Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Texas concealed stats - older but still relevant.

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Brad Johnson, Feb 9, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brad Johnson

    Brad Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,076
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    I searched for this before posting, so my apologies if its a repost.

    I pulled some numbers from the Texas CHL page (The Texas Dept of Public Safety). The numbers are for 2001 convictions of licensees vs non-licenees. Again, these are convictions, not arrests.

    All ratios are by statistical relevance, not total convictions

    Category - NonCHL:CHL

    Murder - 157:1

    Kidnapping - 124:0

    Sexual Assault - 151:1

    Robbery - 1360:0

    Aggravated Assault - 132:1

    Assault - 320:1

    Terroristic Threat - 245:1

    Burglary - 5675:1 (not a typo)

    Indecency with a child - 108:1

    Unlawfully carrying a weapon - 132:1

    Deadly Conduct Discharge of Firearm - 102:1

    Harrassment - 48:1

    Total all categories (some not included above) - 194:1

    If you want the raw data you can find them on the Tx Dept of Public Safety CHL conviction stats page.

    Brad
     
  2. Brigrat

    Brigrat Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    West Texas
    These stats would have more meaning if they told you the total ration of Non-CHL:CHL's in Texas. 194:1 average sounds good, but if the the Ration of Non-CHL:CHL is 400:1, then these numbers don't have much value.
     
  3. Stand_Watie

    Stand_Watie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,506
    Location:
    east Texas
    The current number of CHL holders is 237,000 according to the website, so to figure the ratio (if it was the same in 2001 as it is today) you'd need to divide that into about 20 million.

    Kind of risky going on one years data though I'd say. I imagine there are a lot of years when there are zero convictions for murder by a CHL holder.
     
  4. Brad Johnson

    Brad Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,076
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    I disagree - I think they are absolutely invaluable! The fact that this shows non-CHL holders being convicted of murder at a rate one hundred and fifty seven times greater than CHL holders is slap-in-the-face astonishing. It's a number guaranteed to make an anti bristle, and it's from an official source that can be easily accessed.

    Although having the ratio of non-CHL vs CHL in the general populace would be a nice bonus, it would not change the relevance of these figures.

    Brad
     
  5. brookstexas

    brookstexas member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2003
    Messages:
    241
    Location:
    Central Texas
  6. morganm01

    morganm01 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    317
    20,000,000:237,000

    comes out to

    84.39:1

    84.39 non-chl holders for every one chl holder. Based on that the numbers are good and bad.

    Category - NonCHL:CHL

    Murder - 1.87:1

    Kidnapping - 124:0

    Sexual Assault - 1.79:1

    Robbery - 1360:0

    Aggravated Assault - 1.56:1

    Assault - 3.79:1

    Terroristic Threat - 2.9:1

    Burglary - 67.25:1 (not a typo)

    Indecency with a child - 1.28:1

    Unlawfully carrying a weapon - 1.56:1

    Deadly Conduct Discharge of Firearm - 1.21:1

    Harrassment - 0.57:1

    Total all categories (some not included above) - 2.30:1


    CHL holders apparently have a higher incidence of Harrassment than the non's. Overall really good though.
     
  7. Brad Johnson

    Brad Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,076
    Location:
    Lubbock, TX
    I think everyone is falling prey to the mass-media statistics game. Why introduce the per capita data when most Texans are law abiding? The real question is this - Of the criminal element (using actual convictions as the criteria) how many are CHL holders.

    The additional data artificially dilutes the numbers. We should be concerned with showing that We Are Not The Criminals! By showing actual convictions we are proving beyond ANY doubt that licensee are most definitely NOT the problem.

    The per capita ratios are great for trending studies, but the conviction data is absolute, irrefutable proof that CHL holders are not the bloodthirsty maniacs we're made out to be.

    Brad
     
  8. westex

    westex Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    East of El Paso-West of Ft. Worth
    Brad
    I want everone to continue to think I'm a "bloodthristy maniac" (I'm really a sheep in wolfs clothing). It's saved me a lot of hassle over the years.:D
     
  9. TheOtherOne

    TheOtherOne Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    1,422
    Location:
    Ogden
    So, in Texas, CCW holders are more likely to harass and be indecent with a child than non-CCW holders. I like playing devil's advocate sometimes. :(
     
  10. Brigrat

    Brigrat Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    West Texas
    All I am trying to do is push my accuracy in statistics policy. the origional data set was incomplete, as it assumed equal portions of CHL:Non-CHL. the second data set is far more statistically accurate, and still proves the point that CHL holders are less dangerous, not more dangerous as the Liberals would have you believe.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page