John Matrix
Member
So I was at Dick’s sporting goods a couple of weeks back and I was surprised by how inexpensive some of their rifles are. I began tossing around the idea of adding a bolt-action .308 to my collection simply because I have always wanted one, and they are selling one with a scope for about $379. I recognize that this is on the cheap side, but I am curious as to why. What is the difference between this and a .308 that costs $1,000 more? (aside from quality of scope obviously)
I know this is very basic question, but I am honestly curious here as a bolt-action rifle is really quite simple. I understood the merits of spending a little more to get something nice when I bought my AR – that weapon has a lot more parts and precision operation, but for a bolt-action rifle, what is there really besides a tube, a simple action and some wood? Granted, I understand that the optics that come with that weapon are probably not the best, but that isn’t a big deal to me. I just want to another rifle to take the range. I don’t hunt, and don’t need to snipe communist insurgents. I am not opposed to buying a better hunting rifle later if I ever do get into hunting; and if the need to defend the country against communist insurgents ever arises, I will just grab my AR
So what exactly will be the difference between a cheap rifle like this and a very nice one? 1” at 300 yards? Mis-feeds? Nothing?
Thank you in advance for your input.
I know this is very basic question, but I am honestly curious here as a bolt-action rifle is really quite simple. I understood the merits of spending a little more to get something nice when I bought my AR – that weapon has a lot more parts and precision operation, but for a bolt-action rifle, what is there really besides a tube, a simple action and some wood? Granted, I understand that the optics that come with that weapon are probably not the best, but that isn’t a big deal to me. I just want to another rifle to take the range. I don’t hunt, and don’t need to snipe communist insurgents. I am not opposed to buying a better hunting rifle later if I ever do get into hunting; and if the need to defend the country against communist insurgents ever arises, I will just grab my AR
So what exactly will be the difference between a cheap rifle like this and a very nice one? 1” at 300 yards? Mis-feeds? Nothing?
Thank you in advance for your input.