Why Do You Own Guns?

Status
Not open for further replies.
deano; I appreciate your passion. Definitely never lose that. But what is SUPPOSE to be and what IS are usually 2 different things. MOST people don't understand the constitution, the declaration, the rights in the constitution, etc... They don't understand economics, how a company or country exists economically, or debt. (That's why so many have so much debt on their credit cards). They don't understand politics, international affairs, etc... Believe it or not, most people don't even know how a law is made and put on the books. They don't understand our branches of government. Those who do understand some or all of these things, tend to think that everyone does. Just like so many naive people give opinions of foreign affairs with countries such as those in the middle east, terrorism, North Korea, etc... with the belief that the individuals who live in those countries think the same, believe the same, rationalize the same, have the same problems and concerns, etc... as we do. Many people in our country are just too ignorant and naive.

And that's what my whole point is about. Education! A person who is willing to let the 2nd amendment die and have all guns confiscated and outlawed has no concept or understanding that the same actions that are taken and legally voted on and adopted to remove all the guns, are the same exact methods that can be used to take away their right to free speech. But see, they don't understand that. That's why you educate them. But you're never going to conduct a dialog and persuasive argument with someone if you come across with the "BECAUSE I SAID SO" attitude. We didn't like it when our parents said it to us; and our PEERS won't respond well either if we use it on them. We can yell all we want that WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO CARRY A GUN. And guess what; the PEOPLE have the right; via their representatives; to AMEND the constitution. They can LEGALLY change that right. It's not like every amendment was written in the late 1700's. We've got quite a few of the amendments that were put in in the 1900's. Even during Clinton's time. You pee off enough people, and they can easily vote and have their representatives CHANGE the constitution. The people have that right.

But there's no conspiracy going on in the country as far as the average person goes. Those who may ask about your guns in general, may simply be curious. A friend of mine taught 19th-20th century history in college. He was the example of a far left liberal teaching college and not knowing the real world. It was all "Can't we all just get along" mentality. We were discussing pre-WWI military and government construction. He's pretty Anti-Military. I took him to a couple of really cool museums here in Wyoming where there's a lot of military history. After seeing the museums, he had a slightly different perspective on the military. He became a lot more interested in it. I went out and helped him get a couple of old military rifles in the 1903 style. I also got him a black powder simulated from the 1800's. He really appreciated the history and mounted them proudly. Then I asked him the ultimate question...... "When are you going to go and SHOOT THEM?" He said he probably wouldn't that he liked them for display purposes. I told him that I had a lot of military weapons. I mentioned that I thought if he fired some of them, he might better understand and appreciate what some of the soldiers had to go through. So I took him out shooting black powder; russian naggent, a friend's M1 Garand, 1911A1, Cap&Ball pistol, AK-47 style and AR-15 style, and a few others. The weight of some like the garand; carrying the ammo out to the woods; and similar got him thinking. After shooting for a few hours, he had a totally different respect for the weapons. He still isn't a gun owner/shooter; but he understand WHY I have guns; including for self defense. He now somewhat respects me having them. He isn't so afraid of the though of people having guns. And we talk a lot of philosophy about the constitution. I think he understands that the constitution is finely woven. If one right is challenged and taken away, all rights run the risk. I believe that even if he doesn't buy a gun for himself, he would stand up and support 2nd amendment rights. That is a win in our column and in my book.

Anyway, just wanted to point out that not everyone is as knowledgeable of the constitution, the declaration, our government, our rights, and how something that doesn't affect them at all (Such as guns) needs to be explained to them and not simply shoved at them. That will simply just have them shove back. And until our gun ownership numbers go from 80 million (Current) to about 200 Million; the Non-Gun owners have a much larger majority in this country. If they banded together, they could easily force their representatives and senators to write amendments to change, reduce, or even abolish the 2nd amendment. Remember; when the constitution was written, our founding fathers didn't even recognize blacks and women as being anything more than property. The fact that the constitution has been amended to correct that, easily shows that the constitution can be interpreted as being subject to time. And therefor can at times be amended to change or abolish certain aspects that may not be considered applicable to this time. We can't let this happen. We can't just stand up for our rights (WE SHOULD); but we also have to educate others that ALL RIGHTS are tied together; plus get more and more none gun owners interested in guns. Even if it's for hunting, sports, or protection.
 
1) Protection
2) Work related tool (REQUIRED)
3) Recreational FUN
4) FUN
5) FUN
6) Did I mention that I own guns for fun?

On a side note: I like numbering things ;)
 
Isher said:
I would like to present a new and important thread,

To wit,

"Why do I own a Skilsaw?"

Now, there are many subthreads to this thread, i.e.

How may blades do you own of what point and pitch,

Lubricants,

Spare parts,

Tips for making the Skilsaw cut where you want it to.

Practising with the Skilsaw.

Skilsaws you love,

"What's your "carry " Skilsaw.

How did you customize your Skilsaw?

Skilsaw sucks, you gotta go with Porter Cable... :cool:
 
Why do I own guns?

I bought my first when I married a beautiful woman - didn't have anything I thought worth protecting until then.
 
Re: Christcorp's reply

>>> Remember; when the constitution was written, our founding fathers didn't even recognize blacks and women as being anything more than property. The fact that the constitution has been amended to correct that, easily shows that the constitution can be interpreted as being subject to time. And therefor can at times be amended to change or abolish certain aspects that may not be considered applicable to this time. We can't let this happen. We can't just stand up for our rights (WE SHOULD); but we also have to educate others that ALL RIGHTS are tied together; plus get more and more none gun owners interested in guns. Even if it's for hunting, sports, or protection.

I believe that the Bill of Rights is a list of permanent guarantees that were required before the states would ratify the Constitution. I think of it as a binding contract. Voiding the 2nd Amendment would void that contract and the United States would cease to exist as a legitimate national government.

It's true, as you point out, that decades of miseducation have taken their toll and few today understand why the government respects any limitations at all and what is at stake when that is tampered with.

Trying to correct the wrong impressions people have is great. Creating new converts to the fold is even better. I applaud you for it and I do it myself when the occasion presents itself.

But, I believe the only arguments that will ultimately win are those based on demanding our civil rights, just as other Americans do every day.
 
I love the answer " because I can" to such threads... you dont own anything because you can or because a piece of paper says you can.. you own it because it fills a need or you simpy wanted it.. You CAN own 14 houses and a mcleran F1 as well but if it doesnt serve a need or you dont want it (or cannot afford it) then guess what... you wont.

Because I can is not a legitimate answer to any question that has ever been asked.
 
Because armed citizens are the last and BEST hope for the continued resistance of tyranny.
 
I believe that the Bill of Rights is a list of permanent guarantees that were required before the states would ratify the Constitution. I think of it as a binding contract. Voiding the 2nd Amendment would void that contract and the United States would cease to exist as a legitimate national government.

Deano; sorry, but this is wrong. I understand what you're saying; being the Bill of Rights (The first 10 amendments to the constitution), just by being Amendments, proves that the Constitution itself can/could/was/will be changed. You can believe that it's a contract, but what makes it binding? Our economy was once based on the gold standard. We had to have something tangible to back up our debt. Now, it's the so called "Good Faith" of the United States. There were later Amendments that were ratified; such as the 18th dealing with prohibition. Yet later on, it was repealed 14 years later. You can believe that the first 10 amendments are sacred and will never change, but that isn't true. If the PEOPLE petition their representatives; and they overwhelmingly present a bill to change/repeal/etc... the 2nd Amendment; for whatever cause the PEOPLE have pressed for; then it could very well become law and the courts could very well uphold it as "Being Constitutional". The constitution wasn't just decided by men and they told the rest of the people; "Hope you like it. You're stuck with it". The took the pulse of the citizenry and decided on a constitution that was in line with the freedoms that the people wanted. And over time, additional things that they hadn't thought of at the time were added. It's quite feasible for enough anti-gun citizens to petition their representatives to tell them what THEY believe the 2nd amendment SHOULD mean in today's society. And trust me, it can change if they press for it.

The ONLY way to protect the constitution, the Bill of rights within it, and the additional amendments; is to educate the people. Make the citizens realize certain things:

1. Any problems that THE CITIZENS have with the government is their OWN FAULT. They have the ultimate power. They can throw out and elect who the majority votes on.

2. This is the ONLY form of democracy that we have. After voting in a representative, our government becomes a Representative Republic. These few decide for the good of all.

3. The government WORKS FOR US; not the other way around

4. Allowing ANY rights to be taken away or curbed; even if it doesn't apply directly to you; opens the door for other rights to be changed. Including the ones that do affect them.

This is how we strengthen our country and our rights. We don't shove our rights in the face of others who don't "USE" or "CARE" for those particular rights. As someone who spent 21 years in the military; the hardest thing I ever had to do was to remind myself that part of my job was to defend the constitution and the rights of the people; especially the right to "FREE SPEECH", even though people were using that right to "Free Speech" to curse me out and tell me I was killing innocent people and destroying the world. Well the same goes for the 2nd amendment. You don't throw it in their faces and say ignorant things like; "Because it's my right"; or "Because I'm allowed to". The average American has no idea what that means. You tell them the "Tangible" reasons you have a gun. Defense, sport, hunting, skill, fun, etc... Then you expound on how it was also designed as a right to protect us from the government. And that this right was there to help protect us from losing all OTHER RIGHTS. And you talk to one person at a time. Any other method is counter productive. Just like KILLING people and BURNING an abortion clinic looks bad on the Pro-Life supporters; "Playing Soldier" in ALL it's forms; and taking separatist positions on guns and gun rights looks bad and sets a bad example for constitutionalists and those trying to preserve our rights.
 
1. Any problems that THE CITIZENS have with the government is their OWN FAULT. They have the ultimate power. They can throw out and elect who the majority votes on

Yes I agree to a point; however it seems to be vogue these days to not listen to the public. Border Security, Bailouts, so on and so on. The MAJORITY of the people have been against it, have locked up congressional and executive phone boards voicing their opinion and at the end of the day it is done anyway.

VOTE AGAINST THE INCUMBENT.
 
Re: Christcorp on the Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights aren't just Amendments to the Constitution. They were proposed before the Constitution was itself ratified because there was much resistance to creating a Federal government that wasn't limited specifically, and I would say permanently, in the specific areas addressed in the Bill of Rights.

For the Federal government to cast that aside without doing it through a full Constitutional Convention would defy the clear intent of the states in granting those limited powers to a Federal government. I would hold that doing so would invalidate the Federal government's very founding and make any such action illegitimate.

Americans don't get the right to free speech from convincing a majority of voters every election year that they should have it, they get it because it is their civil right as Americans as defined in the Bill of Rights.

I'm saying this is no less true of the 2nd Amendment than the first and that educating people about gun ownership has to include educating them that this is a most basic right.

What makes the contract by which the United States was founded binding? The refusal of the states and the people to allow it to be anything else.
 
deano; I'm quite aware of how and why the bill of rights came to pass. I understand how the main purpose of these first 10 amendments was to get the constitution itself ratified. Many people had problems with constitution as it stood. But that is not what we are debating. At least it's not what I'm debating. You are under the impression that for some reason, the bill of rights (The first 10 amendments in the constitution) can not ever be changed or repealed. I'm saying that it can. Yes, the amendment process is set up purposely to be a very difficult process. More so now than back then being we now have 50 states that would need to be involved. But there is a process in place for amendments to be proposed and passed; as well as for amendments to be repealed and/or changed. If you are so sure that the bill of rights is a legally binding contract that can not be changed, then I don't know why we have so many discussions with anti-gun followers? It would simply be accepted as the law whether people liked it or not. But that isn't the case. The truth is, there are a lot of people out there trying to get rid of the 2nd amendment. There are a lot of people trying to add amendments that can be worded differently that allows for personal "Bearing" of arms; but in a manner that allows the states and the government to put as many restrictions as the want. That is how many states get away with such stringent permit requirements. To the point where you basically can't have a gun. Places like the USSNewJersey, California, and New York. So, you may translate the bill of rights as a contract. And a very CLEAR contract. However; if that was true; there wouldn't be 50 states with very different laws concerning to keeping and use of firearms.
 
Re: Christcorp on Amendments

>>> So, you may translate the bill of rights as a contract. And a very CLEAR contract. However; if that was true; there wouldn't be 50 states with very different laws concerning to keeping and use of firearms.

Actually there would. Until more recent times it was well understood that the Bill of Rights limited Federal power alone. States like mine separately enshrined the right to keep and bear arms in their state constitutions in order to guarantee those rights against infringement by local or state laws. States which did not constitutionally protect those rights saw them eroded over time at the local and state levels as a result.

Now we have the worst of both worlds. The Feds now claim that their rules apply everywhere and override state laws, while they have not pushed the 2nd Amendment against states which infringe it.

It has to be one way or the other, not both.
 
llanite - "I bought my first [firearm] when I married a beautiful woman - didn't have anything I thought worth protecting until then."


How odd you didn't consider your life (and health) worth protecting.

Years ago, I too, married a beautiful woman whom I love and have protected.

But long, long before marrying her, I owned firearms for self defense because MY life and health were well worth protecting.

L.W.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top