walked behind me and took my S&W out of my pocket. His partner came and took my knife. They unloaded the weapon and put the bullets in the holster and the gun on the hood. The officer then says "Whats your wifes name?" I tell him. He says "I'm going to go disarm her". I say "I would prefer if you did not try to disarm my wife, she is just a passenger". The officer says "I have to watch out for our safety and I need to be in control of all weapons". I reply "shes not going to like that". The officer approached my vehicle and leaves me with his partner. His partner and I have some small talk. I mention how uncomfortable a duty belt is in a vehicle and he agrees. The partner is much more laid back than the first officer. I tell the partner that legally I have no duty to disclose and that I don't think its necessary for them to disarm us. The partner replies "if you don't want our weapons drawn on you, you'll let us disarm you" and adds "there's no quicker way for this to turn bad than to not notify about a weapon or to have a gun and not be cooperative".

The first officer comes up to my vehicle and he is sweating hard, obviously nervous. He knocks on the car window. My wife and infant son are inside. My wife lowers the window. "Ms. Tiger, maam, I am going to disarm you". My wife replies "I think you'll need a warrant for that". The officer replies "No, not when it involves our safety. I need to be in control of all weapons". My wife replies "Do you want to see my permit?". The officer insists on taking the weapon, looking twitchy. My wife hands him her purse slowly and he takes the weapon. He asks her to stay in the car. The officer returns to his vehicle and unloads her weapon and puts the bullets in the holster. I sit tight and the officers are fondling the unloaded guns. I ask "do you like that, its interesting". The officer replies "I have no preference sir, I prefer semi-autos". His partner asks what caliber the weapons are and I reply. The first officer asks again if I am armed, I reply "no". The officer advises me to "slowly, remove your wallet and hand me your identification". No request for registration or insurance. I give him my ccw permit and license. The officer makes a phone call and reports the serial numbers of my guns or the number of my permit and/or drivers license (or something along those lines while holding the firearm and my identification).

While we are waiting the partner seems interested in more small talk and asks about the guns and how we like the holsters. I talk a little bit with him about it and try to lighten the mood. The first officer gets off the phone and says "I'm going to put these in your passenger side seat. Don't load them until we are out of sight". I say "where do we go from here?". The officer says "this is a $244 dollar citation and 4 points on your license. But because you were cooperative I'm not going to issue one tonight. Slow it down". The officers advise me to return to the vehicle. The officers get the last word in and tell me again "although there may not be a law that you have to tell us, we would have had you on the ground and weapons out if we found you had a gun and had lied to us".

I return to the vehicle. My wife is highly annoyed. We sit and chat for a minute and wait for the officers to leave, reload the weapons and continue on our way.

Discussion

Ok, now that I have described the event, here are a few thoughts:

1)Was this felony protocol? Their weapons were not drawn, but I find it highly irregular to be asked to exit the vehicle and to place my hands on their hood for speeding. I'm not a felon and do not even have a traffic record.

2) Although in Florida there is no duty to disclose, I did so without the expectation of being disarmed. If I could do it again, having thought about it, I would likely still disclose, however I would not have disclosed any information about the passengers of my vehicle, namely my wife. I felt really uncomfortable being disarmed. I felt I made a mistake by disclosing information about passengers and firearms.

3)I find it highly irregular that they would then go on to disarm the passenger on a routine speeding stop. My wife felt threatened by the twitchy officer and when he pursued the issue on the basis of officer safety, after she protested and stated he would need a warrant, she decided to cooperate.

4)Although in Florida had I resisted disarmament or had my wife resisted disarmament, legally I feel we would have been justified. However, the officers threatened to pull their weapons on me and did not seem to know much about the law. Furthermore, legal battles happen after the fact... with an infant in the car we had no interest in anything other than getting back on the road, rather than taking a stand for the 4th amendment with two twitchy officers.

5)The officers threatened to pull their weapons on me 3 times, what gives? They seemed really nervous.

6)Although I'm glad I didn't get a ticket, I do feel like I have been violated. I do not appreciate being disarmed for no reason on a traffic stop, and again felt they were out of line disarming a passenger with a baby.

I would appreciate your perspectives on the situation, my behavior, the officers behavior, and any insight into the legality of firearms during traffic stops in Florida.

Best,

Triple+T
 
Last edited:
You did fine. You can always ask if you are free to leave. At that point, the LEO either has to detain you or let you leave. If they say you aren't free to leave, you can ask for an attorney and the LEO is then barred from further questioning. If you had pursued this course of action, you can imagine the reaction you might have gotten.

Based on the LEO's behavior, it's pretty safe to assume that you were profiled as some sort of law breaker (drugs, theft, who knows). As far as the law in Florida goes, you can lawfully resist an illegal command by law enforcement with nonviolent means but not violent means.

Edit: Almost forgot. You should definitely report those two to the relevant contact at their agency. Their behavior was inappropriate (based on the information provided), as you might have guessed.
 

Wierd. Although the cops may be wrong, they are absolutely in charge in such situations. IMHO it is better to comply even when they are wrong (except for requests to search my vehicle, I NEVER grant permission for that.) and go on your way. I believe that numerous positive experiences with CWP holders may well mellow the officers approach to honest citizens.
I've been in at least 8 "LEO-Interfacing Situations" My weapon was unloaded and locked open on the dash twice (before I changed my technique) and every other time I've handed my License over with my CWP showing right next to it, and once when I called the cops I told them I was a CWP holder. In every instance but one the officer pretended he didn't see anything or ignored my statement. The one other time he conversationally asked me what I was carrying, how I liked it, etc (just talked about guns for several minutes) and let me off with a warning.
I guess North Dakota cops are real professionals.

 
1st mistake the lazy cop made is not getting out of his vehicle to approach you.second,was letting you approach him while he was seated in the vehicle.third mistake,once he found out that you had a gun,was calling for backup,having backup remove your weapon,while his lazy butt no doubt,sat in the car.poor training,lack of respect for you and your family.he should never have endangered your life by asking you to leave the confines of the vehicle,which exposed you to being struck by oncoming traffic.your cop must have been a supervisor.(from my experiences as a cop)
if you had been a wanted person,you could have shot him easily in his vehicle,and he would have had no way to defend himself.he was a sitting duck.instead of him having total control of what happened,you could have easily overpowered the situation as he was basically a sitting duck.thank god for all involved,you are a law abiding citizen.
 
Last edited:
Another thing, whether they are right or wrong, you may not have a duty to inform them, however if they ASK if you're armed, you DO have to answer honestly under law. And given how it started, it sounds like you would have undergone a pat-down if you had said no anyways.

Either way, I agree with gatorJames, their actions seem quite odd and I doubt the way the stop was handled is in accordance with department policy, it cant hurt to file a complaint against them.
 
Dprice3844444, just to clarify the first officer had exited his vehicle before I had exited mine, and remained standing throughout the stop. The first officer disarmed me while the partner watched. These are largely academic differences but I'd like to report it accurately. Keep the comments coming and thank you for participating in this discussion.
 

IN MY OPINION; The biggest single factor when talking to LEO's is to stay calm, even if they aren't. Answer calmly and directly, don't volunteer extranious information. Speak in a clear tone of voice (you want the dash-cam to pick up what you say clearly-it might save your butt later if the cop is an idiot.) DON'T get cranky! It won't endear you to the cops, and if you appear to be the sort that is unable to govern your temper, well, you think a nervous, P.O'd cop in your face is a GOOD thing?
 
Another thing, whether they are right or wrong, you may not have a duty to inform them, however if they ASK if you're armed, you DO have to answer honestly under law. And given how it started, it sounds like you would have undergone a pat-down if you had said no anyways.

Either way, I agree with gatorJames, their actions seem quite odd and I doubt the way the stop was handled is in accordance with department policy, it cant hurt to file a complaint against them.
Which law would that be?
 

People who loudly and forcefully proclaim their rights to a cop who may not be mad yet remind me of a epitath that I read as a kid:

"Here lies the body of Mike O'Day
Who died maintaining his right-of-way
His right was clear and his will was strong
But he's just a dead as if he'd been wrong"

There may be a time to get loud at a cop, but I haven't seen it yet.
 
You did fine. You can always ask if you are free to leave. At that point, the LEO either has to detain you or let you leave. If they say you aren't free to leave, you can ask for an attorney and the LEO is then barred from further questioning. If you had pursued this course of action, you can imagine the reaction you might have gotten.

Based on the LEO's behavior, it's pretty safe to assume that you were profiled as some sort of law breaker (drugs, theft, who knows). As far as the law in Florida goes, you can lawfully resist an illegal command by law enforcement with nonviolent means but not violent means.

Edit: Almost forgot. You should definitely report those two to the relevant contact at their agency. Their behavior was inappropriate (based on the information provided), as you might have guessed.
Umm, he was being detained, it was a traffic stop.
 
1)Was this felony protocol? Their weapons were not drawn, but I find it highly irregular to be asked to exit the vehicle and to place my hands on their hood for speeding. I'm not a felon and do not even have a traffic record
.
No, on a felony stop, they already have their weapons drawn.

2) Although in Florida there is no duty to disclose, I did so without the expectation of being disarmed. If I could do it again, having thought about it, I would likely still disclose, however I would not have disclosed any information about the passengers of my vehicle, namely my wife. I felt really uncomfortable being disarmed. I felt I made a mistake by disclosing information about passengers and firearms.
Probably disclosing for yourself was a good idea, presumably he saw a bulge in your pocket. As for you wife's carry, I would not have disclosed.

3)I find it highly irregular that they would then go on to disarm the passenger on a routine speeding stop. My wife felt threatened by the twitchy officer and when he pursued the issue on the basis of officer safety, after she protested and stated he would need a warrant, she decided to cooperate.
Some cops are like that. Oh, and tell your wife to drop the warrant spiel, they don't need one in this situation.

4)Although in Florida had I resisted disarmament or had my wife resisted disarmament, legally I feel we would have been justified. However, the officers threatened to pull their weapons on me and did not seem to know much about the law. Furthermore, legal battles happen after the fact... with an infant in the car we had no interest in anything other than getting back on the road, rather than taking a stand for the 4th amendment with two twitchy officers.
Nope, you would have both gone to jail and Children and Family would be babysitting your child until it was sorted out. Possibly needing a court order to get your kid back.

5)The officers threatened to pull their weapons on me 3 times, what gives? They seemed really nervous.
Some cops are like that. They like to intimidate people. Or they honestly believe that they were giving you reasonable advise?


What county was this in?
 
"You're gonna draw your gun and ........ what? Give me a ticket for going 60 in a 45? Knock yaself out, Sparky."

Them guns ain't magic, Officer Friendly, it ain't like you're gonna hex somebody with one.
 
Odd. I haven't been stopped more than twice in FL. I live here. But, while the officers (FHP) have been effective in proving that they're in charge, they've not been provocative. At least not once they realize I'm willing to comply. I got pulled at 85 in a 55. He was less than pleased. never asked if I was armed. At the time, I wasn't sure, so I gave him my CCW. He asked where it was, and once told, told me to keep my hands away from that pocket. I said, "cool - done." He wrote me for 14 over. I said, "Thank you sir."
 
Alachua County Sheriffs.

I live in Alachua County. The last time I was stopped by an ASO deputy, I was treated very professionally and wasn't given a ticket even after I told him I was a defense attorney.:eek: (I figured honesty was best too.)
 
What if he had left his pistol and keys in the car with his wife and locked the door behind him? Could the police break in to search for further evidence of speeding in the locked car?
 
I am sorry to hear about your experience. I was pulled over about 3 months ago by the Florida Highway Patrol and thought it went well. The officer pulled up behind me and walked to my car through the passenger-side blind spot. He had his hand on his pistol and was very alert, but he was polite. I was later told that the FHP’s computer system links license plates with concealed weapons licenses and they know if the person they have pulled over is licensed to carry. I told him I was carrying and gave him my license and CWP. He asked where the gun was, and I told him it was on my right hip. He glanced down to make sure it was not easily accessible and simply asked that I keep my hands on the steering wheel when he came back. He took my license, wrote out a written warning came back and let me go.

FWIW, the FHP training bulletin for dealing with concealed weapons is here:

http://www.flhsmv.gov/Bulletins/ConcealedLegalTraining.pdf
 
I was later told that the FHP’s computer system links license plates with concealed weapons licenses and they know if the person they have pulled over is licensed to carry.

Just to clarify: ONLY if the person they've stopped is both a) the owner of that car, and b) that car is from FL.

I don't know if the OP is a FL resident or not. He said "traveling in FL" which made me thing not. If not, the officers would have no idea whether he was a permit holder, or likely to be armed.
 
What if he had left his pistol and keys in the car with his wife and locked the door behind him? Could the police break in to search for further evidence of speeding in the locked car?

No, they certainly may not.
 
When the officer asked "Are you armed?" why didn't you say "Yes sir but I have a permit."? You DO have a permit don't you?
 
What if he had left his pistol and keys in the car with his wife and locked the door behind him? Could the police break in to search for further evidence of speeding in the locked car?
No, but they could forcefully enter the vehicle and extract the passenger for refusal to exit, then arrest them for "Resisting officer without violence to his or her person.", and/or "refuse to comply with any lawful order or direction of any law enforcement officer"
 
Just to clarify: ONLY if the person they've stopped is both a) the owner of that car, and b) that car is from FL.

I don't know if the OP is a FL resident or not. He said "traveling in FL" which made me thing not. If not, the officers would have no idea whether he was a permit holder, or likely to be armed.
Incorrect. FCIC is only accessible from terminals at dispatch, not from patrol vehicles.

ETA: There are a limited number of mobile devices/personnel that have direct access to FCIC.
 
Last edited:
I have seen this a lot from friends in Florida who are LEOs.
I have mostly seen it in Dade County, because there is a ton of crime there. A lot of them say they disarm as a general rule, no matter what the situation. Which, in Florida, seems to be easy to categorize as "for the safety of the officer."

I must say, though, that most are just the usual: Step out of the car, LEO takes the gun, checks the stolen gun database, unloads it, and proceeds with the stop. No back up or car searches.

It's a dominance and control thing more than it's a safety thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top