The first batch of Rarlins ship today!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The threaded muzzle may not be our cup of tea, but if it is well done and unobtrusive, may make the gun more desirable for someone else some day. It costs maybe $4 at the factory, but more like $50 plus at LGS, more if the mag must be bobbed.
 
If Ruger does these right, people 'might' just realize that the JM guns weren't really all 'that' good in the first place. :eek:

Yessir. I’d guess that some second hand JM buyers might have found a good gun because the first buyer got it fixed under warranty or did some tuning.

I know whoever gets my Remlin someday will think it was made right the first time. But I know better.

Even my JM 39AS needing some tuning by me. That thing was a light striking, heavy trigger machine from the factory.

While I’m rolling, ask me if I’ll miss microgroove rifling.
 
Last edited:
with no malice intended, i have no problem spending good money on a non plastic gun. in this day and age we spend 800 on a cell phone or more on a tablet for a kid and it is junk the following year. so all wood steel no plastic trigger guard etc. winner winner chicken dinner. just saying.

Yep.

The JM proof tested Marlins were great guns, but there isn’t a company around today that will support it under any type of warranty work, so it is what it is. Of course, good gunsmiths can make repairs.

In addition to the improvements to the new Marlins, you will be getting Ruger customer service, which by most accounts is a leg up from the past situation under Remington.

I also get the love of the “blued and wood” guns. I suspect they will come in time. This is just the first iteration.

This is NOT a cheap gun by any means. But I suspect had Ruger launched the first Marlin lever as a “Marlin American” with plastic furniture and a ceracoat barrel and receiver for $499, they would have gotten a lot of grief for that.
 
The accuracy doesn’t surprise me...

I have a Remlin M1895 in .45/70 that shoots one-hole at 50yds.
It is blue steel and wood, but got no love!

It’s the bottom one, of the two. It had slightly better fitting wood, better grain...
I bought them on clearance. After $50/each Marlin rebate, they cost me $243.00 each.

I sold the top one through FFL holder friend for 475.00. Now it would go for over $1,000 on GB.
I had just installed a Leupold VariX III on the one I kept. Two taped holes were fouling shot and reference shot before adjusting scope.
Load is a Lee 400gr RFN @ 0.460” of WW alloy, over 20.0gr of #2400 with a 1.0gr tuft of Dacron pillow fill.
Chrono’s about 1,300fps for factory duplication. Just a nice thump for recoil.
My hunting load is a RCBS 300gr FNGC over 29.5gr of #2400 for 1,750fps. (322gr as cast). I’ve never recovered one from game...

I also have a circa 2001 M1895G, Guide gun , no ports... It’s just as accurate and is the one that gets hunted most...

My first remlin 1895 was also deadly accurate and I also got mine for something under $300 after mail in rebate. I havn't shot my current remlin enough the have an opinion on accuracy. Its been a safe queen so for but I finally got some new sights to get it squared away.
 
Yessir. I’d guess that some second hand JM buyers might have found a good gun because the first buyer got it fixed under warranty or did some tuning.

I know whoever gets my Remlin someday will think it was made right the first time. But I know better.

Even my JM 39AS needing some tuning by me. That thing was a light striking, heavy trigger machine from the factory.

While I’m rolling, ask me if I’ll miss microgroove rifling.

My first Marlin went back because of a canted front sight and it could not be zero'd. When it came back they had just tightened the barrel another few degrees so the front sight was now straight but the rear sight was now canted as well as the mag tube. Good ole Remington. :uhoh: I will say my CBA is so far as I can see flawless and well fitted.

This is NOT a cheap gun by any means. But I suspect had Ruger launched the first Marlin lever as a “Marlin American” with plastic furniture and a ceracoat barrel and receiver for $499, they would have gotten a lot of grief for that.

I have been a blued steel and walnut guy for a long time but I have grown tired of taking care of all of them and wincing over wood dings. I would actually really love a cerakote and plastic stocked $499 marlin to go with my pretty one. Your right though, that would not have been a good public relations move.
 
I thought one interesting mention was when Ruger Guy said he opened a NIB JM Marlin from the stuff they acquired that was not as smooth as their new Marlins

Not surprising to me.

It seems that when those comparisons are made that the new models aren't as smooth as the previous generation renditions, people dont take into account that those old ones have countless rounds through them that smoothed them out.
 
Last edited:
how do they price out compared to the comperable Winchesters made in Japan? The sticker price on new Winchester's has kept me from seriously considering. Figured I'd wait to see what Ruger does, or maybe grab a Henry - people who get them seem to like them.
 
how do they price out compared to the comparable Winchesters made in Japan? The sticker price on new Winchester's has kept me from seriously considering. Figured I'd wait to see what Ruger does, or maybe grab a Henry - people who get them seem to like them.

Currently offered in .45-70? Of course, these are all traditionally styled.

$1,409.99
https://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-1886/current/model-1886-short-rifle.html

$1,549.99
https://www.winchesterguns.com/prod...6/current/model-1886-saddle-ring-carbine.html

$1,839.99
https://www.winchesterguns.com/prod...nt/model-1886-deluxe-rifle-case-hardened.html
 


I have been a blued steel and walnut guy for a long time but I have grown tired of taking care of all of them and wincing over wood dings. I would actually really love a cerakote and plastic stocked $499 marlin to go with my pretty one. Your right though, that would not have been a good public relations move.

How about a Mossberg? I hear they actually run fine…but kinda fugly….

LINK REMOVED BY SPATS MCGEE BECAUSE IT MADE MY VIRUS SCAN GO CRAZY.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think they look great and the price is reasonable, 45-70 levers aren't cheap. The Henry is a no go with its butter soft insides. Adjusted for inflation id Bet these are around the same price a new Marlin would have been In the 50s or 60s.

Even the picture of the guns on the rack look better then what Remington put out, you could see problems from 10 feet away.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping for a .30-30. I have to admit that stainless with a weatherproof stock might be tempting especially with cut rifling if they can sell them for a fair price.

No cut rifling. Ruger is hammer forging the barrels just like all their other rifles.
 
Not my cup of tea. Hopefully, those to come will be, but I'd be happy if Ruger just made properly hardened rear band screws for the million(s) of 336's already out there.:) Somebody needs to step up with quality parts for all these older guns. But since Ruger doesn't support its own tang-safety M77's, I won't hold my breath.
 


New Winchesters are mighty hard to find in the wild. Every now and then a dealer gets one and a 15-20% premium gets tacked on to the price.
 
Looks like the offering and price is right in line with best Industry practices. They have invested a good deal of money bringing these to market, and there is excess demand for these currently. So it makes good financial sense to first introduce the highest margin model that has the widest appeal. So, 45-70 stainless with a poly stock....sounds about right. As market demand is satiated, the price comes down, margin comes down, and more affordable offerings will come out. And then there is the scale of the operation, as more units are produced, the investment is amortized over a wider range of products there becomes a higher incentive to go after market share, and a wider range is produced to capture a wider range of interests. Long way of saying, if these aren't your cuppa tea, hang tight....they'll build more
 
I'm wanting a .30-30 but the street price is going to have to be sub-$1k----well below $1k actually----otherwise I'll just pick up another Browning X-bolt
 
How about a Mossberg? I hear they actually run fine…but kinda fugly….

LINK REMOVED BY SPATS MCGEE BECAUSE IT MADE MY VIRUS SCAN GO CRAZY.

That is horrendous. I wouldn’t mind one of the more conventional ones but they would have to chamber it in something other than 30/30 to get me interested. They seam to be discontinued now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see a micro and it's not a 22 RF, I just load jacketed bullets.

And you don’t know what you’re missing!
Three shots at 50yds! .460” Lee 400gr RFN over 20gr #2400.
 

Attachments

  • 16D273E0-2ECF-40B7-BB78-C0AECB9E3B7A.jpeg
    16D273E0-2ECF-40B7-BB78-C0AECB9E3B7A.jpeg
    77.4 KB · Views: 17
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top