Wolf Attack (Pics not Suitable for Some)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I met a young englishman who talked to me a lot about fox hunting. He had been to Africa with a bow and had a lot of hunting experience... he prefers 'fox hunting' with coyotes here in the states because... you RARELY catch the coyote. It's like a big steeplechase through unknown terrain.

Reminded me a lot about a quote I once heard. "The catching wasn't so good but the fishing was excellent."

I've been on a raccoon hunt or two and I understand the thrill of treeing a big one.. heck most 'coon hunters I know don't even kill the critters anymore.

I still don't understand going into territory with known dangers without a firearm.
 
He should go back and keep hunting

I feel bad for the guy. It must have sucked! He kept saying that he will never be able to hunt with dogs again. Why, so he wouldn't thave to see that happen again? Well if you have wolfs then get this dog.! Kangal.
 
Last edited:
The old fox hunters I grew up around,didn't want to catch the fox,they just wanted the dogs to chase it.The race was what it was all about.I don't go out to eat without packing,I'll sure have something if theres a critter around big enough to eat me.I don,t know much about wolves except what I've read.I understand they are protected by law,so it's almost impossible to kill one legally.......I know what I would do.
 
"The export of pure Kangal Dogs from Turkey has been controlled and now is virtually forbidden."

Good Point, However there are many legal ways. For example getting in contact with the natural resources departmnet and get the ok... They do run a lot of checks on you like, personal referances and things that would proof that you would be owning that dog for only yourself and not sell or cross breed...
If you own a pet shop they would not give the OK see?
 
Instead of a Kangal, get Irish Wolfhounds. Haven't been wolves in Ireland for centuries because of them.:D

met a fella who used retired greyhounds to control the jack rabbits on his west texas ranch. Technique was to drive around with dogs in back of pickup till one flushed, hit brakes and chase was on... Laughed when I asked if my dog could try it. After first time, Mona ALWAYS beat greyhounds to the rabbit, of course she didn't wait for the truck to stop :D I guess he didn't know wolfhounds were used to run deer.:evil:
 
Reintroduction of wolves= Government sponsored terrorism. Put a Canadian wolf into Southern territory where the game is smaller and its a no contest.

I dare say that if that happened in the South, wolves would meet the same fate as many coyotes. Coyotes that were not wanted, nor needed with the problems they bring, but were dumped on us by the Feds anyway.
I have no problem with hunting with hounds. My Grandfater fox hunted , and had atleast 12 fox hounds.
I have never bear hunted with hounds , but did coon hunt when I was younger.
Those who have never heard a Black and Tan baying while on trail, have missed something great in life.
Monday Moring Quarterback thought.
I do not understand why the gentlemen in the story were not armed to begin with.. Even when just walking over my land(70 acres) I always carry a revolver.
 
Don't people ever get tired of bashing California?

No.

Humans are wild animals, too.

No, they're not. Look up what "civilization" means, and how being "civilized" seperates us from wild animals. Perhaps you're not used to the concept of civilization there in California, but the rest of us know well the difference between wild beat and civil human.

H&Hhunter
Senior Member



Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 1,212
As far as the wolf thing goes. The affected wolf depository states are not wanting to "wipe out" the wolf populations. They are merely demanding a way to deal with managing the populations and to handle a depredating wolf without becoming criminals. Oh and by the way you can not legally shoot a wolf that is killing your dog by law in the reintroduction states to do so is a Federal Felony. What do you think about this reintroduction program and it's more than slightly oppresive rules now?

Ok from our previous post we have learned a tiny little bit about hunting with dogs maybe we can learn a tiny little bit more. Bear with me if you will, I am passionate about this subject and have been a bear and cat guide who used hounds in the past. I do not consider myself a "houndsmen" as that is far too complimentary of title for me to claim.

The pursuit only season is exclusively for the training of bear dogs PERIOD. Whether you think it's stupid or not to be able to carry firearms legally is besides the point. You see in many states if you are carrying a firearm during pursuit season the DG&F considers that to be hunting not pursuing. If you don't hunt with hounds I guess it's impossible for you to understand the need to train new dogs every season to keep up with attrition and figure out which dogs are going to make the cut and which ones aren't.

While I can tell you that for obvious and before mentioned reasons I always carry a firearm in the wilderness. A good houndsmen with a seasoned pack of hounds seldom finds a need for a firearm unless he's actually going to kill the bear or cat he's pursuing. Here's why.

I'd dare say that there isn't a black bear on the planet that can work through three good bear dogs. I've seen a good pack put an aggressive big old male blackie up a tree 4 times in a row. The way a good hound pack works a bear is by hitting him from multiple angles at the same time with incredible speed and never latching on. They just dive in and out like a pack featherweight boxers nipping the bear, when the bear turns to get a dog another one hits him from a different angle keeping him spinning and turning totally confusing the bruin. Pretty soon all ole blackie wants to do is either exit the country or get up a tree. Of course the dogs job is to stay with the bear until he's had enough and trees up for good. It takes one hell of a special and brave dog to do this job. I'd put up three good dogs against a green horn with a .44 any day of the week for effective bear defense no two ways about it. A good dog is mans best friend under the most challenging circumstances.

Here are some hound hunting terms you should know.

When the dogs are milling around looking for a hot scent it's called "casting"
When they hit a scent it's called "Striking".
The time between the strike and sighting the animal is called the "race". The race is run by dogs who are either "hot trailing", that is on a straight line hell bent for leather on a hot scent or "cold trailing" where the dogs lose and reacquire the trail or they may be "sight trailing" where the dogs are visually chasing the critter. A good hounds men knows by the sound of the bark the dog is making what mode his dogs are in.
The dogs will race until they tree up or loose the scent or tire out. The race can go on for many hours and multiple miles across some of the toughest terrain on the planet. This is where we separate the men from the boys, most people are completely incapable of following the race from a strike to a tree. Hound hunting is the most physically demanding hunting that a person can do, bar none. I’ve had grand slam sheep hunters tell me they didn’t work half as hard for their sheep that they did for their properly hunted hound chased bear. Especially when the critter being chased goes "jackrabbit" that’s a bear or a cat that won't tree up or won't stay treed up. If you ever start hunting bear with hounds you must be prepared to walk and ride further into the wilds than you ever have before and you must also be prepared to siwash with minimal equipment on a regular basis because hounds will take you places you never dreamed of going or never wanted to go and once they start there is no stopping them. You go where they go until they end it some times spending cold nights in rugged country with only the gear you have on.

A good proven dry land cat or bear dog can be worth over $10,000 USD a good dog man is becoming a rare breed and they are some of the last true mountain men left in Americas. They are a rugged tough breed of individuals they become deeply attatched to their dogs and their horses or mules as their very life depends on them at times. Most of the ones I know carry some kind of revolver in their packs or in their trucks or on a saddle at all times. But most don't feel they need to carry one for bear protection when they have between 4 and 8 good hounds with them. Apparently in wolf country that just ain't so.

It absolutely SICKENS me to see a bunch of citified wana be "hunters" rail against houndsmen. The VAST majority of these arm chair, outdoor network watching, Real Tree wearing, once a year deer hunting fools have no knowledge of the tradition or the time and effort that goes into hunting with hounds not to mention the extreme physical stamina required and the vast amount of outdoor knowledge it takes to be a successful hounds men. The hunting houndsmen is one of the last true vestiges of our outdoor heritage they are link to our not so distant past, the last of a breed of truly in tune rugged outdoorsmen and what every hunter dreams he could be at some time in his life. And the average fat assed lazy boy "hunter" is doing his level headed best with his miss notions and misunderstandings of this great sport to destroy this truly American and extremely rugged way of life.

THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE SHOULD BE ASHAMED !!!

Because wether you know it or not your seemingly innocent way of hunting will be the next one on the chopping block.

PS

Doublenaughtspy

I asked you a question and would appreciate it if you would be man enough to answer it in public. Are you or are you not an anti hunter?

Nice! I'm glad to see a rational post among these. I don't know either way as I don't hunt, but things weren't adding up with what I was seeing, and what you're saying adds up and makes sense. I wish there were more posters like you on these boards! Keep up the good work!
 
The usual problem: Unless you see the kill, it might be days or weeks before the kill is found, and the buzzards and coyotes have cleaned up the evidence.

Easy solution: CARRY A RIFLE. Shoot the wolf when he has dog in his belly. Call a lawyer and document the whole scene carefully.

It sounds like the problem isn't so much expanding range and reintroduction but the federal gob'ment's attitude about it. That said, I'm skeptical about anti-wolf tales. It's like up here, there can be a brown bear gnawing at some fellow's legs and he'll still be blaming the wolves for all the evils of the world. There's something about wolves that really gets certain people worked up into a lather.
 
I am sorry for his loss However hunting bear or pig with dogs chances are you run into wrong bear or pig dogs get hurt or killed, I've seen dogs get torn up by hogs, yes some passed. A loss yes but when put in harms way we all have risks. He put his dogs in harms way what if they ran into a big male bear who did not want to be treed? The bear would fight and inexperienced dogs would get hurt/killed. I love the sound of beagles chasing rabbits, or hounds on a hog,it is music however if you are not in time when the hog picks his ground fighting starts and wounds all around.Some of us treat wild land as if it were our backyard, sometimes it is not safe in our own backyard!! As far as carrying a firearm, I am sorry but yes i would be in fact a lawbreaker if I new my dogs would be in wolf country while treeing bears. If not for there own safety but mine as well, choice between shooting a wolf or becoming its meal there is no choice the wolf would not be feeding anymore!! Ranting and raving will not change laws, the only law I know in the wilderness is survival of the fittest. I am not going to argue about the wolves place, or regulations about not carrying a firearm during whatever season, just use common sense, laws are just that but my safety comes first!! My .02 and yes I hunt and own dogs I lost a great female at 5 and it hurt like hell, but in the woods I Pack.As far as his story I would not have left my dogs,dead or not to be eaten.
 
easy fella

they're bashing kali, not california residents.

seriously, though, kali would be such a ncie place to live if not for the blissninnys and whatnot.
 
Cosmoline, most ranchers I've known--and I, when I was running cattle on my place--check the stock pretty regularly; daily, if at all possible. We're not unable to read sign as to what sort of critters are ranging across the land.

If before wolves were reintroduced you have few losses to predation, and an increase in losses to predation after wolves are reintroduced, isn't it rational to infer a causal relationship? (I only know from reading, but it seems that predation on livestock by grizzlies is not all that common or steady--and there are no grizzlies in New Mexico, where predation has increased with the reintroduction of the Mexican Wolf.)

http://www.rangemagazine.com has quarterly issues. Their archives have a fair number of articles about the problems with wolves.

Art
 
Wow, That was one hell of a story. I feel sorry for the authors loss. All I can say is first off I would not be running around in the wilderness taking pictures of bears without some sort of sidearm on me at ALL times. The wolf that lunged at the author would have been full of .45 holes had it been me.
 
Cosmoline wrote: But if the folks in Id don't want wilderness, then so be it. I think we should reintroduce brown bear and wolves into California first, as the need for a dose of reality there is greatest.

I agree with all of your sentiments. Makes me want to move to Alaska. The one quoted above is absolutely PRICELESS!!

Birddog wrote: Nice job in breaking down the idiocy into digestible, confrontable bits. Threads like this just boggle the mind and give me little hope for the future of hunting if this is how a bunch of gun owners respond to the idea of hunting with hounds. What's next, bird dogs? I know I know...I've already gotten the nasty emails, like when my last book came out.

Don't get frustrated by the "it's cool to be tactical" crowd that don't identify with hunting. As a hunter, I agree with your sentiments regarding the "tactical crowd" (which is what they really are). However, I also find fault that most hunters see no threat to their firearm ownership and ignore the politics of gun ownership completely.
 
H&H Hunter has it right.

Within 10 miles of my place the USFW released a male and female in April.
At last count in June the pair killed 8 beef cows w/calves. The calves were not always found. The wolves just ate the milk udders and went to kill another.

Some facts:
There must be 3 seperate incidents before a wolf/wolves can be declared killers and removed by trap or "lethal means" . It doesn't matter how many domestic livestock are killed, 3 seperate incidents .
Once a kill order is authorized only a goverment employee can shoot a wolf and only under certain rules.
Only in the defense of human life is shooting a wolf legal and you better be able to prove you were in danger. Nothing else matters. The wolf is covered by the 1973 Endangered Species Act.
Penalties are listed here http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa.html#Lnk11

and the main page here http://www.fws.gov/ifw2es/mexicanwolf/

There is a $500,000.00 reward posted locally for a wolf killed illegally.


I believe that it is the same people and mentality of enviroment/wildlife saver groups as do that want gun control. So to side with the wolf reintroduction is to side with the same people who would take our gun rights away.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top