The old woman who had her home invaded in order to tackle, disarm, and remove her after Katrina (well known video hit Youtube)...I think that would qualify. Just a real world example that came to mind.
Do you have a link? I'm not familiar with the story, and your own description leaves me wondering who was doing the tackling and disarming.
I'm going to venture to say that if you were talking about the local police, the national guard or the military, that no, an armed resistance to a tyrannical state was not in order.
If you think a single entity screwing up (and I agree that if it's government authorities you're talking about, they certainly overstepped their bounds) is equal to a tyrannical state, then you and I have a totally different sense of scale.
The correct response is a legal/civil one to such an act, not a "second amendment solution."
First of all, if there's a disaster and the local authorities decide to drag you kicking and screaming out of your home, shooting at them is only going to make things worse for
you.
Which only leaves actions after the event. Are you suggesting because some authorities got out of hand, that the old woman should start counter insurgency operations against the local constabulary?
Katrina didn't wipe away the court system.
Like I said, wrong answer, you will pay.