Flechette
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2011
- Messages
- 481
The Russian OTS-38 revolver did that. Had the barrel on the bottom too. (The top "barrel" is a laser)
Wow! I have never seen such a thing!
Thanks JSH1!
The Russian OTS-38 revolver did that. Had the barrel on the bottom too. (The top "barrel" is a laser)
Ah, but the vast majority of folks who use a knife use a fixed blade knife.
WHAT???
I have carried a Swiss Army knife in my pocket ever since college. Don't ask when that was. Seldom is there a day that goes by when I don't take it out and use it for something
Here is a Mateba 2006M. It has the benefit of the low barrel but without the strange grip to trigger relationship of the Rhino.
Except that the only thing the barrel is "LOW" in relation to is the cylinder. The barrel is still above the grip and trigger (though it is lower than many autos).
Unfortunately the sight line and much mass is now well above the bore.
Again, chasing innovation down the receding back slope of the evolutionary curve -- leaving the balancing point of ergos and physics far behind.
Of course, but that comes at a price (... just look at that huge "rib" and cylinder balanced up on top) that very, very few shooters would be willing to pay. Nobody's trading a Model 19 or 686 or Python or even a GP100 for one of those.The barrel is also lower in relation to the grip than a traditional revolver. The greater the distance between the grip and the barrel the greater the muzzle flip.
Likewise, while professional users like military and police will probably never revert to revolvers, I think they make a ton of sense for many casual civilian shooters, for both recreational and defensive use.I believe he moved the goal posts a bit on you. I'm sure he was speaking of the professional USERS of knives such as chefs, butchers, commercial fishermen, gardeners/crop harvesters and such all of whom spend hours a day with a working knife in their hands, and it will be -- universally -- a fixed blade.
Very much a different level of "use" from the millions of us who tote around a folder everywhere and use it once or twice a day or per week.
Packaging. Figure out how to place it so it doesn't make the gun cumbersome, interfere with the cylinder opening, etc.I've wondered why revolver don't have a shield to protect the shooters fingers anyway.
More poly. Maybe higher capacity in 327 Fed Mag? How about a cylinder designed to function like a magazine? Revisiting the top-breaks?
How would a cylinder function like a magazine? Would you replace the entire cylinder to reload?
As for top-breaks; people will say that they are doomed because of the stress put on the top strap by high pressure loads. However, I think that newer alloys and better engineering could handle it. The latch does not have to be made like the latches of years' gone by. Newer designs with compound curves can be made to maximize the cross section bearing the load.
To put it another way, we have really hard kicking magnum shotguns that use break open designs. Why not revolvers?
If there was, it failed. Putting the cylinder behind the hand would make already clunky guns for carry even clunkier.Was there ever an attempt to put the cylinder behind the shooter's hand? The barrel would then pass over the hand and have more useful length. Think of a "bullpup" revolver.
Aside from the grid one aesthetics and (for most shooters) undesirable additional weight of all that metal, divorcing the sight line farther from the bore axis isn't the best thing anybody ever thought of.What is the "price" of having the rib?
I've wondered why revolver don't have a shield to protect the shooters fingers anyway.