Father Knows Best
Member
My father flew 31 missions as a waist gunner/toggalier aboard a B-17G in 1944-45, flying with the 15th Air Force from Foggia, Italy. In his later years, Dad finally related some of his experiences. I feel his was probably a better experience than the infantry grunts slogging through the jungles of Southeast Asia, or those fighting their way through Italy and western Europe. Still, Dad saw his share of planes next to his own simply explode, of be shot down violently, with the loss of all aboard.
I dunno about the "better experience" part of it. Sure, bomber crews got to return to warm meals and comfy beds every night, but the casualty rate was a lot higher than it was for the ground pounders. If your dad flew 31 missions, he was unusually lucky.
I'm not an expert, but I seem to recall hearing that the overall casualty rate for American infantrymen in the European theater was 10%, and something like 40-50% for bomber crews. Given those odds, I think I'd take a muddy foxhole in France or Belgium over an airbase in England or Italy.
That said(tm), I wonder how well I would handle infantry combat. I can easily see myself climbing into a bomber and setting off on a mission. Yes, you know that the odds of getting seriously injured or killed are high, but at the time you set out, the combat is pretty remote. By the time the shooting starts, you've got no choice but to fight and pray for the best.
I cringe, though, when I watch Saving Private Ryan or Band of Brothers. Could I really go over a wall, or charging up an alley, in the face of a hail of machine gun fire? Somehow, that seems an awful lot harder to do. And I don't think I can imagine anything more terrifying than what it must have been like to be crouched in a foxhole during an artillery barrage.