Do you honestly think that any group dedicated to a cause has every interested person as a member? Or even a majority? I don't belong to MADD but I'm pretty opposed to drunk driving. Should MADD be stopped because not every driver on the road belongs to the group not even every driver who doesn't want others driving drunk belongs. That's part of your post is just absurd.
You also seem to be off base with stating the NRA needs to do more to attract Democrats. They look at politicians and evaluate them based on their positions and voting. There have been Democrats with A+ ratings. Others not so much. The reality is their are enumerated planks in the Democrats platform that are absurdly anti RKBA. We say with Machin how much we can trust some of those folks who are supposedly pro gun. The credible threat of organized opposition is the only thing that keeps some of those folks "pro 2nd amendment" same is true for many people with an R next to their name.
I'd respond to the rest but I realize I've already invested too much effort in responding to what we can only hope is trolling.
You also seem to be off base with stating the NRA needs to do more to attract Democrats. They look at politicians and evaluate them based on their positions and voting. There have been Democrats with A+ ratings. Others not so much. The reality is their are enumerated planks in the Democrats platform that are absurdly anti RKBA. We say with Machin how much we can trust some of those folks who are supposedly pro gun. The credible threat of organized opposition is the only thing that keeps some of those folks "pro 2nd amendment" same is true for many people with an R next to their name.
I'd respond to the rest but I realize I've already invested too much effort in responding to what we can only hope is trolling.
