srtolly
Member
I have a PF9 with almost 700 rounds through it without problems. Easy to conceal almost anywhere. That said about half the time I carry my Makarov in 9x18, I'm kinda weird like that.
Walther PPS
a strange person said:The only reason the PPK is on the list is that I have a fetish for steel, and for traditional double actions.
Price IS a factor; I don't want to pay for anything more than pure functionality.
The 380 has no place being compared to a 9mm, unless you reload for a locked breech model, such as the Keltec P3AT, or the little Sig or the older Star Pony, or the Colt Mustang. You left out the best of the pocket 9's, the Diamondback DB9
What's your point, exactly. Glock subbies suck? .380 sucks? I'm not drawing a conclusion between these two very differing subjects.it's had plenty of kabooms in .40, and plenty of "limpwristing' problems, too. I trust no gun out of the box, and to turn down by far the smallest, lightest, very low cost 9mm's over perhaps needing a fluff and buff indicates you aint very serious about this. The Glock is no pocket gun, never will be. No double stack mag gun is much of a pocket gun, or Keltec wouldn't have bothered to make the single stack PF-9. the pocket 9 offers up to 400 ft lbs. the typical 380, 150 ft lbs. the typical 380 jhp won't expand in flesh. neither will anything under 100 grs, fired from a 3" barreled 9mm. the CorBon 100 gr PowRBall load, tho, is a good round. 1300+ fps in 3", almost 400 ft lbs, and real expansion in flesh and blood. Much, much better than the 380, and the plastic nose helps it feed reliably, too.