Utah man jailed in NJ for transporting firearm files $3M Suit

Status
Not open for further replies.

mountainclmbr

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
On top of a mountain in Colorado
Gun laws: The arrest over a weapon for which he had a permit fuels a $3M suit


By Glen Warchol
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune

BOUNTIFUL - When Gregg Revell packed his bags for a trip to Pennsylvania last April, he had no idea how far he'd be traveling.

Before the week was out, the 57-year-old suburban real estate agent and grandfather would be arrested, thrown into one of the country's most notorious jails, strip searched and inoculated against his will. The soft-spoken Utah native would be on his way to becoming a poster child for the National Rifle Association in a $3 million lawsuit. During a nearly five-day stay in a Newark, N.J., jail, he would meet a terrifying side of America that most Utahns see only on television and briefly would become a jailhouse mentor to drug dealers and violent criminals.

It started as a trip to pick up a BMW in Allentown, Pa., for a relaxing road trip back to Utah. "I fix them up and sell them," Revell says. "Sometimes I make a profit. It's something I do for fun."

Revell, who has a Utah concealed weapon permit, usually takes a handgun with him for protection on his car trips. Transporting a firearm in your luggage across country on an airline is not illegal, but involves some paperwork. Revell who has made a couple dozen such car-buying trips, knows the process. He fills out the Federal Aviation Administration paperwork, packs his .45 caliber pistol in a locked case, his hollow-point ammunition in another locked case and puts both in his checked luggage. He declares the gun to the ticketing agents. "Sometimes I get a look, but it's never been a problem," he says.

Unfortunately, for Revell, his Allentown trip required a change of planes in Newark, N.J.

His plane was late arriving in Newark Liberty Airport and he missed his connection. Five hours later, he found himself boarding an airline chartered bus for Allentown, 90 miles away. Revell also discovered his luggage had not made the connection. Northwest Airline agents apologized that his bags had been mismarked to stop in Newark. By the time he tracked the bags down, his bus had left and he was stuck overnight in New Jersey. When he returned to the airport the next morning, April Fools' Day, and rechecked his bags -- again declaring his handgun and ammunition -- he was stopped by security officers of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. "I wasn't the least bit nervous," Revell says. "I was only nervous about missing another flight."

Despite his explanations, Utah concealed weapon permit and his FAA document, Revell missed the flight because he was arrested and handcuffed: "I have never been arrested before. I have never felt anything degrading like that in my life."

"You don't have a permit to carry a gun in New Jersey," a Port Authority officer told him, according to Revell. "And you don't have a permit to carry hollow-point ammunition."

"I asked an officer if this had something to do with April Fool's Day," Revell remembers. "He said it most certainly did not."

In 1986, Congress passed the Firearm Owners Protection Act (FOPA) for citizens who are transporting firearms through various jurisdictions. "Law abiding citizens who happened to wander into anti-gun jurisdictions could wind up being harassed and imprisoned," says Scott Bach, a New York-based attorney and member of the NRA board of directors. "FOPA was passed to end abuses." Under the law, a citizen can transport an unloaded gun between two jurisdictions that don't prohibit it -- as long as it is locked in a hard case with the ammunition locked in a separate hard case, "regardless of what local law says," explains Bach. The law is routinely violated in "anti-gun" jurisdictions, Bach says, notably New York, Los Angeles and New Jersey. Revell soon found himself in Newark's Essex County Jail.

"It is the lowest, it is the worst and it has the most hardened criminals of any correctional facility in the nation," says Bach. "It is horrific." Revell, who would spend nearly four days in the jail, agrees. "The jailers asked me, 'What the heck did you do to be in here?' They felt bad for me. But there was nothing they could do." A judge set his bail at $15,000 and required the amount be paid in cash, not through the usual bail-bond arrangement. "It's tough to come up with $15,000 on a weekend," Revell says. While his family back in Utah got the money together, he spent nearly five days in jail, sometimes in holding cells crowded with 28 other prisoners. "People were passed out on the floor in their own vomit," he says. Prisoners were strip-searched in an a public room.

"For the only person with a white butt in a jail with 1,000 people, it was not a good situation," he says. "I could have given some people some ideas." Revell figured that for survival, "I'd better make friends as fast as I could." He listened to the hard luck stories of his cell mates. "I would give them encouragement because a lot of them weren't very happy to be there. Because I was older than everybody, I was known as 'Pop.'"

Everyone knew he was in on a gun charge, and some prisoners assumed it was for a violent crime. "They all talked jive. It was hard for me to understand," Revell says. Until one of them asked him, "How many people did you waste?"

After a heart-to-heart with the prisoner, the man asked Revell if he would get him guns. "He would give me a great price." Several prisoners befriended Revell despite the suburbanite's many faux pas, such as asking about their tattoos. "There are some tattoos you just don't ask about," he says. "But some people would stand up for me if there was a problem."

His jail savvy friends told him they were in a tuberculosis quarantine for a few days, but after testing would join the rest of the jail. "We can't protect you when we get in with the general population," his friends warned Revell. "That scared me." Hours before being transferred into the general prison population, a bail bonds employee finally showed up with the bail money. Ultimately, the bail was lowered, but by the time he had met the bail bond company's requirement that he pay in advance for a bounty hunter to track him back to Utah if necessary, Revell was out $20,000. He was also 10 pounds lighter and had a blister on his arm from a tuberculosis inoculation. But he was free. "I took the best shower of my life."

Within two months, prosecutors dismissed the charges against him. New York and New Jersey Port Authority officials did not respond to requests for an interview.

But the Utahn's story had come to the NRA's attention. The NRA is funding the $3 million lawsuit filed in January in federal court in New Jersey against the Port Authority. Revell and the Association of New Jersey Rifle and Pistol Clubs are co-defendants. Though he had grown up in a hunting family and had a concealed weapon permit, Revell had never been a guns-rights activist or even a member of the NRA. "I am now," he says. "As is my wife." The $3 million damage figure was set to make sure the case gets the attention of airports across the country, says Bach, who is president of the New Jersey gun clubs association. "Unfortunately, that's the way things work," Revell says. "We want to get the laws adhered to or get new laws made if we need to do that. If I should win, a fair amount of the settlement will go to the NRA as a donation."

Revell never got his .45 back; Essex County never responded to his lawyers' requests.

But he did drive the BMW home from Allentown despite his traumatic experience.

"My family offered to fly me home," Revell says. "But I told them I needed a few days to clear my head. It was good to have a little thinking time."





Mountainclmbr comment: I favor suing state thugs personally. Those who violate constitutional rights and those who vote on unconstitutional laws. Three million against each involved, plus 1+ years in prison seems fair to me. A state suit to punish citizens who voted for these stalinists would also be good, but it should be big enough to be a real punishment. I would ask for 1 year's salary from every resident. They can then sue to recover from the thug politicians if they can prove they did not vote for them.
 
This is awesome. Glad to see the NRA Legal Defense Fund in action.

This is a completely obvious miscarriage of justice and I hope they throw the book at NJ. And I hope they dont try to do a deal. We need precedent on the books.
 
This was posted on earlier.

Those thugs in New Jersey need to be shown Federal law trumps state and local laws.

Even Jon Corzine oughtta appriciate that!
 
When a state has ignored the 2nd amendment in every imaginable way, violating a federal law is no issue. I hope he wins every penny, then sues them for not returning his gun too.

Just because they want to make their citizens live as unarmed subjects dosnt mean the rest of us should suffer for it.
 
I had something similar happen and it took a while to get my gun returned.
I had to threaten a filing in federal court after the original BS charge was
dismissed. I told the primary officer involved that this would take place in
my home state and he would be required to travel there and testify. :)

About two weeks later, my firearm was returned at a mutually agreed place
that was of much more convenience for the officer's travel than mine.
 
The real venue for this kind of thing is criminal charges under the Civil Rights Act. Individual public servants and officials need to be liable to face criminal charges and penalties for these kind of things.
--------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org
 
This is why the political class in Nazi Jersey is despised and why when one of their running dog enforcers is "processed" the event is celebrated, not mourned.
 
Well, that is an informative story in a lot of ways....

1) We learn the 1986 FOPA did do some good things for gun owners.

2) We learn that the NRA does help out gun owners on occasion, even when they couldn't be bothered to support the NRA.

3) We learn that under FOPA, agencies that violate its provisions can be sued for civil damages.
 
Bart - here is an alternate view.

1. We learn that NRA has ignored transgressions of the FOPA for 20 years.
2. We learn that NRA is willing to help non-members from out of state instead of dues paying members from within the restrictive state.
3. Anybody can sue for just about anything. Doesn't mean they are going to win.


Edit: I reread the complaint. Nowhere is the NRA mentioned. The suit was filed by Revell and the ANJRPC. I have to assume that the members of the ANJRPC are footing the legal bills here.
 
Last edited:
Are any of the RKBA orgs participating in the lawsuit? Who is ANJRPC?
It looks like a good opportunity to set some precendent.

We really should be careful about eating our own on RKBA issues.

1. How do you know that?
2. I guess only NRA member should have the RKBA. How would this federal law help NJ residents in NJ?
3. They should just drop the suit now since they won't win. No point in fighting the inevitable right?

4. I guess I am combative this morning. :)
 
I doubt this lawsuit will help any NJ residents. Nor NY residents who travel thru LaGuardia or JFK airports.

Let's see how much my ANJRPC dues go up.

PS: I see Scott Bach is an attorney. Does he have any financial interest in this case?
 
This is why the political class in Nazi Jersey is despised and why when one of their running dog enforcers is "processed" the event is celebrated, not mourned.

Indeed. The unlawful arrest, sentencing, and jail term were gross violations of Natural Law. $3 million? Why not $3 billion, enough to bankrupt Essex County and Nazi Jersey?
 
Yeah; the suit should have been for a lot more. Then, the parties could have settled for a lot more. I'd put it in the settlement that I want a new, super-duper, custom Kimber .45 out of it.
 
1. We learn that NRA has ignored transgressions of the FOPA for 20 years.

Where? The NRA Legal Defense Fund has been aiding victims of this particular FOPA issue for some time now - in fact you can find NRA-ILA alerts on the topic going back several years. The practice seems to be limited to post 9/11, so I don't think the NRA has been ignoring this for 20 years; but I am willing to read contrary info on the subject/

2. We learn that NRA is willing to help non-members from out of state instead of dues paying members from within the restrictive state.

Were there dues-paying members in the same situation who didn't get any assistance you can document?

3. Anybody can sue for just about anything. Doesn't mean they are going to win.

For somebody who is so cynical about the NRA, I'm amazed that you missed the tendency of the NRA not to bet on a particular horse until it has darn near crossed the finish line with a substantial lead. That alone should be a pretty clear indicator of where that lawsuit is going. They should win handily.
 
Baron - Revell was arrested, arraigned before a judge, and held until bail was made. He was not tried or sentenced nor did he receive a jail term.

The State of NJ is not on the hook here. The Port Authority is. The PA was set up by the state and federal government as an 'independent' entity. Some corporate lawyer type could better explain.


Bart - please show me where the NRA has helped a NJ NRA member. In my 40 years of NRA membership I cannot remember any. NJ is a cash cow for the NRA.

This problem has been going on a long time. Locally, it is well known. I didn't save newspaper clippings of incidents at EWR. Surely, the NRA Legal Dept. with its records systems could post a couple of 'saves' they were involved in... if they ever were.

I remember Mas Ayoob talking about the time he was rousted at LaGuardia by the PA cops. The only thing that saved his skinny a** from the slammer was his badge.
 
Bart - please show me where the NRA has helped a NJ NRA member. In my 40 years of NRA membership I cannot remember any. NJ is a cash cow for the NRA.

James Hammer (New Jersey). He is a sergeant in the New Jersey National Guard. His pistol and firearms purchaser identification card were seized based on a domestic violence accusation by his estranged wife. He opted to have the pistol sold and be the beneficiary to the proceeds of the sale. The prosecutor advised him that his consent to the sale would not prohibit him from obtaining a firearms purchaser identification card. On August 25, 2004, the wife's temporary restraining order against him was dismissed. He subsequently applied for a new card. The card was denied on April 1, 2005. The issue is whether a firearms purchaser identification card can be denied solely because his pistol was not returned to him. An appeal was filed in the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division. The appellant's brief was filed on July 6, 2005. His reply brief was filed on September 20, 2005.

Mark Tullo (N.J.). He was charged on May 5, 2001, with unlawful possession of large capacity ammunition magazines. He possessed the magazines together with dummy devices resembling firearms. However, the statute requires that the ammunition magazines be for a semiautomatic firearm. His argument is that he broke no law because he possessed no firearms. Furthermore, penal statutes are to be narrowly construed and any ambiguity is to be resolved in favor of the defendant. The case was postponed numerous times. On May 9, 2003, the court granted a defense motion to suppress evidence seized without a warrant from his home. The superior court of Passaic County ordered on June 30, 2003, that all charges be dismissed. On March 18, 2005, the court granted Mr. Tullo's motion for return of property. The court held the state failed to meet its burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the gun part kits and the ammunition magazines are prima facie contraband.

Assn. of N.J. Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Moms for Gun Safety, & Others v. Board of Education of Montclair Township (N.J.). This lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court alleging a violation of First Amendment rights when the board of education allowed fliers to be distributed supporting an agenda opposed to firearm possession by civilians but refused to allow the distribution of literature supporting a contrary point of view. This was part of a pattern and practice by the board. On May 20, 2003, a settlement agreement was announced. The school district will distribute three leaflets promoting the plaintiffs' education and training events for women and children. The plaintiffs also will have access to the school system to conduct events, essay contests, grant scholarships, and seek establishment of a student club.

Stephen R. Miller (N.J.). He was a police officer against whom domestic violence charges were dismissed as unfounded. Nonetheless, the prosecutor wanted him to attend a batterers group as a condition of being allowed to carry off duty firearms and to possess personally owned firearms. He filed a civil lawsuit challenging that request. He appeared in Essex County Superior Court on September 13, 2002. The court set a timetable for depositions. On January 21, 2003, the defendants filed their answer to plaintiff's complaint. The defendants removed the case to U.S. District Court. The fund was advised on February 3, 2004, that presently there is no impediment to Mr. Miller possessing or acquiring a firearm. A permit to purchase a pistol was issued to him. His attorney filed a letter memorandum arguing his client has a valid constitutional claim on February 9, 2004, in the U.S. District Court.

Marc Weiss (N.J.). He was initially denied his application for a New Jersey firearms identification card and a permit to purchase a pistol because a restraining order was issued against him on October 2, 1996. This was based on a clerical error. He then hired an attorney and appealed to the Essex County Superior Court. Judge Joseph C. Cassini issued an order granting him his application for a New Jersey firearms identification card and a permit to purchase a pistol on November 16, 2004.

Source
 
The suit may be helpful to many of us.

Maybe this is just what's needed to make NJ and others like it start obeying the following law. You put yourself at risk anytime you 'expect' this law to protect you.

§ 926A. Interstate transportation of firearms

Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000926---A000-.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top