slickracer
Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Messages
- 254
Smith & Wesson Mod 19.
Not sure how to tell, Gun Master. Will these two pics help? Were you thrown off course by the polished trigger and hammer? I did that myself, in violation of my "don't touch milsurps" rule. It really jazzed up the guns looks. For the measly sum I paid for it, why not!
The word "год" means "year" in Russian, and is pronounced as "god" (pronounced with a long O sound). It does not mean "in the year of our Lord" or anything like that. The Russian word for "God" is "Бог", pronounced "bog".tark, you've got a Izhevsh 1944 "year of God" (the little r looking symbol), like we'd say "The year of our Lord".
As far as polishing the hammer and trigger, I'd say "you done good".
It's your gun, correct? Do what you want with your guns. Looks good.
It has been said that if anything went wrong with the 1895 Nagant, they'd fix it with a hammer.Yes, it is a very durable revolver, no matter "how great" it may or may not be.
Originally posted by Sarge7402
For me it was a Colt 1917 which I carried on a duty belt in a small rural community. My speed loader pouches were filled with two each full moon clips giving me a quick reload and 30 rounds at my disposal.
^This sums it up for me.If I were to carry a revolver for duty today, it'd very likely be a 627 with 8 rounds of 357 mag on tap.
Before that? I'd like a 686, all the strength of the N frames but without all the heft.
Before that? I'd take a M19
Earlier than that, I'd probably like a M1917 S&W 45acp.
Before even that, probably a Colt SAA.
What era of duty revolver we talking about here?
Although I like all three, the middle one (1911) is not a revolver.