It sounds like the shop will not make payment to the consignee until the transaction is complete and paid in full from the buyer and that makes perfect business sense. I could be wrong, but it does not sound like the shop is trying to pull a fast one on the consignee.
OK what I think I will do is give the store and the buyer the first 30 days which by my understanding will be up on Friday. I plan on going in to the store and politely see if the gun was picked up and if I can get paid. If they tell me that he has not picked it up yet, I will politely request either to be paid or to get the gun back. I will politely tell them that until I am paid I am the owner of the gun and I am not interested in giving this guy another 30 days.
I don't feel I should have to continue to risk this guy ultimately not picking it up or at best being totally at his mercy as to when I get paid. All this time wasted the gun sits on a shelf in the stores storage room instead of the case where it could have been sold to someone who is going to pick it up in a reasonable amount of time. Sorry my definition of “reasonable” is not 30, 60, or more days. Worst case scenario this goes on for 59 days and he ultimately decides he doesn’t want it. Then what? I get a choice to keep it on consignment or take it back? The gun sat behind a door unable to be purchased by anyone else and I bet I don’t get any part of the restocking fee that will most likely be taken out of this guys refund if he ultimately decides he does not want it after all.
If they insist on giving him any additional time they should assume the risk and pay me off right then. If they say no than I will say they must give me my gun back and refund the guys money OR don't as I really don't care because that transaction is between them and him.
And where is the problem with this?The gun in question was already paid in full and the shop is refusing to give Erica the money until the purchaser actually comes in and picks up the gun.
And where is the problem with this?
The transaction is not complete. If the shop pays the consignee and the buyer fails to complete the purchase, what recourse would the shop have at that point.
This is a simple business transaction, nothing more.
This is why we have a very clear consignment contract that covers the transaction from start to finish and outlines the payment expectations for the consignee. If a consignee expected us to take ownership of the firearm in the event of a failed sale and pay them regardless, I'd politely ask them to take their consignment elsewhere as that's not how we operate.I don't know the intricacies of the California gun laws, but here in the free world, that's just the risk of doing business. The buyer paid for the gun, the seller (the OP) should get her money. If the buyer doesn't or cannot complete the purchase then the gun shop becomes the owner of the pistol (after refunding the original buyer his money, less fees) and it's on them to find a new buyer.
I agree that handling any business worth more than pocket money without a signed contract is reckless in this day and age. Did you consider that maybe the dealer didn't sign a contract because he may have intended to do something he knew he shouldn't be doing (ie taking this poor woman's gun and not paying her when it sold)?This is why we have a very clear consignment contract that covers the transaction from start to finish and outlines the payment expectations for the consignee. If a consignee expected us to take ownership of the firearm in the event of a failed sale and pay them regardless, I'd politely ask them to take their consignment elsewhere as that's not how we operate.
I find it exceptionally hard to believe that there was no signed contract on this consignment, especially in California.
To handle a sale like this without a signed agreement seems reckless this day and age.
That though never entered my mind as I cannot believe that a business would jeopardize their business and licensure over a couple hundred dollars.I agree that handling any business worth more than pocket money without a signed contract is reckless in this day and age. Did you consider that maybe the dealer didn't sign a contract because he may have intended to do something he knew he shouldn't be doing (ie taking this poor woman's gun and not paying her when it sold)?
You entered into a contract with the shop to sell your item. It sounds like they are honoring their side of the contract.Here are the facts as I know them:
1. The buyer purcahsed the gun in March.
2. The store was paid in full by the buyer.
3. The store origianlly gave the buyer 30 days from the day of sale to pick up the gun.
4. I, the consignee, can not get paid until the buyer picks up the gun.
5. If the buyer fails to pick up the gun after 30 days he has to restart the DROS and gets another 30 days to pick up the gun.
6. The origianl 30 days ends at the end of this week.
I plan on giving the buyer until the end of his original 30 days to pick up the gun and for the store to release the funds to me. If the buyer fails to pick up the gun and the store refuses to pay me I will request to terminate the consignment and get the gun back. I feel at that point if the store wants to give the buyer another 30 days they should just pay me off, keep the gun and deal with whatever occurs with the buyer. I think that is more than fair since at the initial consignment agreement it was never stated verbally or in writing that I as the consignor can't get paid until the buyer picks up the gun nor was it ever stated, verbally or in writing, at the initial consignment agreement that the buyer was given up to 60+ days to pick up the gun after it was paid for in full. I feel that it is still my gun untill I get paid for it.
If anyone thinks that is not fair or at least within my right please tell me why.
You may be better off contacting the shop now to inform them of your intention to terminate the consignment contract after the initial 30-day DROS expires. That way they can make a final attempt to get the buyer to complate the sale. At the very least, it would save them the time, effort, paperwork, and cost of initiating a second DROS for the buyer.RCARMS as I have stated I will let the original 30 days go by before asking to be paid or the gun back. Because I was not told about nor did I agree to the 30 60 days pick-up stuff I think I am within my rights to get paid or get the gun back. I am not sure why you think I am wrong. If I was informed of that stuff and agreed to it at the onset than yes I should allow the buyer an unlimited time to pick up the gun. Let's say that I follow your advice, how long should I wait before you think the dealer should poop or get off the pot?