Show me some in .45 LC going for that now.Oh please, I watched two NIB .44Spl's go for $1200-$1300 two months ago on Gunbroker.
Show me some in .45 LC going for that now.Oh please, I watched two NIB .44Spl's go for $1200-$1300 two months ago on Gunbroker.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=557174164Show me some in .45 LC going for that now.
The frame is not off the hook. It must survive the backthrust, as when the gun is fired, there are opposing forces within the frame pushing fore and aft. Since backthrust is directly related to pressure, frame strength is also a factor in longevity.Let's get one thing straight. With a revolver, the cylinder is the pressure vessel that must withstand the pressure of a fired cartridge, not the frame. The frame supports the cylinder, and must be able to absorb the concussion of recoil, but it is the cylinder that must survive the pressure spike.
. IMHO, only those with little more than passing interest consider chamberings other than .45Colt to be "off calibers".
Here's a 1st generation that went for $1500.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=544935865
A couple of 3rd generation .44Spl's that went for $1050 and $1300. And like it or not, the .44Spl's tend to bring a premium over other chamberings.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=548372613
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=549297993
So please, let us dispense with the notion that it's impossible to get a good Colt SAA for around $1200.
You're not really familiar at all with Colt pricing, are you?A frankengun, with a replaced cylinder and barrel.
Again. Historically, 3rd generation .44Spl's have always commanded a premium. Again, no one said what they were looking for. Am I supposed to read your mind? If you want to limit yourself to ill-shooting .45's, that's your choice but there are a lot of other choices. Always have been.For me, .44 Special and a 7.5" barrel are less desirable.
If (big IF) this holds true, it will be the first time in 3rd generation production. In reality, the conditions we're seeing now are probably only temporary. Colt is producing just as many guns as they always have. People are panicking (like they do) because of Colt's financial woes and there's a vacuum left by USFA. Once that settles down, price will follow suit.I think 3rd generation Colt SAAs will be a good investment.
I'm not obligated to find anyone a deal. I never said they were growing on trees or were easy to find. YOU said there were no Colt SAA's to be found for $1200 and I already gave you two recent examples. I'm not going to continue this back and forth because my contradictory evidence conflicts with your perception of reality.Did you find that new Colt SAA in .45 yet for $1,200? How about a new Colt SAA in ANY caliber for $1,200?
You guys can't have been paying attention to this market for very long.
You're not really familiar at all with Colt pricing, are you?
Again. Historically, 3rd generation .44Spl's have always commanded a premium. Again, no one said what they were looking for. Am I supposed to read your mind? If you want to limit yourself to ill-shooting .45's, that's your choice but there are a lot of other choices. Always have been.
If (big IF) this holds true, it will be the first time in 3rd generation production.
In reality, the conditions we're seeing now are probably only temporary. Colt is producing just as many guns as they always have. People are panicking (like they do) because of Colt's financial woes and there's a vacuum left by USFA. Once that settles down, price will follow suit.
I'm not obligated to find anyone a deal.
I never said they were growing on trees or were easy to find. YOU said there were no Colt SAA's to be found for $1200
and I already gave you two recent examples.
I'm not going to continue this back and forth because my contradictory evidence conflicts with your perception of reality.
Because it's a friggin' 1st generation!How is a gun with a replaced barrel and cylinder supposed to support your example?
Who would think the .44Spl is "obscure"??? I don't care what 'most' are into. I've never cared for what's popular. I judge based on merit, certainly not popularity. Superior? No, just open minded and not a .45 Kool Aid drinker. I just prefer a little broader horizon.I don't think most are into the more obscure calibers, if you want to feel superior for liking them, OK.
You see, in a capitalist society, there's nothing stopping another maker from stepping in and producing a high quality SAA. Just like USFA did.How is the vacuum left by USFA going out of business going to 'settle down'?
I did, several times.You are if asked to support your point.
Oh, you implied it. Just like no one stipulated barrel length or chambering, no one stipulated it had to be brand new production. Because you see, the world is full of NIB 3rd generation Colt SAA's. Just as the 7½" blued .44Spl I posted a link to was brand new in the box and unturned. Even though it was not new production, it's still "new".The context of MSRP and a several year's wait implies new, apparently you didn't get it. I never said you can't get a used one for about that, last month I bought a used Colt SAA for $1,100 + tax. Our point is the days of $1,200 new ones are over.
There's nothing wrong with my reading comprehension but my mind reading skills are a little rusty. I've been practicing on my wife but as of yet, no positive results. Now that we actually KNOW what you meant (as opposed to what was said), I agree, it is going to be very, very difficult to find a new-production, NIB 4¾" .45Colt for $1200. Happy?Again, to have a conversation some reading comprehension on your part would help.
Colt builds them the same way they always have. If you feel like paying more for it thats not their fault. I bought a new 4 3/4" SAA in 45 Colt cause I'm a sheep and a I have a whole pile of 45's and to ME a Colt isnt a Colt unless its a .45. Anyway after a hundred rounds through I had to stop shooting it because the timing had slipped to the point where I couldnt shoot it without dinging up the cylinder leads. Had to take it apart and adjust the bolt leg where it contacts the cam. On a new gun ! Colt used to put a note in the box reminding you that if you shot the gun it would make the value go down. Best warranty claim prevention aid idea ever!I would ask everyone to observe the picture Driftwood posted in post #13. Do you notice anything that should not be present on a gun of that price range??
That stamping on the barrel would look much crisper and nicer if it had been lightly polished after stamping, to get rid of that raised metal around the lettering. It only takes a minute or so and the lettering looks sooooo much better.
As much as a Colt costs, I would expect better. Nit picking? Of course it is. But when you pay that much for a gun you are allowed to pic nits....
Show me some in .45 LC going for that now.
The 2014 market and the 2016 market are not the same thing. You were coming off USFA's meltdown and Colt was just easing into their bankruptcy proceedings. The current market is much tighter. The demand is still there and Colt is still building guns but not anywhere near demand. You can certainly still buy a Ruger or a somewhat close Italian copy but if you want a new US made original style SAA you are fighting the supply and demand curve.You can find them. I know...I did.
I was in the market for just that...a 5.5" Colt SAA, color case hardened, in .45 Colt caliber for quite a while. It was to be my reward to myself for having paid off my credit card.
The LGS was searching for months to find one. I kept an eye out online. Finally spotted one in my price range on Gunbroker...checked with my LGS, bought it, had it shipped to them. $1,200 or so, if I remember correctly.
People just have to realize that some firearms require patience to not only find, but find at a reasonable price they are willing to pay.
I was just happy to get my Peacemaker in 2014, making the 200th anniversary of Samuel Colt's birth.
There is no context in which that is a true statement. Colt quality has been on a roller coaster ride for over 100yrs.Colt builds them the same way they always have.
That's the problem, people aren't picky enough. Enough folks have had this starry-eyed perception of Colt's that they were able to get by producing a lackluster product for decades.As much as a Colt costs, I would expect better. Nit picking? Of course it is. But when you pay that much for a gun you are allowed to pic nits....
Then you're paying the price for only liking what is the most popular. For me, much of the appeal of the Colt SAA and subsequently the USFA line (which had more diversity than Colt has in 100yrs), is that they were produced in a such a broad array of configurations, chamberings and barrel lengths. They are flavors of ice cream other than sugar-free vanilla.I bought a new 4 3/4" SAA in 45 Colt cause I'm a sheep and a I have a whole pile of 45's and to ME a Colt isnt a Colt unless its a .45.
Then you're paying the price for only liking what is the most popular. For me, much of the appeal of the Colt SAA and subsequently the USFA line (which had more diversity than Colt has in 100yrs), is that they were produced in a such a broad array of configurations, chamberings and barrel lengths. They are flavors of ice cream other than sugar-free vanilla.
Beat me to it, as you said 2014 is irrelevant to 2016. And unless your time isn't worth anything, spending many hours searching certainly adds to the cost.The 2014 market and the 2016 market are not the same thing. You were coming off USFA's meltdown and Colt was just easing into their bankruptcy proceedings. The current market is much tighter. The demand is still there and Colt is still building guns but not anywhere near demand. You can certainly still buy a Ruger or a somewhat close Italian copy but if you want a new US made original style SAA you are fighting the supply and demand curve.
Because it's a friggin' 1st generation!
Who would think the .44Spl is "obscure"??? I don't care what 'most' are into. I've never cared for what's popular. I judge based on merit, certainly not popularity. Superior? No, just open minded and not a .45 Kool Aid drinker. I just prefer a little broader horizon.
You see, in a capitalist society, there's nothing stopping another maker from stepping in and producing a high quality SAA. Just like USFA did.
I did, several times.
Oh, you implied it. Just like no one stipulated barrel length or chambering, no one stipulated it had to be brand new production.
Because you see, the world is full of NIB 3rd generation Colt SAA's. Just as the 7½" blued .44Spl I posted a link to was brand new in the box and unturned. Even though it was not new production, it's still "new".
There's nothing wrong with my reading comprehension but my mind reading skills are a little rusty. I've been practicing on my wife but as of yet, no positive results. Now that we actually KNOW what you meant (as opposed to what was said), I agree, it is going to be very, very difficult to find a new-production, NIB 4¾" .45Colt for $1200. Happy?
Compared to any 3rd generation SAA, it's more desirable, it's more collectible, it's a wiser investment and it's also $1500. Which is a bargain.The cylinder and barrel were not 1st generation, and anyway it is irrelevant to our discussion of new Colt SAAs.
Very poor analogy. The market is there. The vacuum is there. We know it's there. If it wasn't there, Colt wouldn't have a several year backlog. It's only a matter of time before someone decides to satisfy it. Colt or otherwise. Just as USFA ALREADY DID!Until that happens, I expect the price increases of quality SAAs to continue. It's kind of like saying if it rained in the Sahara you could grow tomatoes there.
Yes, I did. It just wasn't what you wanted to hear.No you didn't.
BS. New is new, regardless of how many people have owned it. Do you think a brand new Colt from the factory is going to sell for more than one that sat on someone's shelf for five years? No. And if you can't tell if a gun has been fired, you need to go back to school. One can tell from the pictures that the .44Spl I posted was unfired and unturned.I think that would more properly be termed LNIB, a gun direct from the factory is NIB. There is no way to verify whether a gun bought from an individual has been fired, despite lots of GB descriptions of guns that 'appear unfired', that maybe were cleaned really well. My point was you can't get new Colt SAAs from the factory for $1,200 as in past times.
You can't get a brand new production gun for $1200. But you can get a NIB 3rd generation SAA for ~$1200, if you are patient. Or less for a gently used example.My point was you can't get new Colt SAAs from the factory for $1,200 as in past times.
did ya'll not see my pics of my heritage big bore 45c pistol? heck guys why pay a huge price for something that's says colt on it as mine has the same metals used to make this pistol as well as the colt! my god guys my gun has very nice fit and finish in which is way higher and nicer than their 22 counterparts!! and craigc look I own two rossi 92's in 45 colt and this one heritage big bore 45! I love shooting 45 colt and I get super accurate shells as I reload my own so I can find the sweet spot that my guns like! I enjoy shooting the 45 colt and so I don't understand where you are getting it isn't accurate?? I find its very accurate with lead bullets plus I run ruger only loads in both rossi rifles shooting 300gr jsp with 20.8gr h110 powder and I only shoot these in the two rifles but in my heritage big bore 45c pistol, I use standard loads only and its plenty of power for me and really accurate!! so I plan on buyin one more heritage big bore in 45c pistol and I will shoot just as good if not better than all the colts combined! and my pistol only costs $389 a piece and this dosent break the bank neither, infact i'll go up against anyone who wants a shooting match against me with their high priced colts anytime...
Compared to any 3rd generation SAA, it's more desirable, it's more collectible, it's a wiser investment and it's also $1500. Which is a bargain.
Very poor analogy.
The market is there. The vacuum is there. We know it's there. If it wasn't there, Colt wouldn't have a several year backlog. It's only a matter of time before someone decides to satisfy it. Colt or otherwise. Just as USFA ALREADY DID!
Yes, I did. It just wasn't what you wanted to hear.
BS. New is new, regardless of how many people have owned it. Do you think a brand new Colt from the factory is going to sell for more than one that sat on someone's shelf for five years?
No. And if you can't tell if a gun has been fired, you need to go back to school. One can tell from the pictures that the .44Spl I posted was unfired and unturned.
You can't get a brand new production gun for $1200.
But you can get a NIB 3rd generation SAA for ~$1200, if you are patient. Or less for a gently used example.