Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Texas lawmaker wants to outlaw gun ban if it

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by nathan, Jan 12, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Byrd666

    Byrd666 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    666
    Location:
    Hill County, Texas
    Since Texas is still technically a Republic, I thought I might share this from THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION

    Sec. 23. RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.

    Thank you Rep. Steve Toth and Lt. Gov. Dewhurst and without a doubt Gov. Rick Perry for keeping our 2nd Amendment Rights alive
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2013
  2. nathan

    nathan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,067
    I hope Texas legislature makes those moves as quickly once Biden brings his recommendation to Obama by Tuesday. This week will be crucial as to what moves the NRA and many gun owners should do next.
     
  3. flyskater

    flyskater Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    241
    Texas has always been a thorn on the federal government even before they were they're own nation (1836)
    When ATF agents raided the Waco (Daividians) on information that the religious sect was stockpiling weapons only to have the ATF retreat with their tails between their legs. Listening to the evidence, it shows how corrupt the federal government was. Based on the court hearing, the ATF activity log was missing, 3 camera tapes that shows evidence was destroyed ATF,
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2013
  4. AZ

    AZ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    125
    Location:
    The Great State of Arizona
    Except in this case the ATF would have a considerably greater mandate to crack down. The laws in Colorado and Washington have gone unaddressed largely because public sentiment is on their side. Much fewer people are ardently opposed to an AWB than to the War on Drugs, and even then we have seen an increased rate of raids on medicinal marijuana growers over the last four years. It is highly unlikely that any law that passes will fail to be enforced considering the magnitude of the argument. Gun control has become an increasingly centralized debate and the Feds aren't likely to treat insubordination with ambiguity.
     
  5. Bhi curamach

    Bhi curamach Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    89
    Texas can actually split into 6 parts if it wishes to no longer remain a part of the US? I swear I remember reading something about them requiring something like this in order for them to accept general USA statehood.
    I'm sure Ive heard Texans mention something similar in the past. I don't often pay proper attention so I cant be positive, but I'm somewhat certain they retain the right to bail and splinter into their original grouping? Yes no?
     
  6. Queen_of_Thunder

    Queen_of_Thunder member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,881
    Location:
    Where God purifies the soul. The West Texas desert
    I would argue that its a States Rights Issue with the Bill of Rights the protection to guard against States overstepping their boundarys.
     
  7. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    All the states are Republics. From the federal Constitution.

    "Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"
     
  8. Dean1818

    Dean1818 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    Texas!
    God bless Texas !

    Its a great place to live
     
  9. breakingcontact

    breakingcontact Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,237
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Dean...don't tell everyone that!

    The rattlesnakes, armadillos and hipsters in Austin are out of control.

    Don't move to Texas!
     
  10. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,808
    Location:
    Texas
    Don't think never my less than courteous friend. It could happen and for my right I would fight! You must not be from Texas or you would understand.

    Oh and by the way there was a good reason for that civil war too.
     
  11. RyeDaddy

    RyeDaddy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    216
    Location:
    Hellbound in Fort Worth, TX
    Seconded.
     
  12. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    How about the Father of Texas?

    Sam Houston, President of the Republic of Texas;

    "I will endeavor to say a few words in behalf of the Union, and the necessity of union to preserve it, which I trust will not fall unheeded. The condition of the country is such, the dangers which beset it are so numerous, the foes of the Union so implacable and energetic, that no risk should be heeded by him who has a voice to raise in its behalf; and so long as I have strength to stand, I will peril even health in its cause.

    I had felt an interest in this occasion, on many accounts. It is said a crisis is impending. The clamor of disunion is heard in the land. The safety of the Government is threatened; and it seemed to me that the time had come for a renewal of our vows of fidelity to the Constitution and to interchange, one with the other, sentiments of devotion to the whole country. I begin to feel that the issue really is upon us, which involves the perpetuity of the Government which we have received from our fathers. Were we to fail to pay our tributes to its worth, and to enlist in its defense, we would be unworthy longer to enjoy it.

    It has been my misfortune to peril my all for the Union. So indissolubly connected is my life, my history, my hopes, my fortunes, with it, that when it falls, I would ask that with it might close my career, that I might not survive the destruction of the shrine that I had been taught to regard as holy and inviolate, since my boyhood. I have beheld it, the fairest fabric of Government God ever vouchsafed to man, more than a half century. May it never be my fate to stand sadly gazing on its ruins! To be deprived of it, after enjoying it so long, would be a calamity, such as no people yet have endured.

    Upwards of forty-seven years ago, I enlisted, a mere boy, to sustain the National flag and in defense of a harassed frontier, now the abode of a dense civilization. Then disunion was never heard of, save a few discordant notes from the Hartford Convention. It was anathematized by every patriot in the land, and the concocters of the scheme were branded as traitors. The peril I then underwent, in common with my fellow-soldiers, in behalf of the Union, would have been in vain, unless the patriotism of the nation had arisen against these disturbers of the public peace. With what heart could these gallant men again volunteer in defense of the Union, unless the Union could withstand the shock of treason and overturn the traitors? It did this; and when again, in 1836, I volunteered to aid in transplanting American liberty to this soil, it was with the belief that the Constitution and the Union were to be perpetual bless*ings to the human race,—that the success of the experiment of our fathers was beyond dispute, and that whether under the banner of the Lone Star or that many-starred banner of the Union, I could point to the land of Washington, Jefferson, and Jackson, as the land blest beyond all other lands, where freedom would be eternal and Union un*broken. It concerns me deeply, as it does every one here, that these bright anticipations should be realized; and that it should be continued not only the proudest nationality the world has ever produced, but the freest and the most perfect. I have seen it extend from the wilds of Tennessee, then a wilderness, across the Missis*sippi, achieve the annexation of Texas, scaling the Rocky Mountains in its onward march, sweeping the valleys of California, and laving its pioneer foot*steps in the waves of the Pacific. I have seen this mighty progress, and it still re*mains free and independent. Power, wealth, expansion, victory, have followed in its path, and yet the aegis of the Union has been broad enough to en*compass all. Is not this worth perpetuating? Will you exchange this for all the hazards, the anarchy and carnage of civil war? Do you believe that it will be dissevered and no shock felt in society? You are asked to plunge into a revolution; but are you told how to get out of it? Not so; but it is to be a leap in the dark—a leap into an abyss, whose horrors would even fright the mad spirits of disunion who tempt you on.

    Our forefathers saw the danger to which freedom would be subjected, from the helpless condition of disunited States; and, to “form a more perfect Union,” they established this Government. They saw the effect of foreign influence on rival States, the effect of dissensions at home, and to strengthen all and perpetuate all, to bind all together, yet leave all free, they gave us the Constitution and the Union. Where are the evidences that their patriotic labor was in vain? Have we not emerged from an infant’s to a giant’s strength? Have not empires been added to our domain, and States been created? All the blessings which they promised their posterity have been vouchsafed; and millions now enjoy them, who without this Union would to-day be oppressed and down-trodden in far-off foreign lands!

    What is there that is free that we have not? Are our rights invaded and no Government ready to protect them? No! Are our institutions wrested from us and others foreign to our taste forced upon us? No! Is the right of free speech, a free press, or free suffrage taken from us? No! Has our property been taken from us and the Government failed to interpose when called upon? No, none of these! The rights of the States and the rights of individuals are still maintained. We have yet the Constitution, we have yet a judiciary, which has never been appealed to in vain—we have yet just laws and officers to administer them; and an army and navy, ready to maintain any and every constitutional right of the citizen. Whence then this clamor about disunion? Whence this cry of protection to property or disunion, when even the very loudest in the cry, declared under their Senatorial oaths, but a few months since, that no protection was necessary? Are we to sell reality for a phantom?

    There is no longer a holy ground upon which the footsteps of the demagogue may not fall. One by one the sacred things placed by patriotic hands upon the altar of our liberties, have been torn down. The Declaration of our Independence is jeered at. The farewell counsels of Washington are derided. The charm of those historic names which make glorious our past has been broken, and now the Union is no longer held sacred, but made secondary to the success of party and the adoption of abstractions. We hear of secession—“peaceable secession.” We are to believe that this people, whose progressive civilization has known no obstacles, but has already driven back one race and is fast Americanizing another, who have conquered armies and navies,—whose career has been onward and never has receded, be the step right or wrong, is at last quietly and calmly to be denationalized, to be rent into fragments, sanctioned by the Constitution, and there not only be none of the incidents of revolution, but amid peace and happiness we are to have freedom from abolition clamor, security to the institution of slavery, and a career of glory under a Southern Confederacy, which we can never attain in our present condition! When we deny the right of a State to secede, we are pointed to the resolves of chivalric South Carolina and other States; and are told, “Let them go out and you can not whip them back.” My friends, there will be no necessity of whipping them back. They will soon whip themselves, and will not be worth whipping back. Deprived of the protection of the Union, of the aegis of the Constitution, they would soon dwindle into petty States, to be again rent in twain by dissensions or through the ambition of selfish chieftains, and would become a prey to foreign powers."

    "Talk of frightening the North into measures by threats of dissolving the Union! It is child’s play and folly. It is all the Black Republican leaders want. American blood, North nor South, has not yet become so ignoble as to be chilled by threats. Strife begets strife, threat begets threat, and taunt begets taunt, and these disunionists know it. American blood brooks no such restraints as these men would put upon it. I would blush with shame for America, if I could believe that one vast portion of my countrymen had sunk so low that childish threats would intimidate them."

    “But if, through division in the ranks of those opposed to Mr. Lincoln, he should be elected, we have no excuse for dissolving the Union.”


    “The Union is worth more than Mr. Lincoln, and if the battle is to be fought for the Constitution, let us fight it in the Union and for the sake of the Union.”


    “Let past differences be forgotten in the determination to unite against sectionalism.”


    “Whenever an encroachment is made upon our constitutional rights, I am ready to peril my life to re*sist it; but let us first use constitutional means.”


    “Let the people say to these abolition agitators of the North, and to the disunion agitators of the South, ‘You can not dissolve this Union. We will put you both down; but we will not let the Union go!’
     
  13. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,808
    Location:
    Texas
    He said it right here in your own post.



    And if that doesn't work? Then civil uprising is the only means left. Again, don't think it can't happen! There are millions of patriots in this country willing to stand and defend our constitution against foreign and DOMESTIC threats.
     
  14. joeschmoe

    joeschmoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,291
    but let us first use constitutional means

    Just at the suggestion of legislation, that has no hope of passage or surviving SCOTUS challenge, you're already threatening seccesion?
    You need to read Houstons speech again.

    "Talk of frightening the North into measures by threats of dissolving the Union! It is child’s play and folly. It is all the Black Republican leaders want. American blood, North nor South, has not yet become so ignoble as to be chilled by threats. Strife begets strife, threat begets threat, and taunt begets taunt, and these disunionists know it. American blood brooks no such restraints as these men would put upon it. I would blush with shame for America, if I could believe that one vast portion of my countrymen had sunk so low that childish threats would intimidate them."
     
  15. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,808
    Location:
    Texas
    No you need to re-read my post. I never threatened it. I believe I said quite clearly "Don't think it can't happen".
     
  16. RetiredUSNChief

    RetiredUSNChief Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Messages:
    7,250
    Location:
    SC (Home), VA (Work)
    Oh, dear...you and one of my brothers...

    As another member so kindly pointed out, ALL states have a republican form of government, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

    However, since the (seemingly) obvious inference is that you mean "Republic of Texas", might I quote from the preamble from the Texas Constitution:

    "Humbly invoking the blessings of Almighty God, the people of the State of Texas, do ordain and establish this Constitution."

    :neener:

    Man, I can hardly wait until the next time I meet up with my brother and he starts in on Texas again! Last time it was the old "Texas is the only state in the union which can fly the state flag on the same level as the United State flag" argument. Oh, the glee I had with THAT one!

    :evil::evil:


    Seriously, on the OP topic...while there is little doubt that any real conflict between Texas and the federal government (such as arrests of federal agents) will actually hold any legal water, the political statement that this makes is very important.
     
  17. slamfirev10

    slamfirev10 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    fine thread and posts (for the most part)

    again, don't mess with texas
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page