U.S. Army Mental Health Survey Concerning Private Firearms Ownership

Status
Not open for further replies.

P.O.2010

Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
133
Recently my command required all Soldiers to attend a survey called STARRS conducted by the University of Michigan and the National Institute of Mental Health. Apparently this survey is being conducted Army wide. The survey, which is 90 minutes long, contains a variety of questions concerning one's mental health to include questions about whether the Soldier abuses drugs or alcohol, assaults others, suffers from depression, mania, psychosis or anxiety, has committed war crimes (the survey specifically asks if you have killed non-combatants, unarmed civilians etc) or is a suicide risk. In other words, it is designed to determine the prevalence of harmful, antisocial or psychotic behaviors. The survey was supposedly voluntary, however, when your commander and first sergeant are present and you aren't allowed to leave if you opt out most Soldiers get the unspoken message and understand that rather than volunteering they have been "voluntold".

You can imagine how surprised and displeased I was to find a page dedicated to gun ownership. The survey specifically asks how many guns you own and have in your home. It goes on to ask whether you carry them, the frequency with which you carry them and where you carry them. The survey also goes further specifically asking whether or not you carry other weapons to include black jacks, mace, tasers, knives etc. One question asked whether you carry weapons when going to the grocery store.

The survey's implication was very clear: if you possess privately owned firearms and/or choose to carry them that behavior is an indication of self destructive or homicidal tendencies on the part of the Soldier, something I deeply resent. When I came to the section that wanted me to detail how many weapons I own and how often I carry them I refused to answer and left the questions blank.

I for one am sick and tired of private firearms ownership being portrayed as a sign of mental illness or a predisposition to commit crime. I am also sick and tired of the U.S. military treating its Soldiers like children and criminals. As a Non-Commissioned Officer with an unblemished service record to be asked whether I am war criminal and a drug addict is bad enough but to lump in my choice to carry firearms off post in compliance with all applicable laws and statutes with that type of behavior is disgusting. Apparently the lawful carry of a firearm to defend yourself and your family is an indicator of mental illness and maladjustment. Wonderful.
 
Disgusting but not surprising.

Some UM grad students probably applied for a grant from NIMH and got it. So you have liberal students writing the questions, and NIMH is the big dog forcing participation.

Just off the top of my head, I'm thinking (without actually knowing anything about it) that since the suicide rate among soldiers is high (smaller Army means more soldiers serving multiple tours with less time to decompress between tours) that they may be trying to get a handle on the problem and maybe come up with some strategies to reduce the risk of suicide or develop some 'indicators' that may be shown by those most at risk.

Maybe they'll even develop a way to screen recruits who are most at risk beforehand and either address/correct the problem if possible, put them in non-combatant fields or reject them altogether.

If the above surmise is true, then I see it as a laudable project executed in typical bull-in-a-china-shop governmental style.

I could be wrong.

Of course, back in the 60's they just gave us LSD without our knowledge, so a questionnaire seems pretty tame to me.:D
 
I havent had to take it yet but im sure it will come. I do know that through the weapons registration program he on bliss that your Lt or commander can disarm you at any time. Just a simple memo and all your registered weapons must be locked in the MP or Company arms room. Whether you live on post or off. I havent seen It on a company level, but Ive seen almost a Platoon's worth of guys have to turn all there guns in because the didnt reach a level of training there commander decided was necessary "to have the privilege of private gun ownership". And they wonder why so many NCO and jr Officers are leaving.
 
Maybe they are trying to prevent another Ft. Hood, but if they only gave the questionnaire to members of one religion they would be accused of discrimination...

Dumb either way, of course...
 
Private firearm ownership by military personel did not cause the Ft. Hood tragedy.
 
If the results are anonymous, and participation is required, a lot of the test-takers will take the opportunity to play with the test-givers' heads. Therefore, the tabulated test results will be worthless. This is how we get statistics that say, for example, that the vast majority of high school students don't know who George Washington was. Don't underestimate the intelligence of people, or their secret desire to "stick it to the Man."
 
How do they knowif you are telling the truth or not? Most people who plan to commit crimes would probably lie about it if asked.
 
Anonymous survey who cares. You should have had fun with it. You drink 2gallons of tequila a day, want to have kinky sex with your CO, cross dress, you have killed thousands of unarmed civilains, drive fast, and you have problems telling the truth.

Back a few years ago my girlfriend was recovering from neck surgery and was in a medical company. As senior NCO she had show up for formation every morning at 600am. They saw this a way of preventing suicides. She loved standing out in the cold and damp weather waiting to be dismissed to go home. And no it didnt lower the suicide rate.

Problem is most COs have no clue about how to take care of their folks. In many cases the senior NCOs and warrant officers are jokes and looking for a piece and how to scam the system.

Lack of Leadership is the real problem and not mental health. A good CO takes care of his/her troops. A leader is someone you would gladly follow into combat no matter the consequences. And that may mean you sacrifice your life. You can find many examples on both sides at the Battle of Gettysburg. I met a few good leaders in my 20+ years in the USN.
None of CNOs or Chairman I dealt with had this quality.
 
Last edited:
Simply to play devils advocate:
Given the apparent prevalence of, and general negative institutional attitude toward mental health issues (especially in terms of combat vets, PTSD, readjustment etc), couldnt it be that this survey is an attempt to get a better handle on the ACTUAL prevalence in an effort to better address and help the soldiers who need it?
 
couldnt it be that this survey is an attempt to get a better handle on the ACTUAL prevalence in an effort to better address and help the soldiers who need it?

It could, but with some of the questions being asked, seems fishy. I mean, once they know you have guns, what does it matter if you carry it to the grocery store? Some of the questions seema bit more invasive than they need to be.
 
Yeah... I'd tell them what they DIDN'T want to hear....

Im a perfect angel who would NEVER own a gun.

Doesn't give them anything to cry over.
 
This isn't the first time for STARRS
(Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers)

The Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) is the largest study of mental health risk and resilience ever conducted among military personnel. The study will run through 2014. However, findings will be reported as they become available, so that the Army may apply them to its ongoing health promotion, risk reduction, and suicide prevention efforts

Previous STARRS results can be seen here -
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-new...otential-predictive-factors-for-suicide.shtml

and here -
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topi...artnership-between-nimh-and-the-us-army.shtml

The CURRENT ongoing study of STARRS refered to by the OP is listed here -
http://www.armystarrs.org/

It's goal is...
Army STARRS is the largest study of mental health risk and resilience ever conducted among military personnel.
Beginning in 2011, Army STARRS investigators will look for factors that help protect a Soldier’s mental health and those factors that put a Soldier’s mental health at risk. Army STARRS is a five-year study that will run through 2014; however, research findings will be reported as they become available so that they may be applied to ongoing health promotion, risk reduction, and suicide prevention efforts. Because promoting mental health and reducing suicide risk are important for all Americans; the findings from Army STARRS will benefit not only servicemembers but the nation as a whole.

As stated on the site of the current study -
"A participant's answers will never be shared with anyone in the Army unless the Soldier indicates that s/he is in imminent danger of self-harm or harming someone else"

Finally - according to the site -
"Joining Army STARRS is completely voluntary. Responses and personal information will remain strictly confidential. If researchers invite a Soldier to participate, the Soldier can decide whether or not to do so"

.
 
We had something called the Human Reliability Program when I was in the AF way back in the 70's that was used to transfer a lot of guys out of what they called "sensitive positions" but was used more than a few times to "punish" people who the guy in the upstairs office didn't like, and to reward others. The idea was like this program, to point out those who might be less than reliable in a position of stress, and to keep their fingers off the nuclear button. I don't think there were questions about gun ownership but then that was a long time ago in another galaxy. Point being these questionnaires have been floating around a long time and don't appear to have done a hell of a lot of good.
 
Sheesh, I had my UZI and AK in the ships armory while on West Pac, and the Captain bought Remington 1100s and a pigeon thrower to use of the aft flight deck. It seems to have changed in only 22 years.
 
Don't underestimate the intelligence of people, or their secret desire to "stick it to the Man."

Don't underestimate the statisticians either - they know that a certain percentage of answers are bogus, but most have ways to get around that (larger sample sizes, throwing out of outlying data, etc).

Trust me, the snickering guy who thinks he's ruining an entire survey by lying on it isn't pulling the wool over anyone's eyes. They know about this type of thing, and how to work around it.
 
But surely the majority of those who did devious things like abuses drugs or alcohol, assaults others, suffers from depression, mania, psychosis or anxiety,or committ war crimes would lie about it? No one would risk answering yes to a question that could get them dishonorably discharged or sent to prison even if the test was supposedly anonomous. Their finger prints ate on it! Most criminals and crazies know to keep their mouth shut.
 
reminds me of the bases after fort hood that put up a sign that said

"Terrorists dont register their guns! You arent a terrorist are you?"

or something like that
 
That failure started well above our paygrades

It started with the psychs who not only approved the nutcase for a uniform and a commission, but gave him his degree in spite of a "dissertation" that was many cans short of a six pack. The brass's response to the obvious problem was to promote and transfer him.

So now they're setting up a fall guy--soldiers who own firearms.

I agree though trying to screw up the survey is probably not going to do any damage to it.
 
Last time I was in Iraq, the troops got fed up with surveys, and 1/3 of a company just selected the same answer for every question on a safety survey. I've never heard of this survey. If I do have to take I'll probably have some lifestyle changes shortly before. :evil:

The problems with Privately owned weapons on Bliss are probably Illegal. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 included language that forbade the DOD from interfering with privately owned weapon ownership or use off the installation. The CG of Ft. Richardson referenced it when he rescinded his policy letter prohibiting CCW by soldiers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top