walmart to block racy headlines in magazine racks at checkout counters

Status
Not open for further replies.

spacemanspiff

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
4,066
Location
alaska
news story from yahoo

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Magazine covers with racy headlines and pictures at Wal-Mart check-out lines will be getting a little coverage of their own.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on Friday said it is rolling out magazine racks that partially cover the pictures and catchy but usually sex-oriented headlines of four women's magazines -- considering them as "provocative."

"For at least a year we'd been getting some feedback ... from customers who were uncomfortable with (the covers)," Wal-Mart spokesman Jay Allen said on Friday. Many of the complaints came from customers who were shopping with small children and saw the racy headlines.

The magazines affected are Hearst Corp.'s Redbook, Cosmopolitan and Marie Claire and Conde Nast's Glamour. Copies of these same magazines, which often have headlines on sex advice, will be available in full view at the back of Wal-Mart stores.

Maurie Perl, senior vice president of corporate communications for Conde Nast, declined to comment. Hearst officials were not immediately available.

The move, which will only affect those magazines sold at the check-out racks, comes a month after the world's largest retailer pulled from its shelves three men's magazines known for cover photos of scantily-clad models.

Family friendly Wal-Mart has been bowing to customer complaints on certain items sold in its stores. It has refused to sell certain CD's with explicit lyrics, pulled controversial toys and other products which it felt offended customers.


its about dang time. though i think they should go a few steps further. block out the headlines from tabloids and that god-awful magazine of orpahs. same with the magazines about food and cooking, they just encourage people to eat more. and the ones about soap operas, they just make people watch more meaningless tv shows.
 
They recently pulled some of their racier mens magazines off the shelves due to customer requests too. I think the ones they no longer sell are Maxim and Stuff.

brad cook
 
More power to them. I just luv sitting in the checkout line at Kroger and letting my 1st grade daughters sound out the covers of Cosmo, etc out loud. HOW TO PLEASE YOUR LOVER WITH YOUR.... Daddy, what's that mean?
 
I think it's absolutely ridiculous that Wal-Mart will not sell music with explicit lyrics, but will sell R-rated movies.

I own several albums that really only have a few explicit words in the lyrics and some with quite a bit of off-color lyrics, but Wal-Mart only sells the edited versions of those albums. However, they happily offer up movies like Pulp Fiction, Full Metal Jacket, etc. with enough foul language, drugs, sex, violence, and the like to last a lifetime (not that there's anything wrong with that ;) ). And I will not buy an edited CD, I want my cussing damn-it! :D

It's a preposterous double standard that I just don't understand.

Wal-Mart has a policy to not sell R-rated movies to those under 18. When one is scanned for purchase, the register prompts the cashier to check of an I.D. Why they can't so the same for music with explicit lyrics baffles me. If they don't want to sell certain items, that's their choice, but this policy is flat out inconsistent and quite simply ludicrous.

Moreover, though, Wal-Mart really doesn't need be the polite and proper police, but that's another debate.
 
I was at Wal Mart about a month ago, and standing at the checkout I had to laugh. There was a tabloid that had a headline that said something like "Shame of Graceland (next to a picture of Lisa Marie Presley)...Lisa Marie Admits to Drinking Till She Blacked Out", or words to that effect. I told the guy behind me "Yeah, that's really the shame of Graceland. On the other hand, I'm sure Elvis would have really been proud to have Michael Jackson as his son in law!" :rolleyes: Good grief. geegee
 
Let's not kid ourselves here. This is no better than Wal-mart removing handguns or other gun-related items from thier stores for PC reasons. Because someone was uncomfortable that thier child was able to view a gun or something else. OH MY GOD!

And those of you here that think this is a good idea should really reevaluate your stance.

GT
 
Let's not kid ourselves here. This is no better than Wal-mart removing handguns or other gun-related items from thier stores for PC reasons. Because someone was uncomfortable that thier child was able to view a gun or something else. OH MY GOD!
I disagree. As the father of three kids (two of them under 8 years of age), I can enter into a pretty reasonable discussion of firearms anytime with my kids, and certainly have. This has little to do wth being PC, but more with dealing with topics that are rarely appropriate for the the eyes of young children. That's my opinion, and any parent is welcome to their own, but when it's stuck right in front of the kid's face the choices of the parent are removed. We're not talking about women in swimsuits here but rather topics like sexual techniques, "pleasing your partner till his eyes roll back," etc. If a store wants to sell that magazine, it's up to them to see if it's customer's demands are strong enough to buy them.

As I see it, it's a free market issue. If enough customers send the message that they not only wouldn't buy the magazine, but will take their business elsewhere, the store manager then has a decision to make: keep the mags on a shelf covered, or remove them. Conversely, if enough customers send a message that they want those magazines made available, the manager needs to figure out a way to accomodate them as well, perhaps by placing them in another location, or covering them. These magazines haven't been removed, but have instead been made more difficult to view by kids. geegee
 
And those of you here that think this is a good idea should really reevaluate your stance.
Let me see if I understand you correctly. If a private company wishes to display the products that they bought for the purposes of resale; then the surest way to ensure freedom is to restrict their ability to make their own decision? :confused: :confused: :confused:

Personally, I think that if the producers of that trash don't like what Wally-World is doing, then they should peddle said trash elsewhere. The gutter would seem to be the most logical starting point for that most important of all business axioms: LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
This is no better than Wal-mart removing handguns or other gun-related items from thier stores for PC reasons.
thankfully we dont have that problem up here in Alaska. walmart has never stopped selling firearms. they did move the EBR's to teh back room, but they are still sold, just out of the eye of the public.
 
thankfully we dont have that problem up here in Alaska. walmart has never stopped selling firearms. they did move the EBR's to teh back room, but they are still sold, just out of the eye of the public.

They still sell handguns too? All of the other WalMart stores still sell rifles and shotguns but they stopped selling handguns.

brad cook
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top