http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COZm7uCCjHM
It's weird, because it's not a bank or a store. It's a tax preparation business office.
It's weird, because it's not a bank or a store. It's a tax preparation business office.
Agreed. That lady was lucky she was on the ground when the guard shot through the wall.It turned out well, but shooting through the wall with friendlies down range is very unsafe. While it isn't a surprise the suspects were not hit, it was equally surprising the friendly wasn't hit.
Bingo! Smart, very smart.Well so much for the premise that no one uses an AR-15 for defensive purposes, right?
It turned out well, but shooting through the wall with friendlies down range is very unsafe. While it isn't a surprise the suspects were not hit, it was equally surprising the friendly wasn't hit.
Oh, but he did exercise restraint.
Or did you miss the news when the LAPD fired over 40 rounds into a vehicle from AR-15s with two old ladies delivering newspapers on the hunt for Mr. Droner . . . who wasn't shooting at them at the time?
This security agent got shot in the leg and shot, what, 2 rounds they said?
Yeah, but remember we're told that these AR-15s with "high capacity mags" fire what, dozens of rounds in a few seconds, right?
He fired two.
Sounds like he exercised some restraint to me.
I'm also not convinced he was firing blindly through the wall. I'd be willing to bet that he had eyes on his target through the doorway, and simply missed (possibly due to being hit?)
He shot THROUGH the wall with an AR?
Haven't there been several threads recently where proponents of using ARs for "home defense" denied that a round from an AR would penetrate a wall?
Let me tell you what I see.
I see a security guard who, 4 seconds after being shot, acquires his target and returnes fire with 2 rounds. One through the doorway and one that grazed it, under return fire.