Woman utilizing self-defense gets her pistol taken but husband saves her with his pistol

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aim1

member
Joined
Oct 24, 2015
Messages
2,310
Using any type of instrument for self-defense leaves you open to having it taken and used against you. Luckily the husband was here to save his wife with his pistol.




https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...tedly-staring-young-daughters-bedroom-window/






Screenshot_20210629-145606_Chrome.jpg
 
My wife and I saw this this morning and thought the same thing. In fact, we asked ourselves why they even followed him off their property.
Why on earth did dad leave mom outside the convenience store to deal with the pervert while he went inside to alert the clerk to call the police?

There are more lessons here on what not to do than I recall seeing in any other single use of force incident.
 
Too much stupid going on in that one. Escalating a situation that was not a life/death one by bringing presenting a firearm.

being unprepared or unwilling to use it.

following someone you might have been within the law to draw a firearm on, on your property in Texas, at night, to a location where you are likely breaking the law…
 
The home owner did well.

They did everything wrong.

They pursued with deadly force at the ready after he fled the property meaning there was no imminent threat. Fail.
They attempted to hold the individual. Fail.
The person left to detain the perpetrator at gunpoint did not have the skill to retain the weapon. Fail.
The person left to detain the perpetrator at gunpoint did not have the will to use the weapon. Fail.
The weaker person was left to detain the perpetrator (a gun is not a magic talisman). Fail.

All around delusional behavior on the part of the parents in the proper use of weapons.
 
They did everything wrong.

They pursued with deadly force at the ready after he fled the property meaning there was no imminent threat. Fail.
They attempted to hold the individual. Fail.
The person left to detain the perpetrator at gunpoint did not have the skill to retain the weapon. Fail.
The person left to detain the perpetrator at gunpoint did not have the will to use the weapon. Fail.
The weaker person was left to detain the perpetrator (a gun is not a magic talisman). Fail.

All around delusional behavior on the part of the parents in the proper use of weapons.
And going outside with guns was BIG MISTAKE number one,
 
Watching too many "western" movies (for that couple) or Charles Bronson movies etc seems to have blurred their ability to distinguish between entertainment and common sense.

Could the couple have called 911, remained in their yard for the police to arrive, and if necessary have Only the father follow the weirdo at a serious distance, in order to assist the police?
 
His wife is in obvious new of dire shooting lessons.

I don’t think her marksmanship ability was tested. What was tested was her will to fight when she was attacked. SHE FAILED! She is only alive because the perp who disarmed her chose not to kill her. Who knows maybe he wasn’t up to shooting another human being either.

This couple failed when they decided to pursue the criminal after he refused to comply with the command to wait for the police. YOU CAN’T SHOOT SOMEONE FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH YOUR COMMANDS.

The encounter was over when the perp got up and ran out of the yard. Or it should have been. Once they decided to pursue they placed themselves on very shaky legal ground both criminally and civilly. I don’t know what Texas law says about making a citizens arrest. I do know that in every state I am familiar with the citizens arrest laws, a private citizen only has arrest powers if they observe a felony in progress. If the crime was as described in the two media accounts I read it was most likely a misdemeanor unless the perp had priors for that.

The husband would have held the perp at gunpoint and allowed his wife to make the 911 call. I believe things would have been better.

How would that have been better? He already ran from the husband once. What was the legal authority that gave the husband and wife the right to pursue and attempt an arrest?

What would we be talking about if he ran from the husband a second time and the husband shot him?

This incident is a perfect example of what NOT to do.
 
Assuming they didn't get a good look at the perp's face and can't get a good sketch on him when the cops comes through. You'd rather have them sit at home and waiting for the cops can chase a sick perv down the street.
Like it or not, that’s the law.


He could have been following her, Now let that sink it for a minute.

That is completely irrelevant. We have laws in this country, even in Texas. The law only allows a private citizen to take action to thwart crime under certain circumstances. Those laws exist to discourage people from doing things just like this.

People who contemplate using deadly force have to be able to take emotion out of the formula when making decisions like pursuing a suspect. If you can’t do that then you are likely to face serious consequences for your emotional act.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top