Will a Bushnell Banner 3-9x40 stand up to the kick of .300 win mag?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
592
Location
Lake Wylie, South Carolina
or will it start to wander after a just a handful of rounds? reason for asking is i need a new scope for my deer rifle cause the one on there is a cheap pos, and i don't have alot of money at the moment, $100 is about the max i can do for a scope right now.
 
Buy a used Leupold 4x or 2x7 and use it while you save up money for the quality scope you really want. You can either cry once over the price of a good optic or cry every time a cheap one fails
 
I had a sportview 4X which would not stand up to my Feather Weight '06. I got a Leupold 2x7 which turned the little Winny into a tack driver. Agree with mistWolf 100%.
 
I was running a bushnell trophy on a .308.. 2.7-4x.. did fine. They are usually 60-110 at natchezss.com. Better glass than the sportview as well. Now I know a 10lb .308 aint the same as a 300wm in recoil.. but they claim they are tested up to that level of recoil.
 
Cheap scopes can and will fail on a .22LR. Recoil is not the only factor to consider when buying a scope. In short, don't chance it. If you only have a hundred bucks, you don't have a hundred bucks to waste. Save it and buy something better.
 
I happen to have Leupolds and like Bushnells as well. I had a Banner on a slug gun, one 7mm and one 12 gauge shooting 3.5 Turkey loads. Never had a blink. Im a believer-
 
Natchezss has a Burris FFe1 for $149 + shipping. Burris has a $50 rebate on the e1.
 
well, gun season is next month, i might just have to go with the busnell, cause total i have maybe $180 to my name and currently have major source of income cause it seems nowhere around where i live cares to hire me at the moment, and i still need to buy a s.c. hunting liscence, a camo coat and some other things... saving for a better scope just isn't an option, trust me, i'd like a fancy smancy leupold or whatever...
 
I have the scope you are talking about and it works just fine for me, I think it is very well made for its price, but I'm not sure how it would do on a 300 win mag, but it does fine on a 308 and a 30 06. I have to say I would spend the extra money for a leupold rifleman or a used 2x7.
 
I've had 2 of then break, one on a .30-06 and one on a .223 Min14. The .30-06 was a lightweight and the Mini is notoriously hard on scopes, but I would try for something a bit better. Natchez always has lots of factory refurbs at pretty good prices.
 
Leupold and forget it!

I guess you won't know until it breaks.
I hope, for your sake, you aren't on some big hunt somewhere when it does break!

That's why I buy Leupold. I don't have to wonder all the "if and when" things 'might' happen to the scope. I don't even think about it, it is the last thing on my mind and the last thing I want on my mind when ready to hunt!

Rather than wonder, I would just use one of my guns that has iron sights and be glad with it.
 
Has nothing to do with being "fancy" and everything to do with equipment that will work when you most need it to. Unfortunately, this seems to be a lesson most are determined to learn the hard way.
 
I declare, I don't understand some shooters obsession with paying as little as possible for guns & gear that they'd buy cheap junk. Not just once, but over and over. One $100 scope isn't any better than another.

The Leupold 4x, 2x7 and 3x9 are not fancy schmancy scopes. All three are about as plain as you can get, are good, solid optics for the money and will last a lifetime. I have a Leupold that is close to 25 years old and is on a hard kicking rifle I've put many rounds through. The $300 or $400 I paid for the Leupold Variable on my hunting rifle was far cheaper than the cost of paying for the conga line of cheap Tascos, Bushnells, Simmons or other cheap scope trying to find one that works.That's not to mention the cost of ammo to sight in every time a new scope is installed or shifts point of impact after each time the rifle is bumped. My Leupold is durable, repeatable, has clear optics, full field of view, good eye relief and doesn't give one a headache from trying to look through it.

For many decades, I helped many shooting buddies struggle with cheap optics as they tried one scope after another trying to find something that worked. Some were card carrying members of the "Scope Of The Month" club. I have had only a couple of Leupolds because they work and have never needed replacing.

I would forego the new camo jacket, wear my old, comfortable coat and use the money saved to buy a good, used optic, preferably a plain jane Leupold
 
I had a cheap sportview on a 7 mag that held up just fine. I can't say the same for a cheap Simmons. That gun now has good glass on it, though, a Weatherby Supreme I bought as they were being discontinued, 3x9x44. WOW, that scope is clear and bright!

A Bushnell Trophy came on a .22 mag I traded for. Very clear optics for a cheap scope. I'm impressed with that one. I've found Bushnell to be mechanically tough and reliable, though their lower end stuff lacks a bit in clarity for the optics. That Trophy is amazingly clear, but might just be THAT scope, don't know, but it's no Leupold VX3 or anything. Still, it works.
 
"I would forego the new camo jacket, wear my old, comfortable coat and use the money saved to buy a good, used optic, preferably a plain jane Leupold "

My old coat is falling apart, i need a new one unless i wanna freeze... and about how much is a used Leupold is good condition?

and lemme ask you this, would a Nikon ProStaff be good for my needs, it'd cost me every penny i have just about, but i don't figure you can go wrong with Nikon...
 
Last edited:
IMHO, and opinions vary, there are far better scopes FOR THE MONEY than Leupold. The VX1 and 2 are very ordinary and the optics ain't that great. If you're going to spend the money on a VX3 or better, look to Zeiss or perhaps Swarovski. You'll get better optics even if they're expensive.

I just think you pay more for the name with Leupold. My Weaver KV 2x10 impresses me more than a VX1 and it was only around 200 bucks. It's a tough scope. That Weatherby Supreme I bought compares well with the European stuff. It's pretty amazing. I don't know what they sold for MSRP, but I got it at sell out from a wholesaler for $150. One thing I don't care for about it, steel tube is pretty heavy.
 
I purchased a used Ruger M77 in .338 Winchester magnum back in the early 80s. It already had a Bushnell Trophy 3-9x40 mounted so I figured I'd keep that scope on there until it self destructed. It's been almost 30 years now and I'm still waiting. I don't use the rifle as much as I used to, but it still holds zero just fine and the optics are acceptable as long as you don't expect Zeiss or Leupold brightness and clarity..

Keep in mind that this old scope was made in Japan, not China and that probably has a lot to do with it's longevity.

I'm going to agree with the "buy once, cry once" philosophy put forth by earlier posters. While I own several Leupolds, unless you get up into at least the VX-3 class, I think you're mostly just paying for the name. My suggestion would be to save your pennies and buy a Zeiss. Midway has the Zeiss MC Conquest Rifle Scope in 3-9x 40mm with the Z-Plex Reticle on sale for $399.99. I know that sounds like a lot, but the first time you look through it at dusk, you'll understand, chances are, so will your grandchildren some day.

If you absolutely must get something soon and you don't have much to spend, take a look at the Mueller scopes. Mizzou Mule Guns up in Alaska has good prices, fast, free shipping and most models include a free sunshade. Buying online also means no taxes.

www.mizzoumuleguns.com/
 
MCgunner, note that I suggest a used Leupold.

Swampy, Zeiss and the other German optics companies do make a good scope. That Conquest sounds like a real good deal and if I needed a new hunting scope, I'd look into it

Dork, as to how much they cost, I'm not certain. You will have to shop around the local pawn shops and gun shops and see what they've got. If you come across an old US made steel tubed Weaver in good shape, grab it. They are getting harder to find though
 
The Bushnell Banner scope is what Weatherby installs on their Vanguard MOA combos from the factory. Mine was in .300 wby mag and did fine. It is still working great for the guy who bought it from me.
 
well, gun season is next month, i might just have to go with the busnell, cause total i have maybe $180 to my name and currently have major source of income cause it seems nowhere around where i live cares to hire me at the moment, and i still need to buy a s.c. hunting liscence, a camo coat and some other things... saving for a better scope just isn't an option, trust me, i'd like a fancy smancy leupold or whatever...
Check out Russian surplus. http://www.sovietmilitarystuff.com. They have excellent forest camo that's also exceedingly comfortable.

You could check out Nikon for scopes. I haven't heard a single bad thing about them.
 
or will it start to wander after a just a handful of rounds? reason for asking is i need a new scope for my deer rifle cause the one on there is a cheap pos, and i don't have alot of money at the moment, $100 is about the max i can do for a scope right now.
It will work great. They are fine, reliable optics.

I use Burris. Have used the Bushnells, and they're solid.
 
Last edited:
I'd also suggest a used Leupold, or a Weaver, Burris or Redfield for that matter. Anything in a used major brand scope and made in the US will be better than anything new and made in China.

Funny how some say with Leupold you're paying for a name but not with Zeiss, Schmidt & Bender or Swarovski??? :confused:
 
If you get a Bushnell and it is defective you can send it back the factory. Cost is $10 bucks. Having a mid priced to high end scope is no guarantee it will not fail. Don't get me wrong the nicer scope are nicer. But if you can't afford better the Banner will do just fine. I have a few Bushnells now and they are a decent scope. Some are used & work.
 
It is easy to say, just save up $200 more dollars and get a better scope. I grew up poor in Mississippi in the 1970s, better was often beyond what was possible. It was baloney sandwiches and thermos full of coffee cause there was no money for Micky Dees and a coke.

So how about answer this question...

What is the best scope can I buy for about $100.00 that will hold to a 300 Winchester...

Trying to get a good enough scope for $100 dollars is difficult. If you are able to spend between $125-$150 there are a few options. Understand that glass quality at this price is what it is.

A fix 4 or 6 power would be your best. With fewer moving parts a fix scope power is likely to be sturdier than a variable power scope.

A four power scope is enough magnification for most Deer or Elk hunting. If you hunt in a more open area then a 6 power would be better.

Another option might be a 2x7 scope by Redfield. They are made by Leupold and a very good warranty.

Fix four powers

Konus for $65 at midway
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/772863/konus-pro-rifle-scope-4x-32mm-adjustable-objective-30-30-reticle-matte



Weaver K-4 $130 at natchez

http://www.natchezss.com/product.cfm?contentID=productDetail&prodID=WE849415

6 power

Weaver K6 $138 At Natches
http://www.natchezss.com/Category.cfm?contentID=productDetail&brand=WE&prodID=WE849418&prodTitle=Weaver Classic K-6 6X38 Riflescope Du

2X7 variable

redfield 2X7 $140
http://www.natchezss.com/brand.cfm?contentID=productDetail&brand=RA&prodID=RA115204&prodTitle=2-7X34mm%20REVENGE%204-Plex%20Matte


Good luck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top