Y'all are funny! The majority of you here thinks that sexual predators should not be released from jail/prison, but the major of folks in this thread,
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthre...id+debt+society think that rights should be restored to criminals after serving time. It sounds like something of a double standard.
restored to criminals after serving time.
this is the difference. i don't think many people see sex crimes as crimes, but
deviance/insanity something like that.
honestly , i think "perv" types, molestors, shouldn't go to jail , but hospitals, and should not be released unless of until doctors feel they are safe (in addition to some term of confinement in some cases).
BUT- not much point wasting hospital space on incurable. repeat offenders, lock em up stop letting them out.
i think if it is determined person is no threat to society, they are tightly monitored, and have served hard time , they should also be released.
rape , when it is your typical man on woman attack , is more of a power crime, some of these can be rehabilitated.
i bet you anything we'll never see Tyson on trial for rape again for example.
but some are again the crazy pervs.
how to figure it out? tough one. until there is an easy answer, the fair thing is to give them hard time and a second chance.
i dont know about a third chance.
the two bigger complications are the drug war sucking up all the funding, and the fact that prison in many cases is not just confinement, it is torture.
what people are subjected to , it only makes people worse.
if i felt like molestor was gonna get locked up, have to hang out in jail forever, OK.
BUT- when i think well, molestor is gonna get beaten raped tortured daily by fellow inmates etc, im not sure this is a good thing.