What is the Best 4 inch 38 or 357 ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a S&W Mod 19-5 and I love it I have carried it on duty and just out for fun. I have never had probs with it, if you can get one that would be one of the best guns for you.

John
 
Korth...

Korth is the rolls-royce of DA revolvers...;)

For regular US made brands I like the Ruger SP-101 and GP-100. Top-notch! :D
 
+1 Model 19
+1 686+

and +10 on the quote
DEMOCRACY is two wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for lunch...
LIBERTY is a well armed sheep contesting the outcome of the vote...
 
Alas, Ben didn't likely say that as lunch was not a word in general usage at the time (coming from Luncheon). It is also not found in Bartlett's book of Franklin's quotes.

Yet, I have always liked the abbreviated version:

"DEMOCRACY is two wolves and one lamb voting on what to have for lunch. LIBERTY is a well armed lamb."
 
Hoptob and VanillaGorilla have an angle, as long as it's that they've never shot those guns against a 4" L frame. This gun is why I sold my best 4" 67 and 4" 28 - superb actions, but they just didn't swallow .357s and act like a man like the 586/686 does. This is the finest .357 you can find, unless you can pay for a 3.5" 27. I will provide visual tips for you:

1) 686 4" with "Texas Ranger" smooth target grips;
IMGP2818-1.jpg

2) S&W 27 3.5", the finest .357 ever made
IMGP2975-1.jpg
 
What is the Best 4 inch 38 or 357 ?
Sorry, I have no idea. But I have no complaints about my stainless GP100. It has been shot a lot, has smoothed up nicely, goes bang every time, and is plenty accurate if I do my bit.
 
sold my best 4" 67 and 4" 28 - superb actions, but they just didn't swallow .357s and act like a man like the 586/686 does
I'm not sure how you can say this about the Model 28. It is an N frame, like the 27. Not as nicely finished but just as strong. I have one of each.
 
No contest! S&W model 19/66! Older ones, without the asinine key locks, of course.
 
Colt 357 (pre Python) model is pretty remarkable and better value than the later Python model.
 
Well...

I'd have to say the 4" RM, unRM, 27, adn 28, in that order.

With the 19 and 99 trailing behind, albeit closely.
 
I can't disagree with any of the above. But if you are comfortable with the 6 inch GP-100 wouldn't the easy thing be to go to the 4 inch version? Of course if the weight of the 6 inch is the issue I don't think the 4 inch would be the solution.
 
Edited to remove response that was intended for a different post!


Good luck to you in your search and let us know how it turns out.


Cheers!
 
Last edited:
Quote:
sold my best 4" 67 and 4" 28 - superb actions, but they just didn't swallow .357s and act like the 586/686 does


I'm not sure how you can say this about the Model 28. It is an N frame, like the 27. Not as nicely finished but just as strong. I have one of each.
KyJim is offline

Jim,

Yes, I should explain why I sad that. I do like N frames - I still have a few and have three I will never, ever, ever sell (3" 629-1, 3.5" 27, and a 6.5" .455 Hand Ejector in .45 Long Colt). But the thing is the 4" 686 and the 4" 28 (or 27) weigh exactly the same to the ounce (mine each weighed 41ozs). The L is more compact, and with a much (relatively) heavier and underlugged barrel. I find that really alters the recoil characteristics between the two and in the favor of the L, despite the N's larger frame size. The barrel of the 586/686 makes it recoil more softly and get back on target quicker. Despite the nominally larger frame size on the 28, the weight is the same as the 686, and that weight is laid out to very specifically to tame recoil. Also the bore axis is slightly deeper in the hand, which helps, too. The 28 wasn't bad, but I just found the 686 more pleasant to shoot with full-power .357 loads. With .38s, it was no big difference, and the lighter barrel of the 28 made/makes it point quicker than the 586/686 - so it's always a trade off. So, for the person who prefers a 19 to, say, a 28 because it's lighter and points quicker, well, I bet they'd likely prefer then the 28 to the 586/686.

Now the thing that wasn't fair in retrospect is I have smooth targets on the L, and had the factory Magnas with a grip adapter on the 28. If I had plain targets on the 28 it might have been much closer. I have some N checkered targets, maybe I'll put them on the 27 (it is 3.5", so won't be perfectly fair) and re-do the comparison this weekend.

And, I wish I hadn't sold the 28, honestly, but now I have a 27 so unless I find one on firesale I doubt I'll replace it right away. That 28 had a MUCH nicer trigger and better b/c gap than the 27. I have NOTHING against them (except I really, really like the balance of the 3.5"). Mechanically, it was probably the absolute best made S&W I'd ever seen. Now you are making me mad because you are making me regret selling it!!!!

One of my future projects is to get a cosmetically challenged 28, cut the barrel back to just ahead of the locking lug/ejector shroud, making it like 3 1/16" effectively, then rounding the grip frame, bluing, and then putting on combat grips. Basically building the "Lew Horton" 28-3 that never got made when they did all the 3" 24-3, 624s, 29-3s, 629-1s, 657s. I always thought a 3" RB 28 would be an excellent gun. I think the .357 is the do-all chambering for a revolver, and it was silly to build those cool N frame 3" models in .44 and .41 and not do a .357. So if you ever see a cosmetically challenged but functional 28 that needs to be re-born and loved, point me to the seller!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top