Speedo66
Member
Well, when the NY Times does an anti gun article, it catches the attention of many people, including state and Federal legislators. This article attacks lead bullets from the prospective of hunters, how they want to move away from them. While not an anti-gun article per se, it certainly is not in our favor.
The article also shows the female hunter holding the expanded copper bullet in her bloody hand. No doubt hundreds of NY Times readers will be seeking therapy having seen an animal's blood.
I don't know about you, but I've never heard another hunter express these thoughts. Maybe I live in a microcosm, but what I've heard is how expensive copper bullets are.
The article talks about how many states currently ban lead, and we all know that lead is prohibited for waterfowl hunting.
Makes you wonder what will happen to all our ammo stashes if lead is banned completely for any type of shooting.
Here's the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/24/...html?action=click&module=News&pgtype=Homepage
The article also shows the female hunter holding the expanded copper bullet in her bloody hand. No doubt hundreds of NY Times readers will be seeking therapy having seen an animal's blood.
I don't know about you, but I've never heard another hunter express these thoughts. Maybe I live in a microcosm, but what I've heard is how expensive copper bullets are.
The article talks about how many states currently ban lead, and we all know that lead is prohibited for waterfowl hunting.
Makes you wonder what will happen to all our ammo stashes if lead is banned completely for any type of shooting.
Here's the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/24/...html?action=click&module=News&pgtype=Homepage