The PG was.... fun? I don't get what the big deal is. Are people really this sensitive to recoil?
*Sigh* I am disappointed but hardly surprised. Some of you guys need counseling.
ArmedBear said:It's one thing to do that to an old Mossberg, but butchering an old Model 37 that way is not something I'd admit to in public, to say nothing of posting a picture.
A PGO shotgun is like taking your 27" wheels off you racing bike and putting 16" wheels on so that it will fit in the car easier on the way to the race. The bike might still go but you sure are going to be behind.
Some negative posters actually know what they are talking about. These posters spent time and ammo using a PGO. After which they decided for their purpose the negatives of a PGO did not outweigh the good of a full stocked gun.
I don't really see how your opinion matters at all.
The way I see it....
A PGO shotgun is like taking your 27" wheels off you racing bike and putting 16" wheels on so that it will fit in the car easier on the way to the race. The bike might still go but you sure are going to be behind.
Touchy, touchy.... lighten up, go to Walmart and buy a sense of humor.
Keep cutting your stocks, Bill. Do with your equipment what you want. It's yours. Chances are, I did the same thing a few times. I enjoy customizing, too.
We issue that style at work now. The particular maker is ATI. I have no idea why we went this route, as it really is a crappy solution (probably more related to the maker than the general design).One of these days, I may try out the M4-style sliding stock with a pistol grip on a shotgun. While I know the M4 stock won't handle the recoil as well, I think this setup might be a decent compromise of reduced OAL but control.
I note we don't see them at 3 gun matches, CAS matches, Skeet matches, Trap matches, on Sporting Clays courses, or in the hunting fields.
[sarcasm}
Of course, any of the folks advocating their use is welcome to come out to PGC range in MD and amaze and delight me with your expertise.
[/sarcasm].....
This makes no sense. The point Dave made is that, in the SHOTGUN competitions, you don't see PGO shotguns used - at all. If they offered any benefit, you better believe that the competitors would be using them. The logical inference is that they don't work better than traditionally-stocked shotguns under the types of conditions found in these competitions and in the hunting fields.You don't see crossbows, broadswords, single shot pistols, spears etc at any of those matches, either. But just because one weapon isn't suited for a particular type of use doesn't mean it's not useful at all. You don't see pistols being used for skeet for example.
Sure, you can. But, as the saying goes - the only opinion that's of interest is an informed opinion. Folks that shoot A LOT will have more interesting opinions than folks that don't. Folks that shoot to train for Serious Work will likely have more interesting opinions than folk who put a handful of shells downrange every now and again.I'll keep that in mind that unless youre military or LEO you can't draw any sort of equitable opinion on PG shotguns.
This makes no sense. The point Dave made is that, in the SHOTGUN competitions, you don't see PGO shotguns used - at all. If they offered any benefit, you better believe that the competitors would be using them. The logical inference is that they don't work better than traditionally-stocked shotguns under the types of conditions found in these competitions and in the hunting fields.