Kynoch
member
Not really.Draft horses don't look ugly as sin. Besides, any quality 1911 works just as well as any glock.
Glocks cost they, they're more reliable and they hold more cartridges.
Not really.Draft horses don't look ugly as sin. Besides, any quality 1911 works just as well as any glock.
they need to ,,, oh and there ugly but my wife likes her ugly glock , come to think about it she likes me tooo hummmmmmNot really.
Glocks cost they, they're more reliable and they hold more cartridges.
Is that a John Garand design?
The Calico M-100 has to be one of the ugliest things ever designed to hurl bullets. Seriously, don't google a picture of is because you cannot "un-see" something this ugly.
I warned yaOkay, now since you said "don't" google a picture, naturally I had to do it. That thing is kinda hideous. All of them, actually.
I forgot all about the Dardick.....the Tround never panned out...Has to be the Dardick, although by mentioning it I'm showing my age.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKE2YwtcTXE
Isn't that the "forearm pistol" the Air Force was experimenting with 30 or 40 years ago? I think they called it a "Bushmaster" - I vaguely remember seeing it on a magazine cover back then. If its the gun I'm thinking of, it shot some sort of .22 centerfire and the magazine section could be rotated a bit to left or right so as to facilitate use by either hand. It was being touted as a potential survival gun for downed pilots.7thCavScout said:hso what is that thing?
I believe that you are dead on with the Bushmaster survival pistol.Isn't that the "forearm pistol" the Air Force was experimenting with 30 or 40 years ago? I think they called it a "Bushmaster" - I vaguely remember seeing it on a magazine cover back then. If its the gun I'm thinking of, it shot some sort of .22 centerfire and the magazine section could be rotated a bit to left or right so as to facilitate use by either hand. It was being touted as a potential survival gun for downed pilots.