.455_Hunter
Member
Good grief that’s the exact argument anti gunners use when pushing for capacity limits. I mean the odds say you’ll never need a gun. But you still carry?
Right. The odds say you don't every need a gun, but there are examples of people actually needing a gun every day. It's really not a debate.
That's a bit different than a scenario where many people fully prepare/train to avoid being undergunned in an extended violent encounter with multiple attackers, but actually being undergunned with consequential negative outcome has almost zero actual occurrences as a civilian carrier.