Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Which Ruger No. 1?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Hammerhead6814, Sep 6, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hammerhead6814

    Hammerhead6814 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    701
    So apparently the Ruger No. 1 has accuracy that can't be beaten for it's price. I just got off the phone with a relative who's bought the .30-06 version and he wouldn't shut up about how it held five shots under an inch at 100 yards. Three times in a row.

    Thing is now I want one! I've always been more of a mil-surp guy, but if an AR-15 guy is crazy about it then there must be something to the No. 1.

    So what caliber is best for deer and for the results that occurred above? I don't want to buy the same rifle, what fun would that be?
     
  2. SHusky57

    SHusky57 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Messages:
    376
    .308 is pretty similar to .30-06. If you reload, get one of the zany calibers in .30 cal.
     
  3. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    Doubt that you want to do likewise, but I am considering a Tropical chambered in .458Lott or .416Rigby...and despite what people may say it will kill a deer...besides you said you wanted different right? :D
     
  4. C-grunt

    C-grunt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,838
    Location:
    Phoenix Az
    I would get one in 7mm mag. I had one a long time ago and sold it because I am a fool. Probably the only gun I really regret selling. It shot pretty good even though I was still learning the trade. Also with the 7mm mag you have an excellent long range round for some long range competition with your relative.
     
  5. skidooman603

    skidooman603 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    999
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    If I could just stop buying Mil-Surp guns long enough to afford a commercial rifle THIS is the one I would get in my FAVORITE cal. 6.5x55 swede
     
  6. bpl

    bpl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    927
    Location:
    PA
    A 6.5x55 swede or 7x57 mauser would be cool!
     
  7. cat_IT_guy

    cat_IT_guy Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,224
    Location:
    Metamora Illinois
    .35whelen would be cool I think in a nice single shot like a no 1. Having said that Im not sure its an option....
     
  8. Bill B.

    Bill B. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    961
    Actually I had been told the opposite that the triggers were not very good and that accuracy was suspect. I bought a Ruger No. 1 in 30-06 anyway because I have always like their looks and the way they handled. I had a friend give me a bunch of 30-06 ammo and I installed a 3.5 x 10 scope on mine and headed to the range. Bore sighted the rifle at 50 yards and got it grouping at 50 yards. Moved my target to 100 yards and my next 3 shots went into a clover leaf that could be covered with a nickel and centered in the bull! I did no more adjusting on the scope afterward! Mine has a pretty nice clean trigger pull also. My Ruger No. 1 is the Alexander Henry model that has the iron sights and IMO it is one fine rifle!
     
  9. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,450
    Location:
    TN
    I almost bought one in 375 H&H. Thought about it and decided I really didn't need another rifle I would rarely shoot and one that caused me pain. :)
     
  10. uvausmc

    uvausmc Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    143
    Location:
    Beaufort, SC
    I recently got a No.1 light sporter in .30-06. I'm not sure which version your relative has. Mine is very accurate but I wouldn't say it's accuracy can't be beaten for the price. My Weatherby Vanguard will shoot just as well if not better (MOA or smaller) and it was half what I paid for the No. 1. That aside, the No. 1 is a beautiful and simple rifle. It is light, handy, short even with a full length barrel, and very quick to shoulder and fire. I plan on breaking mine in on deer this season and I know it will be perfect for carrying arround the woods stalking whitetails. Your relative picked a great caliber so I dont think it would be a bad thing to get the same caliber but you could always go for .308, .270, or one of the quarter-bores. All would work fine on your average deer.

    RugerNo1.gif
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2009
  11. engravertom

    engravertom Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    67
    Location:
    Western NY
    Ruger #1 is VERY handy in 45-70!

    Recoil with most loads is not bad. The 375 H&H, as that version is heavier, wasn't too bad either. You know you are shooting something though!

    375 H&H, flat enought for deer hunting, hits hard enought for very big game.

    45-70 is my favorite in the #1 followed by the 30/06, in the A version, with open sights. The peep sight made by NECG works very well also.

    Take care,

    Tom
     
  12. PT1911

    PT1911 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,139
    Location:
    alabama
    I want one in 460 S&W
     
  13. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    I was at the range today, firing a variety of pistols, ak's and such, and was sighting in some saigas to do some pig hunting. a dude sits down next to me with a number 1. first off, it looked not only beautiful, but light, with a nice recoil pad on it. Secondly, he was firing a 45/70 cart , he had handloaded with 350 grainers. When he fired it, you could def tell, this rifle was king of the hill at the point in time, his made the king kong sound!!! but in watching him, recoil did not seem to bad, it did not throw him back like expected.
    then I looked downrange, at the 50 yd shoot an see targets he had up;
    I could clearly see the holes , on the target, at 50 yds!!!! Impressive. no glasses, scope, nothing, just my plain eyeballs.
    Made me want one real bad, as he continued to bang away at about a 1 inch group at 50 yds, with a 45/70. You know if you hit a deer with a hole that big, and about an ounce and a half of lead, it would have to pick it up, and throw it on the ground. I liked it very much. he said he also loaded it with 420's or 450 grainers sometimes.... what do you hunt in Texas with that?
    Must be going after Chupacabra...
     
  14. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    That's a myth...perhaps he's trying to bag a bigfoot. :D I have to say that if the No. 1 is as much fun as my 1885, then .45-70Govt. would not be a bad choice...though I would still go with .458WM because you can always load a .458 like a .45-70...and brass will last a long, long time. :)
     
  15. RonE

    RonE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    696
    Location:
    Rockport, Texas
    I have owned Ruger No1's in 22-250, 7mm Rem Mag and 30-06. They are wonderful rifles that handle very well for average sized people. They are in my opinion, a little on the heavy side.

    Are they accurate? I would have to say yes with reservations. My 22-250 was a tack driver, the 7mmRem Mag would consistently shoot 2" 100yd groups all day long which was very frustrating.....The 30-06 I had re chambered to 30-338Win Mag and it's accuracy would put the 22-250 to shame. It would shoot Ballantines about 70% of the time if I concentrated. I have since had it re chambered again to .300 Win Mag and hope it shoots half as good as it did.

    I really like the No.1 rifles and have killed lots of deer and elk with mine at ranges out to 500+ yards.

    My advice is to go out and buy a Ruger No 1 and see if you like it, if you decide that you don't feel comfortable with it, then sell it, they seem to keep their value pretty well.
     
  16. dubbleA

    dubbleA Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,410
    Location:
    Tejas del sur
    They can be quite accurate at times. I got lucky with one that's a shooter.

    z1.jpg
     
  17. jkingrph

    jkingrph Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,042
    Location:
    E. Texas
    I have #1's in 22 Hornet, 7x57, 30-06, 375H&H and 458 Win Mag.

    As to accuracy, they are not up to a good bolt gun, but more than adequate. Triggers with a little work can be excellent.

    All that said I wish I could get one in 9.3x74R, 405 Win, 450/400 and maybe a 416 Rigby. Oh yes, add a 6.5x55.
     
  18. Sc0

    Sc0 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    My vote would be for .405 Winchester or the .45-70. From their you can go smokeless and FMJ or blackpowder and cast.

    I have a stainless/laminate in .45-70. 405gr and cast bullets and 50gr of Varget is a pretty stiff load to shoulder....
     
  19. browningguy

    browningguy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    4,645
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    The 1A light sporter is by far the most elegant of the Ruger, and any caliber from .243 to 30-06 would make a fine deer rifle.
     
  20. earlthegoat2

    earlthegoat2 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,514
    Location:
    SE GA
    I have heard they have very spotty accuracy at best but......

    I absolutely love the No 1s and feel that pinpoint accuracy is the most overrated things in shooting in America today.

    Ill take my No 1 in International guise in 6.5x55 or 7x57. I would really want a 257 Roberts though and those cant be had with the full stock unless I could find the stock and put it on later.
     
  21. pangloss9

    pangloss9 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1
    I have a Ruger No1-B in 270 Win. I would buy the rifle again without hesitation. However, there are plenty of calibers that would be just as good. To me, one of the big benefits is the shortness of the action. I have a 26" barrel, but the rifle is no longer than a bolt action with a 24" barrel. The extra two inches of barrel length lend themselves well to shooting heavier bullets with slower burning powers. I like the 160gr Noslers for the 270. Without scope the rifle weight 8.25 pounds, so it's a bit heavy. Maybe I should check into a No1-A. I didn't realize they were 1.25 pounds lighter until I just checked.
     
  22. sig220mw

    sig220mw Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    610
    Location:
    Texas
    I've always loved the looks of the ruger no. 1's. But I have read over the years that their accuracy is spotty. One will be very accurate and the next not so accurate. Because of this, I have reasoned that their price is too much for me to spend on a rifle with such a track record. Too bad because like I said, I love the looks of the no. 1 and follow up shots can be made rather rapidly with practice once you have confidence in your load.
     
  23. testosterone

    testosterone Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    226
    .375 Holland and Holland.
     
  24. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    11,269
    Location:
    28078
    dubbleA, recoil must be fierce on that .416Rigby...it takes a lot to shear a scope ring off like that. :neener:
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2009
  25. dubbleA

    dubbleA Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,410
    Location:
    Tejas del sur
    The recoil is very brisk to say the least off the bench but is very managable off of sticks. I have been brushed a couple of times by the scope but the PH's have a blunt rubber covering on the eye peice and it is spring loaded so it absorbs some recoil.:D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page