Wrong house. Deputy shoots dog, injures mom and child.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's good to see that the "code enforcement team" in Stockton is taking out the trash.

Yep they are keeping us safe from ourselves. And apparently its really hard to find the drug dealers and gang bangers so they have to go out and hassle some women children and dogs instead. Since they are having such a hard time finding the drug dealing and gang banging maybe some folks from Stockton could form a citizens commitee to show the PO PO where the dealers, and bangers hang out at.

Of course since Occifer safety is the #1 priority its much safer to shoot unarmed dogs, X-marines, women and small children.

After all thats what the Gestpo did.
 
I am tired of this crap. Someone in Congress needs to have a hearing on this type of thing instead of grandstanding for political hay. Hey how about Henry Waxman get off his rear and do something IMPORTANT.:fire:
 
Dayum!

I thought Richardson, Texas, code enforcement was hard-nosed when it enforces the "no branches lower than 14' shall overhang the street" ordinance with a nasty letter.

But, then, the city of Richardson likely expects its citizens to be armed & such foolishness as happened in Stockton would not long be tolerated.
 
I guess if it had been for 'double parking' they would have called in an air strike.

These 'isolated incidents' seen awfully common these days!
 
Last edited:
Someone in Congress needs to have a hearing on this type of thing
Why? People don't seem to care really. A&E's swat show regularly airs an instance or two of a swat team ripping a wall off a house and finding nothing and charging no one or charging someone with posession with a small amount of pot. Not only does it not seem to anger people, they seem to enjoy it as entertainment.
 
Why? People don't seem to care really. A&E's swat show regularly airs an instance or two of a swat team ripping a wall off a house and finding nothing and charging no one or charging someone with posession with a small amount of pot. Not only does it not seem to anger people, they seem to enjoy it as entertainment.

That's why you all need to watch the movie Idiocracy. That's one of Mike Judge's points in it.
 
responsibilties

I percieve some relation between this post and the "A dangerous game of dress up" post in this forum by xd9fan.

You would think that some type of cross check with an old fashioned printed record from another source would be made for verification purposes if not for safety and professionalism.

Just because it comes out of a computer, does not guarrantee accuracy.
 
That's why you all need to watch the movie Idiocracy. That's one of Mike Judge's points in it.
Oddly enough I got that from netflix last week. I'd never even heard of it, but after office space I'm willing to try it. Glad to hear I'll probably like it.
 
Idiocracy was not as good as Office Space, but still very funny. Some pretty biting social commentary.

The unfunny part was that we are headed in the direction he points...a Nation of Clevons.
 
The abatement team addresses unsafe living conditions and includes armed deputies for the safety of environmental health workers, Garcia said. A team includes a sergeant, two deputies, two environmental health workers and two code enforcement officers, and often a California Highway Patrol officer.
I thought things were bad around here, but I have NEVER heard of a housing code enforcement agency having a SWAT team.

That's so over the top I am (for once) left speachless (keyboard-wise ... what I'm thinking wouldn't pass muster with Art's grammaw).
 
Garcia released a few more details of the shooting Friday. He said 19-year veteran Deputy Terry Breitmaier fired a single shot at the dog's paw and that pockmarks in the house door jamb were from bullet fragments.
This sounds like the deputy intentionally targeted the dog's paw. I would think it was another stupid reporter error, but they're quoting an official here. I can't think of anything more preposterous
 
The cop is right. Whatever he did, there is a plausible explanation for why he did it, and he made the right decision.


And if they can't verbalize the plausible explanation immediately just give them some time. Cooking up excuses that will pass muster with the city attorney can take some time.

Seems like these infrequent mistakes are happening with a surprising amount of regularity.
 
Some further info on the 92 year old woman killed by police during a no-knock raid in Fulton County Ga.


Immediately after the incident it was being reported that she “opened fire” on UNIFORMED officers and that “[o]ne officer was shot 3 times – once in the leg, on the side of the face and once in his bulletproof vest. One officer was hit in the leg and another hit in their arm.” It was also reported that drugs were recover at the scene. [1]

This makes it sound like the she hit the officers with gun fire and that, while it may not have been her using or selling drugs, someone may have been.


However, the truth behind the story sounds more like an action film complete with police cover-up.

In fact, two of the officers involved (Gregg Junnier, 40, and Jason R. Smith, 35) have plead guilty to voluntary manslaughter, violation of oath by a public officer, criminal solicitation, making false statements and civil rights conspiracy. In exchange for cooperating with a federal corruption probe, prosecutors dropped state murder charges against Smith and Junnier, meaning they will avoid life in prison. Sentences have not been set, but Junnier, who retired from the force in January, is expected to get about 10 years in prison; Smith, who is on administrative leave, is expected to be sentenced to about 12 years. [2]

As it turns out:

“On the night of Nov. 21, plainclothes Atlanta police officers burst through the front door of Kathryn Johnston's home after obtaining a no-knock warrant based on false information that drugs were sold there.

Johnston fired a single shot from a .38-caliber revolver, according to the Fulton County prosecutor. Ballistic evidence showed that she did not hit any of the six officers, but that they fired 39 shots, striking Johnston five or six times, including a fatal blow to her chest.

Assistant U.S. Atty. Yonette Sam-Buchanan said officers lied to a magistrate to get the no-knock warrant, claiming that a confidential informant had made a purchase at the address and that the house was fitted with electronic surveillance.

After the shooting, Smith allegedly planted three bags of marijuana in the basement of Johnston's home and then called an informant to ask him to pretend the three officers had sent him to the address earlier to purchase drugs.

The next day, Smith and Junnier allegedly met to fabricate a story before meeting the department's homicide detectives.” [3]

So let’s recap. Plain cloths officers lied to obtain a warrant based on false information (likely bought) from an informant, burst into a home with no announcement of who they were, and then gunned down a woman who legitimately thought she was defending herself (probably against a home invasion). Once they realize their mistake they plant evidence and conjure up a false story.


IMHO, this is a prime example why no-knock warrants need to be outlawed.


Sources:

[1] http://www.wsbtv.com/news/10374909/detail.html

[2] http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/...2-year-old-woman-killed-in-botched-drug-raid/

[3] http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...7apr27,0,6937951.story?coll=la-home-headlines
 
IMHO, this is a prime example why no-knock warrants need to be outlawed.

They already are. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect citizens from unreasonable search and seizure, and no warrants are to be issued without probable cause. Supposed to....

Problem is, some courts have proclaimed no knock raids to be reasonable, and probable cause nowadays sometimes consists of taking the word of some unidentified "source," with some DAs more than eager to present (due to asset seizure laws) a skewed picture to the judge in order to get the warrant.

When you have this loose interpretation of the Fourth, combined with the lure of asset forfeiture, the results are predictable. And everytime one of these raids goes wrong, the authorities call it an "isolated incident."

Rather than just bitching about it, I have written to my congress-critters and attached the Cato Institute study of botched paramilitary raids.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top