Not really.
Glocks cost they, they're more reliable and they hold more cartridges./QUOTE]]
I'm not sure what you mean by glock cost they?
Glocks are very good guns but they are not more reliable than a
quality 1911. And ammo capacity isn't actually such a big deal. I mean, they hold 8 rounds. That should be enough any HD or SD situation.And 1911s do not cost that much more than a Glock.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=307541935
I have to disagree with the Glock comments. As far as polymer framed handguns go, Glock is one of the best looking ones. It has a cohesive style to it. Simple and minimalistic. There's nothing there that doesn't need to be there. The perfect opposite would be the XD series. It has all these extra serrations and engravings to try to make it look cool and it just fails at it miserably. It's like the designers though "lines and angles make for good looking guns" but with no knowledge of how lines and angles actually work, so they just stuck them randomly all over the place.
As for what I think is the ugliest guns, without just repeating what everyone else mentioned. I would have to say most modern designed sporting shotguns.
Beretta Whatever
Benelli Vinci
Remington Versa MAX
They all have this ugly Euro-Trash look to them. Really just another example of designers putting curves and lines on a gun just for the sake of it with no real purpose behind any of it.