U.S. Soldiers Re-Enlist in Strong Numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
2,290
Location
Arlington, VA
How can this be so? The leftists have assured us that all the US soldiers are defecting to Canada to avoid service. :rolleyes:
_______________________________________________

U.S. Soldiers Re-Enlist in Strong Numbers

By KIMBERLY HEFLING

FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. (AP) - Despite the shrapnel wounds Staff Sgt. William Pinkley suffered during his tour in Iraq, the 26-year-old is joining other soldiers who are re-enlisting at rates that exceed the retention goals set by the Pentagon.

As of March 31 - halfway through the Army's fiscal year - 28,406 soldiers had signed on for another tour of duty, topping the six-month goal of 28,377. The Army's goal is to re-enlist 56,100 soldiers by the end of September.

Pinkley re-enlisted for three more years, citing the camaraderie and the challenge of a new assignment.

"To come out and work with you guys every day, it's a good feeling," Pinkley, 26, told his 101st Airborne Division buddies during the ceremony earlier this month. His wife, Kimberly, watched with a smile, their toddler in her arms.

"It's a very positive retention picture at this point," said Lt. Col. Franklin Childress, an Army public affairs officer. The Army had nearly a half-million active-duty soldiers.

However, Childress cautioned that factors such as an improved economy and the Pentagon's decision to keep about 20,000 troops in Iraq for longer than a year to help quell the violence could change the picture.

Some contend a poor job market and re-enlistment bonuses worth thousands of dollars are keeping soldiers in the Army. Col. Joseph Anderson, commander of the 101st's 2nd Brigade, said it is more about camaraderie, patriotism and duty.

"They've had a personally rewarding and professionally developing experience," Anderson said. "I think they've formed some bonds that are going to last a lifetime. It tends to make them want to stay."

The only Army division to not meet its goal in the six-month period was the 82nd Airborne Division, whose members have been sent to fight in Afghanistan and Iraq since the Sept. 11 attacks. The division wanted to re-enlist 1,221 soldiers, but got only 1,136.

At Fort Campbell, soldiers from the 101st spent seven months in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks. The entire division of about 20,000 soldiers was sent to Iraq last year for major combat, and the last planeload returned home in March. A grueling year in Iraq claimed the lives of 61 Fort Campbell soldiers, and hundreds more were wounded.

In the six-month period ending March 31, the 101st topped its goal of re-enlisting 1,591. It got 1,737 to sign up for another tour of duty.

Fort Campbell leaders said their numbers debunk the theory that yearlong combat-zone assignments - not typically used since Vietnam - and the casualties in Iraq would discourage soldiers from re-enlisting.

Shelley MacDermid, co-director of the Military Family Research Institute at Purdue University, said it is too early to know what effect the war in Iraq will have long-term on recruitment and retention.

"If the war were to end tomorrow, the impact on re-enlistments likely would be very different than three years from now," MacDermid said.

Some soldiers, of course, are getting out, for themselves or for their families. ("There's a saying in the Army - 'You enlist a soldier, but you re-enlist a family' - and that's true," said Command Sgt. Maj. James Plemons, who oversees retention for the 101st.)

Staff Sgt. Bobby Miller, 31, has spent more than 10 years in the Army said he is getting out when his term ends in less than a year. The 101st soldier has served in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq and said he has barely seen his wife and two children in the past few years.

"It's not that we don't want to deploy; I'd like a little more stabilization," Miller said.

Pinkley was riding in a Humvee the day after Thanksgiving when it was rocked by a bomb. He suffered internal injuries and is still healing from the shrapnel wounds. He said he and his wife discussed for more than a year whether he should re-enlist.

In the end, despite his pain and his wife's fear for his life, they decided it was best for both of them, she said. His next position will be as a drill sergeant at Fort Benning, Ga.

"I'm excited about it," his wife said. "It's something he wanted to do. We told him we'd be supportive of him whatever he wanted." As for the possibility of her husband being sent off to a combat zone again, she said: "We would definitely do it again if we had to."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040423/D824LUNO3.html
 
I just re-enlisted (Guard) to put me over 20. It'll be 22, actually.

My wife is about to enlist for the first time at age 35.

We've lost a few people for various reasons, but we're not having trouble getting slots filled.
 
Like I noted in another thread, I talked to some recruiters a week ago or so and they said buisness is REAL good, lots of people waiting for open slots.

So........let's see. We all support and believe in the troops and what they're are doing, and the troops believe strongly enough in what their doing that their re-enlisting in order to finish the job. Seems that the only people that haven't gotten the message that what we're doing is the right thing is the "blame America", freedom hating leftist nutballs.

Seems about par for the course. What miserable, useless, pathetic lives they must lead.
 
If you read alot of the bloggers who get regular email from the troops or even there own Blogs they all say what a great thing it is to be making such a difference in Iraq. Maybe it helps to be fighting the good fight. Not that the leftwing socialist, communist, hate america crowd can understand that.
 
Truth hurts! :D

I loved being a soldier, and I can't wait to get back on active duty as an air force officer. I've talked to lots of soldiers and marines, and every one I've talked to is proud to be there, even if a little nervous about the danger

The only people I've seen saying morale is low are the leftists who aren't in the military, some of which frequent this board.

James
 
..."Any recruiters out there know the max age for prior service to enlist in reserve or NG"


..IIRC it is 35yrs unless they have changed within the past 14yrs..
Anyways I`d go back in a heartbeat, but I gotta figure a way to do it. Kinda got a med.-discharge/honorable(not a skerry type) and an age issue.. Oh well, "where there is a will there is a way"....:)
..And; GOD BLESS the fine men and women of our U.S.A. Military, go with GODS SPEED !:D
 
Iraq duty deters re-enlistment
Posted 4/15/2004 10:33 AM Updated 4/15/2004 10:54 PM
By Dave Moniz, USA TODAY


WASHINGTON — The number of soldiers staying in the Army is falling just as the demand is increasing in Iraq.

Through March 17, nearly halfway through the fiscal year, the Army fell about 1,000 short of meeting its goal of keeping 25,786 soldiers whose enlistments were ending or who were eligible to retire. That works out to a 96% retention rate.

Last year, the retention figure was 106% because more soldiers stayed than the Army had planned. The retention goal assumes that not all eligible to stay will remain.

Military personnel experts have warned that full-time soldiers and members of the Guard and Reserve could begin leaving this year because of the strains of service, including longer and more frequent overseas missions. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld acknowledged Thursday that the Defense Department will extend duty in Iraq beyond one year for 20,000 soldiers. Their time in Iraq will grow as much as 90 days.
…
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-04-15-iraq-troops_x.htm

Note that stop-loss is *still* in effect. Note, also that since most decent paying manufacturring jobs have left or are leaving the country and since many middle-class white-collar jobs have left or are leaving the country and since the GOP leadership is actively trying to speed this process up and is trying to force American salaries lower, for many sections of the country the only halfway decent paying jobs available are in the military.
 
Throwing the BS flag :neener:

96% retention during a war is bad? Despite the hardships, that means that 96% are re-upping. That is much higher than when I was in. I think back then it was in the mid-70 percentile. And it was the recession of the early 80's.

So my glass is 96% full :D
And w4rma's glass is 4% empty :mad:
:neener:

Note, also that since most decent paying manufacturring jobs have left or are leaving the country and since many middle-class white-collar jobs have left or are leaving the country and since the GOP leadership is actively trying to speed this process up and is trying to forces American salaries lower, for many sections of the country the only halfway decent paying jobs available are in the military.

Then how is it that employment keeps rising and the consumer confidence keeps rising? I see more traffic on the road (In SOCal) between 0600 and 2000 hours than I have in years, and this state is definitely just recovering from a government-caused recession).

And I do not know how you feel that the military is decent pay. Have you ever looked? Start under $1,000 per month. After a couple of years you are all the way up to $1,500 per month. people ought to be breaking down the doors for those jobs. And, on top of all that, they get to play in the desert :what: away from friends and family half way across the world.

Could it be that these men and women want to serve their country? And are willing to tolerate the low pay and discomfort out of a sense of duty and honor? I believe so. They hold the torch of freedom.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top