What motivates your purchase of a new rifle?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Legionnaire

Contributing Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
8,640
Location
Texas
Generally speaking, at this stage of your shooting career, what most often motivates your purchase of a new (to you) rifle? Do have have an application not adequately covered by your current long guns? Are you intrigued by the history (or newness) and/or form factor of a rifle you don't have and it's the gun itself that grabs your fancy? Or do you become intrigued by a cartridge and then look for an appropriate rifle to launch it? Maybe you're a collector looking to fill out a set, or maybe you are an opportunistic bargain hunter who can't pass up on a good deal. I'm sure there are others.

My most recent acquisitions have largely fallen into the "that's a cool cartridge and I need a rifle to shoot it" category. That would be true of the Bergara Premier HMR Pro in 6.5 PRC, the home-assembled "Remage" in .22-250 Ackley Improved, and the semi-custom Remington 700 Mountain Rifle in .280 Remington that my smith is currently rebuilding as a .280 Ackley. True too for the Ruger Hawkeye African in .375 Ruger. In all cases, I was primarily motivated by the cartridge.

So thinking back over your last two or three acquisitions, is there a pattern?
 
Last edited:
I have every base covered that I need a rifle for.
So for me, buying a new one would strictly be motivated by something I like and want, which is a perfectly valid justification in my book.

For example, I want a lever action in .44 magnum or .45 Colt. I don't need it. I have a .22 for small game, 2 rifles suitable for deer hunting etc. I just want it.
 
@Arkansas Paul, I get that need and want are two different things, and I have no argument with someone buying anything they want and can afford. I'm curious if there is a pattern to what drives one's wants. For me it tends to be interest in a cartridge ... even though I have multiple cartridges that accomplish more or less the same thing. @LoonWulf basically said "anything interesting" and he's a man of broad interests; that's just fine.

ETA: I realize my interest in cartridges grew out of my interest in hand loading. There is no way I would pursue some of the cartridges I currently shoot if I wasn't able to load for them. Hence my response in the "only one milsurp bolt action" thread. I don't own a milsurp bolt action, mostly because I'm not particularly interested in the cartridges ... although I might jump on a Swedish Mauser in 6.5x55, because I am interested in that cartridge.
 
Last edited:
In theory there is a need or a supposed need there. At least that's the excuse.

Handguns are different, all over the board. Sometimes the deal is too good to pass up is enough if I have the cash at the time.

-Jeff
 
I'm still buying guns to fill gaps in my arsenal, even if I have to make up a reason that doesn't exist. Such as what if a 44 mag isn't enough within 100yrds? I need a 458 socom. What if I need to shoot further than what I can see? I need a 338 lapua
 
I'm curious if there is a pattern to what drives one's wants. For me it tends to be interest in a cartridge ...

I get that.
I've always thought I was born 150 years too late and gravitate to things that were in use in the old west.
I love single action six guns and lever rifles. That's why I want the levergun in the .44 or .45 I reckon.
 
And do you sell or otherwise get rid of the old one after it has been replaced? I did get rid of all my .30 cals after I adopted 6.5 and 7 mms.

It depends. I have some older guns with too much history to part with that I keep even though I almost never shoot them. And it often takes some time to "let go". In the last month or so I've sold a dozen rifles and handguns that I finally decided to part with. Some of them I've had since the 1980's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top