Fleetwood_Captain
Member
One thing I've noticed about a lot of older hand-ejector revolvers is the lack of a shrouded ejector rod.
Considering that people back then tended to be more utilitarian when it came to purchasing a firearm, the lack of a shroud to protect the ejector seems a little counter-productive.
Are there any advantages to having an unshrouded ejector on a revolver?
Considering that people back then tended to be more utilitarian when it came to purchasing a firearm, the lack of a shroud to protect the ejector seems a little counter-productive.
Are there any advantages to having an unshrouded ejector on a revolver?