Next to caliber choice, capacity seems to be the other topic gun people tend to way over-think.
But another thing I notice is that some seem to believe that they can take on three, four or five adversaries, presumably with at least a couple of them armed, and manage to take them all out (or get them to flee) because they're carrying a concealed handgun, especially if they have lots of rounds on tap...
That's just not how it always works. ...
Yep. Gun enthusiasts seem to enjoy discussing all manner of attributes of their favorite gun(s), ammunition, etc. It's always easier to discuss and argue the purported merits of make/model, caliber, finish, capacity, features (manual safety v. no manual safety, etc), size, weight, and so on ... than to discuss the ability of any particular owner/user to actually use the gear under stress and duress.
It's always easy to argue about some feature or attribute being an 'advantage' in some hypothetical situations and set of circumstances. The old,
'prove I'm wrong' response is easy to use, and it comforts some folks who want to validate their own preferences. Hey, let folks do as they wish (presuming it's not unlawful, or violates some employment requirement or policy). Folks make the wrong choices for circumstances every day, and sometimes they pay for it with their lives. Sometimes the wrong choice is offset by luck, or someone else making an even
worse wrong choice. Timing might offset a bad choice, too. Sometimes the best 'right' choice simply doesn't prove to be an advantage, after all. Them's the breaks.
Make your best informed choice, and hope for the best. Might happen. Might not.
Just don't ignore the owner/user end of the equation, hoping that 'more' or 'better' gear (incl ammo) will prove to be a guarantee that makes the the difference. Life seems to be unpredictable that way.