average_shooter
Member
Have you been in the Yellowstone area? Ever?
That's funny, yes I have been there. Multiple times. I've been to many national parks, forests and refuges. And I've seen how well the BLM grows shot up appliances. Having lots of tourists doesn't change the fact that MT and WY are the least populated states in the lower 48.
I work in the natural resources field, so I guess I'm biased. Yeah, I get bitched at by ranchers for doing my job. Apparently eating cold canned soup or MRE's for lunch on a regular basis and a 2001 model year vehicle that I paid roughly half my year's take-home pay for means I'm getting rich off my job.
The NPS does a good job of attracting people to the parks. You know what those people want to see? Because I spent a week in Glacier National Park just a few months ago and about every other person I met on the trail was asking me if I'd seen any Grizzlies or other (mainly predatory) wildlife while they were holding their cameras in hand. They were not asking so they would know where to stay away from, they were asking specifically where they had the best chances of seeing this stuff.
They want to see bears, cats and yes, wolves. They're not there to see the squirrels and chipmunks. Collectively tourists are spending thousands of dollars a day, supporting local economies, spending money in small-town gas stations and hotels, to see the wildlife they don't get to see any other day.
You ever want tourism dollars in your state? National Parks are big draws for domestic and international tourists alike.
I didn't see a single bear or wolf. I did have two deer accost me at a back country campsite because people keep feeding the damn things. I also saw a fox chasing mice behind one of my campsites and came face to face with a cow elk on a trail coming out of the back country. Then there was the bighorn sheep eating shrubs and snorting at the tourists along the trail in the Grinnell Glacier area. All this in an area with a wolf population.
People are paying just as much money for those experiences as they are to shoot elk. (okay, so they don't typically hire expensive guides and outfitters like the hunters do.) The way things have gone with, from what I hear, hunter numbers declining in recent decades, I'd venture to guess more people are scenic tourists than traveling hunters.
Grizzlies and wolves don't do well with people, and know what we have a lot of in the US? Oh yeah, people.
So yeah, every now and then some guy thinks he has become part of the pack and gets himself and his girlfriend eaten by bears. Every now and then a stupid tourist tries to get a picture riding a bison and get his guts strewn across the western states. But if you do not allow for someplace for these animals to be, they've got nowhere.
300 million people in the US, yeah, mostly along the coasts and in the east. There's roughly 6 billion (with a 'B' and nine zeros) people in the world. I guess I don't see where you're going with that. If you want to talk carrying capacity there's plenty of research suggesting humans are at roughly double the planet's carrying capacity for the species.