Why do some people do this??

Status
Not open for further replies.

AK Hunter

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Messages
1,677
Location
Mid-West
Be carful & double check your brass you pick up from the range.
I just caught this before I started to prime & had to go back through to check them all.
It was on .45 auto brass, the cases on the left have had the flash hole opened up way too far. It looks to me that someone was trying to go without putting much powder in the case. Why do you think this was done.

45-flash-hole.jpg
 
I have shot a lot of wax through revolvers, but find it annoying in auto pistols. Not only does the slide need to be cycled by hand, but most of the time the rounds won't feed from the magazine, so need to be inserted into the chamber individually.

So my bet is that those are Winchester's "Super Clean" or similar, which use zinc bullets and lead-free primers, largely in an effort to make indoor shooting a bit less poisonous.
 
Those are factory. I can't remember why but I want to say its the non toxic or win-clean or whatever fancy term. I thought the same thing first time I came across and found a bunch of info on the line when I asked the Google.
Odd not "NT" stamped on them

The win-clean ammo from ww was an enclosed brass bullet.

Now everyone calls them tmj's.

FWIW:
coated bullets are a form of tmj
 
Last edited:
So you are saying it's not someone drilling out the flash holes, it's made that way??
I agree they need to be marked. I take it that they shouldn't be reloaded in the normal manner? Right?
 
Larry Gibson over on the castboolits forum did some testing with 308win if I recall correctly, in which flash holes were drilled with increasingly larger diameters and pressure tested. The result was that pressure went down slightly as the flash hole size increased.

Of course that being only a single test isn't definitive. And by the nature of pressure variations, it may well have opposite results depending on other variations.
 
Last edited:
So you are saying it's not someone drilling out the flash holes, it's made that way??
I agree they need to be marked. I take it that they shouldn't be reloaded in the normal manner? Right?

It has been said for decades that over-large flash holes increase pressure, but I have never come across any objective tests on the subject. For that matter, I have never even come across anyone who has reloaded such cases and then claimed to have experienced increase pressure.

I have, though, come across several people who have reloaded them with mid-range loads and claimed to experience nothing unusual. Perhaps they are flirting with disaster, but it seems like there would have been some evidence of it.

Regardless, I don't think I would try it during normal times. These may not qualify, though, and if I felt a real need, I think I would load them up on the lighter side and give them a go.
 
I just ran across two of these this week i planned on posting about. Both have Winchester headstamps. The two I spotted are destined for the recycling bin. Strange this came up at the same time. My flash holes look way to ragged to be factory I hope.
 
Win clean with larger flash holes were made about 2001 or so. They were very common then. I've reloaded thousands of the cases with no noticeable difference. I still have some in my 45 Auto stash. I run across one every now and then scroungin' range brass.
 
Federal has some larger holed 45 auto brass out there. Not as large as pictured albeit. I've loaded a mess of them indiscriminately, with full power loads. Course I can't tell the pressure, but my 1911 doesn't balk any.
 
Good post, never noticed this in any .45s and truth be told never checked for that detail.

I tumble with primer-in...
And on the Dillon 550B, de priming and re priming occur almost simultaneously.
Nice catch
 
So is the consensus it's a non issue in 45??? The testing in rifle made a difference on target. My continual drive for uniformity in realoads says for range pickups loosing 2 for peace of mind is ok.
 
I de-prime on the progressive. I would never see that. Of those with progressive presses, I don't think I'm in the minority, in that regard.

If I found something like that, I'd just toss it.
 
JMHO- I don't diddle with range brass
any more. I've problems a couple of times
that were a royal pain to put right, and since
my time is the most valuable thing I have,
( I have less every day, and it can't be
replaced for any amount of money)
I try not to waste what little I have left
Any crap brass I come across gets
smashed flat with a hammer to save
butt pains for me or anybody else
 
Larry Gibson over on the castboolits forum did some testing with 308win if I recall correctly, in which flash holes were drilled with increasingly larger diameters and pressure tested. The result was that pressure went down slightly as the flash hole size increased.

Of course that being only a single test isn't definitive. And by the nature of pressure variations, it may well have opposite results depending on other variations.

The other reason to drill the holes larger in the 308w's was if you're using an extremely light load it doesn't lock the action of a bolt action rifle up.
 
Winchester made them for certain loads, I'm not sure why. I have loaded them without issues, but i never felt good about it.
 
Those are factory. I can't remember why but I want to say its the non toxic or win-clean or whatever fancy term.

I don't know that I've ever seen factory brass punched out like that, and that includes SP .45ACP brass and the NT brass. I don't usually say 'never' anymore, and particularly with .45ACP brass, which manufacturers seem to be trying to bugger up for some reason. .45ACP used to be one of the easiest rounds to load for, and now you have to put every case under a microscope to make sure it's right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top