Hmmm, interesting. Maybe there's something I'm missing - I still don't get it. Why on earth would I pay for two when I could pay for one? And for that matter, why would I pay for
one from my home state, at a higher fee, than
one from Utah, with a lower fee?
If my state is all-fired stupid enough to:
1) Charge a lot more for the permit fee;
AND nevertheless STILL
2) Grant reciprocity to a state that it KNOWS allows non-resident permits
then they should reap the rewards of that asinine policy, by losing out on some fees.
If a Utah permit alone makes me perfectly legal, I see it as my moral duty to help reveal to my state how stupid they are, by not paying for their exhorbitant license fee. Which I'm of course more than happy to do given that I shouldn't be paying a thin dime to ANYONE, in light of the fact that the second amendment to the US Constitution gives me the right to carry.
But as I say, maybe I'm missing something - as per usual, I am very
.
Some states do not have reciprocity with permits that were not issued from your home state.
Then by definition, that means they do not allow reciprocity, period.
Do you mean, that for example, some states might allow reciprocity for Utah resident permits, yet NOT allow reciprocity for Utah NON-resident permits? If so, then that's the reason right there, but I'd never heard of that ....