StationOps
Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2018
- Messages
- 75
Polish Maroszek vz 38 m in both 30-06 and 8mm Mauser.
Polish Maroszek vz 38 m in both 30-06 and 8mm Mauser.
+1 for the Glock in 7.62x25A Webley Mk lV in .45 Colt
A Glock 17L in 7.65X25 and 5.7X28.
Winchester 52D in .22, .22 mag, and 17HMR
Winchester Model 24 SXS in 10,12,16,20,28 and 410.
Benelli M-4 in 10ga 3 1.2 inch.
Original Walther "pre-war" PP in .22 LR and PPK in .32 and .380
94 Winchester military musket.
QUALITY scopes (i.e. Night Force, S&B, Swarovski) in straight 2X, 4X and 6X power.
The SKS isn’t appropriately scaled for the 7.62x39 either lol.An SKS in 5.56 that is appropriately scaled for the smaller cartridge, and therefore a lighter rifle. It must be scope-able.
View attachment 872409
A concept....
You know a Semi-Lewis gun would be kinda cool
It would used Pedersen's locking system used in the Remington Model 51. Since this system allows the barrel to be fixed and immobile, it has the potential for better accuracy. How it works is fairly straight forward. Using the cartridge case as a piston, the breech block is allowed to move rearward about 0.085" before it is stopped by the locking recesses in the frame. As the breech block moves rearward, it carries the slide with it, imparting the slide with some velocity. Once the breech block stops, the slide moves back for another 0.10" or so then picks up the breech block similar to an SKS or FAL, and completes the cycle.You got any more drawings?
How does the thing lock? Tilting barrel or the Remington thing? My guess would be that if Remington didn't have to avoid the patents they would have made the barrel tilt, or at least a solid slide. I'm a little foggy on how the "hesitation lock" thingy works, but I think the slide being in parts had a hand in that.
The thing looks cool, just don't know how this hybrid 1911/Remington 53 thing would work.
Do you intend on trying to make it?
Wow, you know never thunked that before.. But it would be cool (ouch bad pun).. I wonder if you would want to fin barrel attachment under the shroud or you would be happy with just pulling the air over the barrel. I can not imagine younger folks putting up with that extra weight of the radiator fin attachment?? Part 78..I fantasize over an AR with handguard past the muzzle, vented only at rear for the muzzle blast to pull cooling air through.
Picture pictures please...JP has a line of finned aluminum barrel radiators, somebody is humping them.
Is there a shield that goes over these???See thermal dissipators at
https://www.jprifles.com/1.4.5_hs.php
Actually, the grip safety of the Pedersen stays in the depressed position when the hammer is down. All the thumb safety did was pull the grip safety to the depressed position, or lock it depressed, depending on whether the hammer was cocked or not. And to simplify the design, that basic feature would be retained. The Pedersen safety axis is the hammer pin, the "round plug" seen on the Model 53 is the hammer pin, the removal of the safety lever actually complicates the retention hammer pin.I trust you are omitting the grip safety and see you are returning the thumb safety. (I once read that the prototype started out with a thumb safety but it was removed for the last round of Navy trials. There is a round plug in the right position.)
There are so many brands and nithling little variations of 1911 magazine, you might do better to have your own. Maybe from a S&W 945,
Those will fit under a "standard" free float hand guard.Is there a shield that goes over these???
My error, I got the directions backward. It just blocks the grip safety from being depressed.I figured that the thumb safety of my PA51 only blocked out the grip safety but never looked inside.
Those will fit under a "standard" free float hand guard.