Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

This doesn't sound right!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by LAR-15, Apr 30, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    `(C)(i) the manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by, the United States or a State or a department or agency of the United States, or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, of a junk gun; or

    `(ii) the transfer to, or possession by, a law enforcement officer employed by an entity referred to in clause (i) of a junk gun for law enforcement purposes (whether on or off-duty);

    `(D) the transfer to, or possession by, a rail police officer employed by a rail carrier and certified or commissioned as a police officer under the laws of a State of a junk gun for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off-duty); or


    :uhoh:
     
  2. oneslowgun

    oneslowgun Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    242
    Location:
    marysville, OH
    Ahhh.... Huh? :confused:
     
  3. Elmer Snerd

    Elmer Snerd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    TN
    More background, please.
     
  4. Sinsaba

    Sinsaba Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    Northern VA
    It of course looks like one of those anti-"Saturday Night Special" laws. But usually the police are exempt. Unless of course it is some UN anti gun thing.
     
  5. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,953
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    LAR-15, what is this about?
     
  6. cloudedice

    cloudedice Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    CT
    It's from a bill introduced into the Senate in 1997, and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It never made it out of committee. Also the section quoted was prefaced by "(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--"

    Here's the text of the actual bill.
    American Handgun Standards Act of 1997
     
  7. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    Just the whole term 'junk gun' and allowing police to have them seemed weird
     
  8. cloudedice

    cloudedice Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    CT
    IANAL, but my guess is that the provision was put in place to allow police to confiscate 'junk guns' without violating the law. This would be included in the "law enforcement purposes."
     
  9. CSA 357

    CSA 357 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,400
    Location:
    North Alabama
    :confused: say that again:confused:
     
  10. cloudedice

    cloudedice Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    CT
    My original guess was that the quoted text of the bill was included to allow police and government agencies to confiscate guns they classify as 'junk guns.'

    My thinking was 'how can an LEO confiscate, and therefore be in possession of, a gun which is illegal for a person to possess?' My thinking was further backed up, by specifying that the LEO must only possess or be transferred the gun for "law enforcement duties."

    I don't know if this is the reason or not, but it sure makes sense to me. Also I'm pretty sure the AWB had a similar provision, but I don't feel like looking up the text right now.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page