Decided to do something silly-just because I could 1911 in 380 acp

Status
Not open for further replies.

AbitNutz

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
975
Yeah, I know it may be totally impossible to make work but I'm going to try. Why? No reason what so ever. I'm having a 5" Gov't barrel with a Clark/Para ramp chambered for 380 acp.

I think I have the extraction figured out. I have an AFTEC extractor that I have used in my 22 TCM and that will grab the smaller rim cartridge, no problem. I've measured and the 22 TCM and the 380 acp are about identical.

Feeding is going to be trial and error. I have a single stack magazine where I can essentially put a spacer strip at the back to move the cartridge closer to the ramp in varying increments.

There's going to have to be a dance between the magazine spring, slide spring and mainspring to strip off a round. I have springs that go to ridiculously light weights; which will likely will not be enough. I'm sure I'll have to really ramp the firing pin stop so it has almost no resistance.

Now quit asking why. I don't know why. I just thought it would be interesting to see if I could make it work.
 
Sure hope you are successful. I’ve always enjoyed shooting my vintage Llama 380’s, they are true mini 1911’s. I bet it is even more fun with a full size 1911.
 
It sounds like a fun project. They make an 8lb. recoil spring you could probably use. I have a 9mm 1911 that I use the 8lb. spring for 115gr. powder puff loads. If you reload you could also load the rounds a bit long to help feeding.
 
The funny part about this project is that everyone I tell about it wants to try it if it works.
I've got a really good extractor an enormous ejector and weak springs. I'll begin by seeing if I can get a single round to fire, extract, eject and then lock back the slide. Then I'll work on seeing if I can get it to strip a round out of the magazine. You really can't use heavier than 95 grain bullets because the brass will bulge. I'll work a step at a time. Heck, I got a 38/45 Clerk to work and that was a giant pain in the a$$. I also managed to get a 7.62x25 Tokarev to function really well out of a 1911 using a 38 super magazine. Now I admit that a 380 acp is a whole new bucket of chicken and may not be possible but we'll see...
 
I wish you luck with the 380 ACP 1911 project. Keep us in the loop.

I've done some interesting things with 1911's such as 38/45 Clerke and 38 Special chamberings.

But, the Browning 1911-380 is a nice, scaled down 1911 that shoot 380 ACP.
 
So I ran some crude numbers through a recoil calculator which give me a rough idea of the difference between the 22 TCM and the 380. I have a Rock Island Target in 22 TCM and it functions perfectly. I expect the 380 to have a bit more velocity as it will be coming out of a 5" barrel. It won't be much but small amounts may make a difference here.

I thought about cheating and using a Commander slide but I'm going to stick with a full size Government. If went compact that would be defeating the silliness of this entire exercise.

I just checked manually running a full magazine through the Rock Island 22 TCM using a 9mm barrel; I haven't gotten the 380 barrel from the folks I ordered it from yet. Shockingly, every last round went through without a hitch. That was with the hideously expensive AFTEC extractor and a Wilson ejector. Of course, that is no guarantee that will have any basis in reality when it goes to fire a live round. But at least I know it will grab the rim and apparently extract and eject. This frame uses a Clark/Para ramp and a double stack magazine with Wolff magazine, recoil, firing pin and mainspring springs. I was using factory ammo and each round fed perfectly no matter how I dropped the slide. Now that may be because the 9mm hole is larger than the 380 hole.

So far, I am at least hopeful this can work. I really don't want to get into a situation where I have to keep increasing the powder charge to try and gain functionality. That would be chasing disaster.

22 TCM
Bullet Weight: (gr) 40
Bullet Velocity: (fps) 2070 fps
Powder Charge Weight: (gr) 10.5
Firearm Weight: (lbs) 40 OZ
Recoil Impulse (lbs.sec) .6
Recoil Velocity (fps) 7.3
Recoil Energy (ft.lbf) 2.32

380 acp
Bullet Weight: (gr) 95
Bullet Velocity: (fps) 1000
Powder Charge Weight: (gr) 4.5
Firearm Weight: (lbs) 40 OZ
Recoil Impulse (lbs.sec) .52
Recoil Velocity (fps) 6.71
Recoil Energy (ft.lbf) 1.75
 
I think it will work well.
In my Kimber 9mm Target I can run some ridiculously low loads with full function using a 22# mainspring and a 10# action spring.
 
I have wanted somebody to make a full size 1911 in 380 for twenty years. By somebody I mean a major manufacturer.
I used to see so many people that had trouble racking slides and handling recoil that a 1911 in 380 would be perfect for them.
Now that the S&W 380EZ is out, that market space is probably gone.
 
Anything full size in the 32 and 9mm size range is fun. Like others have mentioned, the Llama Especial .380 was an awesome pistol and I let mine slip away to my dad. I will get it back someday because he isn’t ever letting it go. I can’t imagine a full size gun built with better parts being any less fun, and with .380 you should have an impressive magazine capacity. Would make for a great bunny pistol.

.380 conversions from 9mm aren’t usually too terrible, and one shown here recently on a beretta 92 type pistol was impressive by taking locking breech and making it straight blowback. A browning tilting barrel setup with linkage will be more difficult but also very interesting. Once you have the .380 up and running I would suggest considering 32naa for your next project. Bottleneck in 1911 may be difficult, but if .380 works then the 32naa shouldn’t be much more difficult, especially if your using the .380 gun and essentially just swapping barrels.
 
The problem with a 32 acp in a full sized locked breech 1911, besides the obvious power needed to run the slide, is the lack of a magazine. The 380 acp will run in most magazines I have tried so far. Interestingly enough it seems to run amazingly well (by hand) in the Rock Island double stack that they use for their 22 TCM/9MM. However, it also seems to work equally well in my Kimber single stack 38 Super Target. The feed lips hold the 380 acp just fine and the shorter length of the cartridges don't seem to matter, especially if it uses a ramped barrel. I will use the longest, heaviest bullet available and seat it out as far out as practical. But only if some 100gr, 1020 fps factory ammo I have here won't work. It would be awesome if I can get factory ammo to work right out of the gate. It won't be much of a victory if I can't get at least some brands of factory ammo to work.
Modifying a 1911 magazine to run 32 acp cartridges would be the real trick. You don't even begin to mess with another thing till you have that. Altering a magazine is an art, especially to that degree. We all know how finicky magazines can be and they would be even worse in a finicky gun.
 
Modifying a 1911 magazine to run 32 acp cartridges would be the real trick
The best dodge there would be to start with existing 9mm 1911 mags.
As a guess, they will want either a 2mm stop at the front or the rear, with a corresponding cut in the follower.
My reflex says start with the back, as the lips will still hold the round at about the right spot.

Skipping the locked breech and keeping the slide mass in a blowback operation might (only might) be the other key. Otherwise, a lightweight slide might be required, Al, Ti, or the like. (Ok, just suppressed a shudder over the thought of milling a Ti 1911 slide.)
 
I just ordered some extra light Wolff return springs. They have a set that includes a 5,6,7,8 and 9 pound springs. I'm not sure a 5 pound spring will return a slide.
 
I just got my springs from Wolff. I'm still waiting for the barrel so in the mean time I'm super polishing everything and angling up the firing pin stop.

I ordered the barrel with a Clark/Para ramp. It's very unlikely that I'll have to polish the ramp coming from this barrel maker. I'll let everyone in on who the barrel maker is if this works. If it doesn't work, why would anyone care?

The barrel link and slide stop are another area I'm looking at. I'm not sure where I got it but I have a slide stop with a roller in the pin.

I'm also polishing the slide rails and anything else that makes contact. I want this to be as low friction as possible. We'll see how low I can drop the hammer spring.

I put the Wolff #5 recoil spring in it just to see how it felt. It will pick up a round out of a full magazine and push it into a 9mm magazine, which proves almost nothing but it did it.

I'm going to use a Briley Spherical Barrel Bushing. I think they work really well and are also extremely slick.

So far, I'm very hopeful. I'm still not kidding myself. This still may flat not work. Again, I want to be able to shoot the majority of factory 380 acp ammo. I don't want to get into the situation where I have to handload an over pressure 380 to 9mm ballistics to make it work.
 
This reminds me of the short-lived development of the 38 Special wadcutter firing 1911's back in, what, the 1950's or the 1960's? Especially the rimless 38 AMU version. (AMU = Army Marksmanship Unit, IIRC.)

But this has the advantages of readily available ammo or brass, plus better magazine capacity than the rimmed 38 wadcutter guns.
 
You really can't use heavier than 95 grain bullets because the brass will bulge.
Are you building a blowback gun? Glock 42 fires 102 grain ammunition with no issues. It starts extracting after the pressure has dropped and the brass contracted.
 
this won't be too hard. 9mm 1911's are already common. File off the locking lugs, weld a solid lug under the barrel, and bend the lips of the 9mm magazine until it works. Mill the firing pin channel a new hundreds to center, shim the old wall, bend a 9mm ejector. The lack of moving barrel angles will make feedlip tuning easier than normal. I don't think you can make a fullsize slide cycle on .380 with a locked break. Could probably do it without one easy enough. The end result would be accurate and fun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top