I ran across this story: http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/09/01/dog.order.ap/index.html, which concerns a man ordered to stay 100 yards from a dog he had been convicted of beating. Essentially, this person has been given a TRO to stay away from the dog.
In Hawaii, anyone on the receiving end of a TRO has to relinquish all their firearms and ammunition for the duration and will have to do the whole permit to acquire thing all over again when the TRO is removed.
Would it apply in this case? Not that I have ANY sympathy for anyone that would beat a dog.
migoi
In Hawaii, anyone on the receiving end of a TRO has to relinquish all their firearms and ammunition for the duration and will have to do the whole permit to acquire thing all over again when the TRO is removed.
Would it apply in this case? Not that I have ANY sympathy for anyone that would beat a dog.
migoi