About time! Comment email address at the end of this article. Maybe they'll let the states manage the the wolf populations next, that'd be a big win.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9996768/
WASHINGTON - Noting that the grizzly bear population in the Yellowstone area has thrived in recent years, the Bush administration on Tuesday announced that it plans to remove federal protections for the animals in the areas around the national park.
“A population that was once plummeting towards extinction is now recovered,” Interior Secretary Gale Norton said in making the announcement. “These bears are now no longer endangered” and should be removed from the Endangered Species Act listing.
The Interior Department, through the Fish and Wildlife Service, implements the Endangered Species Act.
“We are sure that these bears will have the habitat that they need,” Norton added.
Significant recovery
Federal wildlife officials estimate that more than 600 grizzly bears live in the region surrounding Yellowstone in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. They also describe as healthy an annual growth rate over the past decade of 4 to 7 percent.
Those numbers represent a significant recovery. Only 200 or 250 grizzlies were in that region in 1975, when grizzly bears in the lower 48 states were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
Once in the hundreds of thousands, the bear population dwindled in the West early in the last century in large part because of hunting and destruction of the animals’ habitat.
If the grizzlies are removed from the list, the three states would assume management responsibilities from federal wildlife officials and have greater flexibility in dealing with bears. Stripping the bears of protection could eventually clear the way for hunting grizzlies in that region.
While grizzlies inside and outside Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks would be delisted, bears within the parks would remain federally protected and could not be hunted.
Activists split
The Interior Department on Tuesday also announced a 90-day comment period before a final decision is made.
But any delisting could be delayed by a court battle, since some conservation groups oppose the move.
Tom France, regional director for the National Wildlife Federation, said his organization believes removing bears from federal protection in the Yellowstone area is long overdue.
“All of the recovery goals for grizzly bears in Yellowstone have been met or exceeded,” he said in a statement Tuesday.
“A sound foundation is in place to ensure that grizzlies continue to thrive after they are released from the emergency room care of the Endangered Species Act,” he added. “Part of that foundation is extensive monitoring so that if problems arise, corrective action can be taken.”
But other environmentalists say the bears still do not have adequate protections to ensure their long-term success.
“The agencies are in a state of denial about what’s happening on the landscape,” said Louisa Willcox, of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Willcox said bear habitat is being chipped away by development, oil and gas drilling, logging and road building. She feared that delisting grizzlies would loosen restrictions on those activities, reducing habitat further and increasing the likelihood of bear-human conflicts.
Four other grizzly populations in other parts of the lower 48 states will continue to be protected as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
Comments on the plan are being accepted through Feb. 16. They may be emailed to [email protected]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9996768/
WASHINGTON - Noting that the grizzly bear population in the Yellowstone area has thrived in recent years, the Bush administration on Tuesday announced that it plans to remove federal protections for the animals in the areas around the national park.
“A population that was once plummeting towards extinction is now recovered,” Interior Secretary Gale Norton said in making the announcement. “These bears are now no longer endangered” and should be removed from the Endangered Species Act listing.
The Interior Department, through the Fish and Wildlife Service, implements the Endangered Species Act.
“We are sure that these bears will have the habitat that they need,” Norton added.
Significant recovery
Federal wildlife officials estimate that more than 600 grizzly bears live in the region surrounding Yellowstone in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. They also describe as healthy an annual growth rate over the past decade of 4 to 7 percent.
Those numbers represent a significant recovery. Only 200 or 250 grizzlies were in that region in 1975, when grizzly bears in the lower 48 states were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
Once in the hundreds of thousands, the bear population dwindled in the West early in the last century in large part because of hunting and destruction of the animals’ habitat.
If the grizzlies are removed from the list, the three states would assume management responsibilities from federal wildlife officials and have greater flexibility in dealing with bears. Stripping the bears of protection could eventually clear the way for hunting grizzlies in that region.
While grizzlies inside and outside Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks would be delisted, bears within the parks would remain federally protected and could not be hunted.
Activists split
The Interior Department on Tuesday also announced a 90-day comment period before a final decision is made.
But any delisting could be delayed by a court battle, since some conservation groups oppose the move.
Tom France, regional director for the National Wildlife Federation, said his organization believes removing bears from federal protection in the Yellowstone area is long overdue.
“All of the recovery goals for grizzly bears in Yellowstone have been met or exceeded,” he said in a statement Tuesday.
“A sound foundation is in place to ensure that grizzlies continue to thrive after they are released from the emergency room care of the Endangered Species Act,” he added. “Part of that foundation is extensive monitoring so that if problems arise, corrective action can be taken.”
But other environmentalists say the bears still do not have adequate protections to ensure their long-term success.
“The agencies are in a state of denial about what’s happening on the landscape,” said Louisa Willcox, of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Willcox said bear habitat is being chipped away by development, oil and gas drilling, logging and road building. She feared that delisting grizzlies would loosen restrictions on those activities, reducing habitat further and increasing the likelihood of bear-human conflicts.
Four other grizzly populations in other parts of the lower 48 states will continue to be protected as threatened species under the Endangered Species Act.
Comments on the plan are being accepted through Feb. 16. They may be emailed to [email protected]