LkWinnipesaukee
Member
Or rather, who shouldnt be able to have guns? In your opinion.
I think that the ONLY people that should be restricted from having guns are:
-anyone convicted of a violent crime (armed robbery, assualt, etc)
-anyone who has a mental issue which may affect their ability to handle a gun properly
-multiple DUI, rapists, and the like (who should be in jail anyway)
I probably missed someone, but I think you guys catch my drift. People with restraining orders against them/other stupid things should still be able to possess guns.
What about the same nation wide firearm laws? No more wondering if its legal to have your guns in xxxx.
Just throwing my random ideas out there. Your thoughts?
I think that the ONLY people that should be restricted from having guns are:
-anyone convicted of a violent crime (armed robbery, assualt, etc)
-anyone who has a mental issue which may affect their ability to handle a gun properly
-multiple DUI, rapists, and the like (who should be in jail anyway)
I probably missed someone, but I think you guys catch my drift. People with restraining orders against them/other stupid things should still be able to possess guns.
What about the same nation wide firearm laws? No more wondering if its legal to have your guns in xxxx.
Just throwing my random ideas out there. Your thoughts?