What is the most economical Bear Round?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
11
I looked at the 50 Alaskan but at $75 for 30 lets face it...thats not a caliber I can simply use for fun and target shooting whenever I want.

So what is the most economical bear round?
 
IMHO, cartridges like the .50Alaskan demand handloading for the shooter to obtain any respectable level of proficiency.

The .45-70 is probably the most economical and luckily, one of the most effective, properly loaded. Look for hardcast loads of 420gr or more. Forget the old school jacketed loads like the old Remington 405gr. A heavy, tough bullet from a .30-06 or bigger also works well.

I don't wanna get into a deep discussion regarding them but I'd rather have virtually any decent rifle over a shotgun slug. Of any kind.
 
.22lr. Hit em in the eye.
Oh, did you want the most economical effective bear round? 12ga slugs in a short barreled shotgun.
 
Will the 30-06 stop a bear? I have read conflicting opinions on the issue.

A 30-06 loaded with heavy bullets will stop any bear as well as anything short of a 375 H&H magnum. There is no reason to look further.
 
What we old time Alaskans call Brown Bear, are what outsiders (and the hordes of carpet-baggers moving here) call Grizzly.

The idea of "physically stopping" a 800-900 pound bear which is running at 35-40 mph is impossible with a hand held firearm. (from a physics point of view. )
You can either kill them with a properly placed shot & properly constructed bullet combination,, or you can disable them by breaking a shoulder. The third option is wounding and pissing them off, that does not usually turn out so well for the rifleman.

In most villages the largest rifle you see is a 30-06. It is affordable, most folks are smaller stature, and they avoid getting into Brown Bear trouble with common sense. (you can't eat a brown bear anyway)

The closer you get to a large city or a big gun-shop, the larger the rifle calibers become.

Back when I hunted Browns, the largest bear I ever harvested was taken with a 7x57mm Mauser at 175 yards. (neck-spine shot). The worst case I had of wounding a bear which ran off and had to be tracked for two days, was when I gut-shot one with a 458 Win Mag at 40-50 yards.

This last fall I saw the remains of a 270 grain, 375-H&H Hornady factory load which fragmented after only penetrating 3 inches into a large brown bear.

I have never been charged by a bear unless I deserved it. While I no longer hunt them, I do carry a either my 350 Rem Mag, 416 Taylor or 45-70 when packing meat through Brown Bear prone areas. They read my mind and leave me alone. On the other hand my father and grandfather never owned anything larger than a 30-06 and they did just fine.
 
CarmenSanDiego said:
I looked at the 50 Alaskan but at $75 for 30 lets face it..thats not a caliber I can simply use for fun and target shooting whenever I want.

Sounds as if you are confusing a cartridge capable of taking a larger game animal and a cartridge that is cheap to use and have fun plinking with.

Apples and oranges
 
Today, 04:13 PM #16
weeniewawa
Member


Join Date: July 20, 2007
Location: Central California
Posts: 105
I wouldn't want to be thinking about how much money I was saving by not getting the best round available as the bear was eating me

+1 That is exactly what I was thinking. When it comes to bear, get something that will work and work well no matter what the price. Most bear guns are not in any sense a plinking rifle. I figure it is worth the money if it saves my life and my family. Ammo is expensive today. If you want to save money, then learn to reload. Then you get the best of both worlds, great ammo at a good cost.
 
I would love to get the best defense system money could buy, however, I cant afford to regularly practice with something which will cost me 75 dollars for just 30 rounds. How am I going to get good with the Alaskan 50 if the rounds cost that much?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top