Virginia couple fight companies using politically correct term 'holiday'

Status
Not open for further replies.
The greater point in this discussion is that a segment of the population, that very segment that has bequeathed the most, culturally and philosophically, to this nation and its institutions, is also the segment that is being marginalized by corporate and judicial fiat.

O I really want to see concrete examples of that statement..lets keep score...

How baout this one..that segment of the population that has done the most to destroy what this country has been founded on is also the segment that is being marginalized...

WildgetrealAlaska
 
You can start with the Declaration of Independence. You can then go on to the full corpus of Law and see what principles it embodies. You could then witness our traditional holidays, one in particular, the topic of this thread. Our sense of individual, natural rights which are at the forefront of our consciousness. Our literary traditions, our architecture, our outward manifestations of culture, such as dress, speech, demeanor, manners. Our adherence to the Golden Rule, to this day, in most respects. Our belief that the world is revealed to us by a Creator, therefore decipherable, and the consequent magnificent, unprecedented steps in science that issue forth from such a fundamental and unique belief. Our belief that man should be master of his own affairs. Our cultivated sense of beauty, which is not innate but fruit of our cultural inheritance, and fruit of generations who saw fit to transmit ideals of beauty to subsequent generations...I'll stop for now, or I'll bore the pants off people.
 
as someone who has never celebrated any holiday, it has NEVER offended me to have someone wish me a 'merry christmas', 'happy easter', 'happy new year', 'happy halloween', or 'good day'.
i can simply say 'thank you, you too'.

besides, anyone who has done their research knows that christmas was originally a day used to celebrate the sun god by pagans, and that christ wasnt born in december.

and all those nativity scenes that everyone puts up? should feature people that have dark skin, dark eyes, as christ and his family werent fair skinned, but rather would appear very much like the terrorists being killed in the middle east.

aint i a stinker? :evil:
 
Our belief that the world is revealed to us by a Creator, therefore decipherable, and the consequent magnificent, unprecedented steps in science that issue forth from such a fundamental and unique belief.

Uh...no.

Scientific progress has always been at odds with established theology. The history of Western civilization shows unequivolcally that science has made the broadest inroads when the influence of religion was lessened.

It is my personal belief that we would be a thousand years ahead, if the Church hadn't dragged our best minds back by the coattails in the Middle Ages to burn them at the stake.

The biggest quantum leaps in scientific achievement were made by the Romans and the Greeks. Our Renaissance ("rebirth") merely revived the classical thinking, and the reliance on logic and reason to explain the world. The Renaissance dragged our civilization out of 1,000 years of cruel, bloody ignorance and superstition, and the Church opposed it all the way. It took them until the 20th Century to apologize to freakin' Galileo, for crying out loud.
 
"The greater point in this discussion is that a segment of the population, that very segment that has bequeathed the most, culturally and philosophically, to this nation and its institutions, is also the segment that is being marginalized by corporate and judicial fiat."

You feel MARGINALIZED because someone says "Happy Holidays" to you instead of Merry Christmas?

Are you serious?

HOW are you being marginalized?

Can't find a plastic Santa for your lawn, or a Glitter & Glow Baby Jesus for the creche on your lawn at the local Shop & Rob?

Are you now forced to sing "Uncorporeals beings we have heard on high" instead of Angels we have heard on high?

No one is marginalizing you or the rest of the White Christians (apparent paranoids) by using Happy Holidays. As someone else has already pointed out, Holiday is a variation on HOLY Day, a term used in the Christian church for what, perhaps 1,500 years?

There are a lot of things to feel marginalized about, but WalMart wishing its customers a Happy Holidays instead of a Merry :cuss:ing Christmas isn't one of them!
 
"and all those nativity scenes that everyone puts up? should feature people that have dark skin, dark eyes, as christ and his family werent fair skinned, but rather would appear very much like the terrorists being killed in the middle east."

Oh lord, you've done it now...

Spiff, I've told you repeatedly, never, EVER tell people that Baby Jesus didn't have blond hair, blue eyes, and instead of tanning in the Galilee sun, burned like a lobster. You'll be accused of heinous things...
 
You feel MARGINALIZED because someone says "Happy Holidays" to you instead of Merry Christmas?
Uh...where, pray tell, did I ever mention feelings in my post? I described a marginalization of the dominant culture by corporate and judicial oligarchies. This marginalization occurs when judges and corporations forbid the display of the outward and public expressions of that culture. You can argue legitimately whether my assessment is right or not, but my feelings have nothing to do with it, nor would I feel compelled to share them with you. In fact, I face this phenomenon with the utmost serenity because deep down I see it as an ultimately unsustainable trend - perhaps wishful thinking, but nonetheless it's how I approach these events.

Merry Christmas, Michael
 
Scientific progress has always been at odds with established theology. The history of Western civilization shows unequivolcally that science has made the broadest inroads when the influence of religion was lessened.
That's a legitimate point of argument. I look more at the role of the Christian weltenschaaung than I do at specific events or individual acts in history, but I understand where you're coming from.
 
dischord

Oh, and speaking of refresher courses, the Mayflower Compact wasn't the first document penned on American shores. http://jefferson.village.virginia.e...licrecords.html
Ah, yes, and I was especially impressed with the fact that they have a page entirely dedicated to my being able to search the records of Christ's Hospital. http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vcdh/jamestown/christs_hospital/search_ch.html

I'm sure, however, that the "Christ" they refer to is a distant relation to Judith Christ. The proof is HERE, of course.
 
Let ME stir the pot a little

....just wanted to jump in before the thread slammed shut.

I didn't find the John Adams quote you wanted but I did find this one:

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, -- as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-- and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religous opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

[John Adams, 1797-05-27, Article 11, Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the US and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary. Treaties and Other International Acts of America, ed. Hunter Miller]


...but I guess we can trash that one now. Sorry, John.

I actually just wanted to share my favorite Kwanzaa quote. When I was doing my disastrous year teaching special ed fourth grade in public school, I thought it would be really cool to do Kwanzaa for social skills, since Kwanzaa, being basically made up, is non-religious and therefore wide open. Also the principles of Kwanzaa (self-determination, responsibility, cooperation, unity etc.) are perfect for social skills class, right? I make my announcement in class and this is the reaction I get from a ten year old black kid:

"Uh-uh! No way! If World War Two taught us anything, it's that you can't trust the Chinese -- and that's why I'll never celebrate Kwanzaa!":confused:

Once I picked my head up off the desk, we had a lovely Kwanzaa lesson.
 
I still think there is a difference between being offended by someone else expressing their religion, and being offended because people are trying to hide or erase a major part of the culture of the majority of the people.

And I expect this would also offend the minority-religions, as it tends to imply that they are narrow-minded and easily offended.
Now hold on just a second ...
Saying "Happy Holidays" to everyone implies that non-Christmas celebrators* are narrow-minded and easily offended? But when Christmas celebrators whine about some businesses not wanting to offend anyone by using a neutral phrase, the stalwart defenders of "Merry Christmas" are somehow not narrow-minded and easily offended?

Look, if you want to avoid businesses that say "Happy Holidays" instead of your preferred December greeting, that's certainly your prerogative, but I don't see how it would be any less silly than me avoiding stores that say "Merry Christmas" because I don't celebrate Christmas, or throwing your friendly greeting back in your face because I don't have an evergreen in my living room right now.

Some of you have an interesting outlook on things. Just because you support "Merry Christmas" means that everyone must pander to you, and that anyone who doesn't must be trying to steal Christmas? Preposterous.

* As others have pointed out, Christians do not necessarily celebrate Christmas - much of my family included.
 
Ah, yes, and I was especially impressed with the fact that they have a page entirely dedicated to my being able to search the records of Christ's Hospital. http://jefferson.village.virginia.e.../search_ch.html

I'm sure, however, that the "Christ" they refer to is a distant relation to Judith Christ. The proof is HERE, of course.
I'm not sure what the name of a place in England has to do with anything. :confused:
And that gives the impression that "nation" and "state" are interchangeable terms.
Valid point. :)
As others have pointed out, Christians do not necessarily celebrate Christmas - much of my family included.
And many (most?) Americans celebrating Christmas can be called Christians only nominally. I bet that a majority of people opening gifts tomorrow haven't set foot in a church in years and many of them probably won't think of Christ at all the whole day. Perhaps refraining from applying "Christmas" to the the December 25 gift giving celebration makes sense on another level :(
 
Now hold on just a second ...
Saying "Happy Holidays" to everyone implies that non-Christmas celebrators* are narrow-minded and easily offended? But when Christmas celebrators whine about some businesses not wanting to offend anyone by using a neutral phrase, the stalwart defenders of "Merry Christmas" are somehow not narrow-minded and easily offended?

I just meant that saying "You shouldn't say 'Happy Christmas' because it will offend other religions" is implying that other religions are narrow-minded.


I don't mind what people celebrate, or chose not to celebrate, or invite me to celebrate, or wish me a happy one of. I just don't like people saying "You shouldn't publicly celebrate x".


Mind you, you do have a good point about looking at it from the other perspective, and the whole thing probably has been blown out of proportion.

I'll sign off now, before my brain implodes from contradictory thoughts :eek:
 
Try and play nice, and don't let the fact that I don't agree with you in matters of theology influence your attitude.
What are my theological views? I don’t recall ever sharing them with you, nor do I plan to, nor do I believe this discussion to be a theological one but rather a discussion of history.

The Puritans shipped out to the New World because of theological disagreements with the religion of the establishment. They did not support the Church of England, which Henry VIII created not too long before. In essence, they left the country because they didn't want to adhere to a "state religion" which they found highly objectionable.
I hate repeating myself. The Puritans did not come to the new world because of "theological disagreements with the religion of the establishment". They went to Holland for that reason. William Bradford himself (you know, the Puritan leader for 35 years) gave four reasons why they left for the new world and not one of them was to escape the church of England. Obviously you won’t take my word for it so read his.

The Bill of Rights recognizes your right to celebrate Christmas in your own way. It also recognizes my next-door neighbor's right to celebrate Winter Solstice instead, and my Jewish friends' right to celebrate something they call Hanukkah. I have no interest in forbidding anyone from celebrating the religious holiday of their choice, and I'd never think about telling them to "go back to where you came from" if they don't celebrate mine.
I don’t disagree with you on this point. That wasn’t what you and I were discussing though, was it?
 
New England religious intolerance, as well as that found in Maryland in the 1600s and early 1700s, goes a LONG way in explaining why the Founding Fathers and the Framers eschewed adopting an official religion in the United States.
I have read quite a few letters, books, and histories of the Founding Fathers and Framers and I have never found anything penned by them that would substantiate this belief. Of course, I am always happy to expand my knowledge of history, so would you be so kind as to provide your documentation of this view?
 
I just meant that saying "You shouldn't say 'Happy Christmas' because it will offend other religions" is implying that other religions are narrow-minded.
I know what you meant. But what does saying "You shouldn't say 'Happy Holidays because it will offend Christmas celebrators." imply about those Christmas celebrators? Or does the same logic not apply to Santa's Soldiers?

I hope everyone enjoys whatever activities they decide to take part in this week. I plan on catching up on my shooting among other things.
 
"Uh...where, pray tell, did I ever mention feelings in my post? I described a marginalization of the dominant culture by corporate and judicial oligarchies. This marginalization occurs when judges and corporations forbid the display of the outward and public expressions of that culture."

Obviously if this is on your radar to this point you identify with it, Romulus. You feel it at some level, or it wouldn't be an issue for you.

And I've yet to hear how wishing someone a Happy Holiday is an indication of marginalizing them.

Once again, stores haven't stopped carrying Christmas items -- they've simply added Hannukah and other holiday items. Maybe that's a cross etho-religious marginalization because holiday symbols of both faiths are displayed together, and Jews are wished a Happy Holidays instead of a Merry Christmas?

Stores haven't stopped decorating with overtly religious symbols -- the local WalMart has a creche, angels AND a Menorah prominently on display, along with all of the secular trappings of the holiday.

Simple fact is that judicial rulings and corporate moves have largely addressed ALL displays of religious significance -- No creche on town property, no Menorah.

Interestingly enough, I came through my hometown last night on my way to my parent's house and in Victory Park there's a display of 3 angels. I guess no one told the town of the marginalization effort.


Here's a sad fact for you, and everyone else who's moaning about being wished a happy Holy Day instead of a Merry Christmas...

Christmas is still the only religious holiday recognized by Federal, state, and local governments with time off.

Christmas has also largely ceased to be a religious holiday to the vast majority of Americans -- it's a secular gift frenzy.

Interestingly enough, in the time of the Founding Fathers, Christmas was largely... a secular party frenzy. It wasn't overtly religious. In fact, in New England in the early days of the colonies, Christmas was outlawed.
 
Obviously if this is on your radar to this point you identify with it, Romulus. You feel it at some level, or it wouldn't be an issue for you.
The fact that I identify with it, notice it on my radar screen, whatever, doesn't mean that I, on a personal level, feel marginalized. However, in spite of your anecdotes, it's really kind of disingenuous to suggest that there is no effort to hush references to Christianity in American life. I've been living in the United States since 1974, and the difference since is dramatic.
 
I don't like bible-thumping at all; however people that are christians are in most cases nice people. America has no official religian at all. They are just stores. If they want to do it its their right. You would think on a board with so many libertarians everyone would see that. Its not like your local publik skool teacher is making 6 yearolds give up Jesus.
 
For me its those damn BELLS!

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Enough with the bells

Ding Ding Ding Ding

I can't stand the bells

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Stop those damn bells

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Ovey the bells!

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Must reach for gun

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Must shoot the bells

Ding Ding Ding Ding

Damn I left the saftey on

Ding Ding Ding Ding

If I do this I might go to hell

Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding

Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding

Put gun under chin

Ding Ding Ding Ding


BANG

No more bells.
 
Ummmm, isn't it the thought that counts??

I mean, I 'm happy enough to greet my Jewish friends with "Happy Channuka"(sp?), "merry Christmas" for my Christian acquaintances, "Happy Kwanza" if I see you're wearing your kinte cloth, or maybe just "Happy Holidays" if I don't have a clue whiat holiday you dig. I certainly wouldn't wish someone the joy of the season (whatever season), in order to offend, and I don;t think others would do so, either.

I don't take offense if someone offers me good wishes consistent with their beliefs, in fact, I'm flattered, and I appreciate anyone wishing me well. Seeing someone exercise their religion also doesn't offend me (as long as it doesn't involve blocking my lane in traffic or dousing my doorstep in animal blood, etc:evil: ) as long as they're respectfuul, I will be too.

As Mr Irwin pointed out, we are becoming a more pluralistic society, with more choices of holidays (and sometimes, more holiday parties:D :D :D ).

Fortunately, there seems to be a lot that occur around year end, and 'christmas' has secularized (some might say crassly) to become 'the holiday season' to cover them all. Live with it.

Afterall, if you were really intend on celebrating Christ's birthdate accurately, you'd be doing it in the Spring, right (like sometime in April?). Otherwise, it's just another religious fraud co-opting the pagan holidays by overlaying Christ's coming with the solistice to sucker in the Druids and other pagans.:neener: :neener:
 
Y'all are wack. Holidays are good times. More holidays=better. Stop looking for reasons to feel morally indignant. Have a drink and wish someone well. Or go to hell. I don't care which. I'm just sick of folks who store up reasons to be pissed off like treasures from King Solomon's mines. Happy holidays to all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top