Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why did glock put finger grooves on 3rd gens?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by GregGry, Nov 23, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GregGry

    GregGry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    994
    Location:
    Milwaukee, Wi
    I have been pondering this question for a while. Why exactly did glock put finger groves on the 3rd gens? Did enough people request it, or did glock decide to do it on their own? I have held every 3rd gen glock, and not one fits my hand right. My finger feels pinched between the trigger guard and the first finger grove. The 2nd gens fit my hand so much better. I would think the smart and economical thing to do would be to leave the front smooth, and let people put a slip on grip or something. After all, thats what 99% of all other pistol manufactures have done. Not to mention the gun would fit more peoples hands. An adjustable backstrap would be a good thing too.
     
  2. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,230
    Location:
    Central Texas
    I've heard that when they introduced the mini-Glocks (i.e., G26, G27) they needed to add "target grips" in order to make "points" on the BATmen's import list, so the thumb rest and finger grooves were added.

    As for adding them to the rest of the line . . . I'd guess it's the result of customer feedback or focus groups or something.
     
  3. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I don't know for sure, but I would think they would add the finger grooves to improve ergos :confused: :confused: :scrutiny:
     
  4. copper4262

    copper4262 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    ND
    do a google search on places to have the grips reduced - its not too pricey -- I plan to have Robar do my 22 and possibly a 27 in the next few months- Ive heard that they really do feel better that way - also there is a company that is making a metal frame for the glocks now as well - i believe its a drop in - i dont know much more then that about the company- if i can find the article again I will at the name on here
     
  5. GregGry

    GregGry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    994
    Location:
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Adding finger grips would improve the egros for some. However they have reduced the egros for everyone that has larger fingers. Kind of like making a gun with a huge grip, despite the fact it could be made smaller. For people with big hands its fine, but for the rest of the population that have smaller hands, they are screwed.
     
  6. iiibdsiil

    iiibdsiil Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    740
    Location:
    910 / 813 / 561
    Well, probably 50% of people complained the Glocks didn't have this, so to stop pissing them off, Glock put the finger grooves in, thus pissing off the other 50%, and changing up the complaints a bit. :neener:
     
  7. GregGry

    GregGry Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    994
    Location:
    Milwaukee, Wi
    I just thought of this... If people really want finger grooves moulded into the frame, how come almost no other manufacture is making a pistol with finger grooves?:confused:
     
  8. LexusNexus

    LexusNexus Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    73
    Believe it or not, I am pretty much okay with having the finger grooves. It's not that bad, though it does take some getting used to. If your hand fits, it works fine. Then again, the 2x4 grip on Glock isn't something ergonomic to begin with. Here's my pair of G19 2nd and 3rd Gen.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. BigG

    BigG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    7,081
    Location:
    Dixieland
    The nons work for me. The finger grooves are off the scale of my fingers, as are the grooved grips S&W put on some revolvers.

    [​IMG]
    These don't fit.
    Picture19046.jpg
    These do.
     
  10. Zach S

    Zach S Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,533
    Location:
    Western NC
    So people could sand them off and make glocks even uglier.
     
  11. Onmilo

    Onmilo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    9,773
    Location:
    Illinois`
    HankB got it mostly correct.

    The grooves and thumb rest were added to the Mini Glocks to gain import points.

    Since new moulds were required and it isn't hard to extend the mould for a larger frame and since the earlier smooth profile moulds were near the point of being worn out, Glock just started casting all the frames with the new finger groove moulds.
    The front portion of the mould containing the dustcover and upper slide rails was improved with an included light rail on all but the mini Glock frames.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page