Hmong Immigrant Receives Life in Prison for Killing Deer Hunters in Wisconsin

Status
Not open for further replies.

XLMiguel

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
2,551
Location
Santa Fe, NM
Hmong Immigrant Receives Life in Prison for Killing Deer Hunters in Wisconsin

Bruce Crotteau, brother of Robert Crotteau and uncle of Joey Crotteau, both of who were killed by Chai Soua Vang, covers his face during testimony in Vang's sentencing hearing Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2005, in Hayward, Wis. Vang was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
11-08-2005 9:13 PM
By ROBERT IMRIE, Associated Press Writer

HAYWARD, Wis. -- A Hmong immigrant convicted of murdering six deer hunters and attempting to kill two others after a trespassing dispute was sentenced to life in prison Tuesday with no chance for parole.

Judge Norman Yackel ordered Chai Soua Vang, 37, to serve six life prison terms, one after the other, guaranteeing he would never be freed from prison. Wisconsin does not have a death penalty.

Yackel described Vang as a "time bomb ready to go off" at the slightest provocation.

Vang, a truck driver from St. Paul, Minn., was convicted on six counts of first-degree intentional homicide and three counts of attempted homicide in the Nov. 21 slayings.

The homicide charges carry a mandatory sentence of life in prison, but Yackel could have set a parole eligibility date for Vang. The judge also sentenced Vang to three concurrent terms of 40 years in prison on the attempted homicide charges.

Vang's attorney, Steve Kohn, said he would appeal but declined to elaborate.

The slayings occurred during the state's beloved deer hunting season and exposed racial tension between the predominantly white north woods residents and immigrants from the Hmong ethnic group.

Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager sought the maximum sentence for Vang, a father of seven children. She argued Vang would kill again unless he was locked up for the rest of his life, given his "explosive temperament" and lack of true remorse or regret.

Vang addressed the victims' families in court Tuesday but did not apologize.

"I understand your anger, your frustration, your grief," he said.

According to trial testimony, Vang said he got lost, went into a tree stand on the private land and was asked by another hunter, Terry Willers, to leave. Vang said he apologized and started walking away.

Other companions of Willers arrived, and there was an angry verbal confrontation and threats to report Vang to game wardens for trespassing.

Vang testified he fired in self-defense after one hunter angrily shouted profanities at him and used racial slurs before another fired at him.

Willers and the other wounded hunter, Lauren Hesebeck, said no one in their group pointed a gun at Vang before he opened fire.

Willers and Hesebeck indicated only one shot was fired at Vang _ by Hesebeck, who was already wounded and some of his friends lay mortally wounded on the ground.

Vang was convicted of killing Robert Crotteau, his son Joey Crotteau, Denny Drew, Allan Laski, Jessica Willers and Mark Roidt. All were relatives and friends who gathered to hunt from the Crotteaus' cabin near Exeland.


Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Well, you gotta' feel good about clothing and feeding him for the rest of his life, eh? :confused:

Larry
 
Such a tragedy. Jury didn't believe your story of being shot at first, did they, loser? Damn, I hope he gets gang-raped daily in the joint. :fire:
 
Hey just so long as he can't get at any more hunters. And +1 to too bad WI doesn't have the death penalty.
 
PHP:
Well, you gotta' feel good about clothing and feeding him for the rest of his life, eh?

It's a whole bunch cheaper keeping him in prison than it is to execute him under our current system. Death penalty trials cost more, mandatory appeals cost more, death row cell space costs more, all on the order of several hundred thousand dollars more.
 
Wasn't one of those killed a young guy, like 17? Someone needs to go tell his fellow prisoners he is there for murdering a kid. Ought to make his stay behind bars interesting. :evil:
 
Car Knocker said:
PHP:
Well, you gotta' feel good about clothing and feeding him for the rest of his life, eh?

It's a whole bunch cheaper keeping him in prison than it is to execute him under our current system. Death penalty trials cost more, mandatory appeals cost more, death row cell space costs more, all on the order of several hundred thousand dollars more.

Then obviously we should just abolish the DP? Right? :rolleyes:

Like most things, our justice system needs some tweaking.
 
DT Guy said:
Well, you gotta' feel good about clothing and feeding him for the rest of his life, eh? :confused:

Larry


It's pathetic but true that it costs $55,000 or more per year, to house an inmate in a Federal pen.

We have citizens breaking their ass to provide for their family and make ends meet that still don't earn this kind of money, or have the dental and medical benefits. Yet we provide it for murderers and child rapists!

That's the government continuing to spend your tax payer dollars wisely. :banghead:
 
I suppose that since WI doesn't practice Rehabilitation Through Reincarnation, life sentence is the best we could have asked for.
 
4v50 Gary said:
I suppose that since WI doesn't practice Rehabilitation Through Reincarnation, life sentence is the best we could have asked for.
No worries. Remember what happened to Jeffrey Dahmer in a WI prison?
 
+1 on death penalty does exist in wisconsin.

remember dahmer? he lasted two or three years.

vang will not last that long. I do have pity for his family, he leaves several kids fatherless.
 
Yeah, pity for his family... But I can't help but wonder if they aren't better off in the long run just like the rest of us. Sucks sure, but how much worse might it be to have such an individual living with ya?

DP - the only permanent solution.
 
If you look into the details of the case it all smells like long night of beans a nd cheap beer.
 
Why cant we all just... Get along?

Racial tensions are everywhere, hell even in sunny OC, CA I cant walk down the street without one person looking at me funny. Last week I was called racial slurrs outside campus... Buuut it's a free country, they can call me what they will. There will be justice in time(or very least, a flaming bag of doggie doodie).

sumpnz said:
Bummer WI doesn't have the death penalty.
if that were utah, he'd be in front of a fireing squad on the gallows
 
if that were utah, he'd be in front of a fireing squad on the gallows

Like Texas, where a guy can get released after years on death row when DNA evidence comes back to support the defendant's alibi. Where prosecutors routinely engage in misconduct with impunity. Where incompetent court-appointed lawyers can catch a nap during trial, and the appellate court sees absolutely nothing wrong with that.

All of this is documented.

Oh yeah, if you trust the system, you'll love the DP.

Vang got what he deserved. Justice was served.
 
Like most things, our justice system needs some tweaking.
Yup - here's a tweek for ya -

Head Juror: "Your honor, the jury recommends the death penalty."

Judge: "Balif - take this man outside and shoot him." *rap*

-
 
java - That's part of the reason why I thing the DP should be reserved for cases where there is incontrovertible proof of the perp's guilt. E.g. video tape, willing confession (without the appearance of coersion), DNA evidence with no other possible rational explanation, multiple independant eye witnesses - some of whom knew the perp, etc.

In this case, Vang openly admitted to killing those people, and even testified that some did not deserve to die. I'd call that pretty darn incontrovertable. Therefore I think he should fry.

I oppose the DP in cases like Scott Peterson. Sure, it all but certain he actually did it, but there's still that small doubt. No identifible crime scene. No DNA evidence, even in the boat (yeah there was the one hair, but I could probably find plenty of my wife's hair in my garage even though she rarely goes out there). No witnesses of any kind. Therefore I think he should rot in jail for the rest of his life rather than get a needle in his arm.
 
Wonder if Christopher Scarver is still on the bathroom janitorial crew?
 
I oppose the DP in cases like Scott Peterson. Sure, it all but certain he actually did it, but there's still that small doubt. No identifible crime scene. No DNA evidence, even in the boat (yeah there was the one hair, but I could probably find plenty of my wife's hair in my garage even though she rarely goes out there). No witnesses of any kind. Therefore I think he should rot in jail for the rest of his life rather than get a needle in his arm.

Do you remember that, what was it, oh yeah- "Beyond a reasonable doubt"?
Not, "Preponderance of the evidence"

So if there is any doubt, he shouldn't be in jail at all.
 
I would agree that he's guily beyond "reasonable" doubt. I just can't say that I think he's guilty beyond "all" doubt. Hence the fact that I'm fine with putting him in jail for life, but not on death row.

Now the Hmoung "hunter"? He's guilty beyond "all" doubt. So as far as I'm concerned he can fry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top