Too much safety?

Status
Not open for further replies.
...Sho what's with the over emphasis on guns? I mean a car, knife, skilsaw, etc... can kill you just as efficiently as a gun, but do we see power tool guntrol advocates in the news? No, we see gun control freaks out there.

No, they sure can't. While many things CAN kill you, guns were specifically created to kill you -- and as I said before, they're really good at it.

When you start seeing movies with the gang bangers pulling a Skilsaw out of their sagging pants and running screaming at a house to do a drive-by sawing, you can start using this line of reasoning.
 
thanks to the op; I have many dangerous devices in the home and barn. The children have been taught to avoid certain items (no exceptions) .. I take offense when any entity believes they know what's best for my kids. Of course the world contains morons and unfortunately some become parents.
 
I'm not worried about my kids but I do worry about the others that come to visit mine.
 
People use guns to kill, because guns are really good at doing that. This whole line about guns just being a misunderstood collection of parts is hogwash. Guns are deadly weapons, and should be respected as such. They're not autonomous killing machines, but they are certainly deadly tools -- and intended to be. Yes, truth certainly does have a ring to it, but I don't see it in this statement.

This is the mission statement of the anti crowd.

My guns have the ability to kill, and some of them were designed to, but you and other antigun radicals fail to realize many of us shoot for recreation, and many guns are created with sport and recreational shooting in mind.

Fried foods kill more Americans than guns ever have, or ever will.

No, they sure can't. While many things CAN kill you, guns were specifically created to kill you -- and as I said before, they're really good at it.

When you start seeing movies with the gang bangers pulling a Skilsaw out of their sagging pants and running screaming at a house to do a drive-by sawing, you can start using this line of reasoning.

I feel silly, I was duped into your game. Troll indeed.
 
One of the best IMO via OP et. al.

...

Definitely a ~ Words of Wisdom ~ thread

My thanks to the OP and to those that also responded with other words of wisdom.

It's like the good ol days of great "Hanger talk" at various airports with other Pilots.

Refreshing, like a full meal, then digesting it, and then desert.. ;)

One of the best post-threads I have read in a while - just a great meal - food for thought, with an understanding of:

Less is More,

Thanks,


Ls
 
Fried foods kill more Americans than guns ever have, or ever will.

im sorry, but that is not even remotely close to being true.....


.....are guns dangerous tools, yes, otherwise we wouldnt have such strict rules when it came to handeling and and using them......

i dont have to worry about someone getting hurt if i incorrectly use a foam pool noodle......but if you muzzle sweep someone with a firearm, there is a potential for injury or death....
 
M-Cameron, did you even read the whole OP? How about the part about how muzzle sweep avoidance was automatic for the OP and his buddy? I think many here zoned in on the guns in a kid's room part of the post and missed the point entirely.
 
im sorry, but that is not even remotely close to being true.....
Well, yes...if by "fried foods" you mean health concerns brought on at least in part by lifestyle.

In 2007, heart disease alone killed over 616,000 people. Assault (homicide) to include unarmed and armed with any kind of weapon at all was the cause of just a little over 18,000 deaths. Accidents of all kinds only took another 124,000 -- and gun accidents are an extremely small percentage of that total. http://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_19.pdf

Edit to add:
The DOJ says in 2005, 11,500 or so folks died in homicides by firearm.

Firearms accidents account for 0.5% of accidental deaths, according to the NRA, which would indicate that 620 of those 124,000 who accidentally bumped themselves off did so with firearms.

Suicides did take a little over 34,500. Seems about 57% of suicides are committed with a firearm. Call that 19,700 then.

It would be hard to say that guns were involved in any way with "more" deaths than health concerns such as those exacerbated by poor diet. Looks like around 32,000 people died as a result of something having to do with a firearm, vs. 616,000 from heart disease alone, that year. So lets say 19:1 against.
 
Last edited:
This is the mission statement of the anti crowd.

That's your opinion. If what someone says is true, a person who's willing to be honest with themselves will be willing to accept that.

My guns have the ability to kill, and some of them were designed to, but you and other antigun radicals fail to realize many of us shoot for recreation, and many guns are created with sport and recreational shooting in mind.

This is simple knee-jerk rhetoric. If you will look at what I said, you'll see there's nothing about guns being used ONLY for killing. I said that's what they were originally designed for -- but since I don't hunt, I only use mine for target shooting.

Since you know nothing about me, implying that I'm anti-gun because I advocate treating guns with the respect they deserve is absurd.

Fried foods kill more Americans than guns ever have, or ever will.

So do auto accidents, cancer, etc. You do what you can to protect yourself from all sources of danger, but that doesn't mean you ignore the danger.



I feel silly, I was duped into your game. Troll indeed.

You should feel silly -- because that's how your "rebuttal" sounds. If you can't handle discussing something with someone with a different opinion than yours, perhaps you should evaluate your logical base. Is it derived from fact, or more from a reaction to the blind accusations of completely anti-gun ranters?

In this area, as with politics or religion, keeping an open mind is healthy. If you can't handle having your pre-conceived notions questioned, maybe they're not worth defending.
 
I agree with lonestar, less is more. Many posts have been right on the money IMO.. gun accidents consist of an incredibly low percentage of screw-ups. Maybe gun owners are being more responsable than the average citizen. I like to believe so
 
To think, 60 years ago, elementary kids were riding the bus to school with their guns with them.
 
I have never worried about my kid, but some of his aquaintences are a different story. Security of firearms in my house is based on me not always being there and me not always knowing who is.
 
That was what I meant Sam... OP... great post. And thanks for your insights on this matter. I think you have the right idea.
 
Sorry for the delay. I had to go take care of a couple numb-skulls who definitely need not own firearms much less be issued them. Oh well,
Maybe I should have put the opening line in the bottom?

Mountain man- I don't think guns or any dangerous item should just be handed out blindly to anyone children or adult. Not to sound anti, but there are allot of people with them that shouldn't have them. On the flip side, I know of allot of kids who can handle the responsibility of dangerous items. How many have kids who ride dirt bikes? My oldest (sorry I am proud of my kids, I guess) used my little trim saw to help cut wood last year. The same thing applied there. Safety was ingrained with the learning of how to use the item. It was not a separate class. Is that not how you were taught to climb? The audibles were part of how to climb and natural as part of the process.

You say guns are meant to kill. In the Corps, or any military service, you are right. A military man may have to kill just because it is the enemy he is looking at. But NEVER should any civilian view them as such. Not even LEO's. Why? There job is to save lives. I may kill a deer at home, but I feed my family with it and as such we live. An officer may need to use his one day in defense of himself or others so that they may live. For me once this uniform is off (actually I hunt in it, but you get the point) my firearms are tools for living.

You question whether people focusing on gun safety makes them dangerous. Well, how about this. you may take precautions as you climb, but when talking to others is that your focus? Or is it on the enjoyment of breaking that crest, or just hanging for a moment and enjoying the view? And I bet more than half of the non-climbers you talk to are so caught up in that part. They may not want to try it, but they won't tell you you're wrong to do so. With firearms the first thing a non shooter says is how dangerous a gun is. Right off the bat they are considered in that light. By stressing how careful we are we only make this worse. After all anything you have to treat so cautiously must be horribly unstable. Right after that they hop in their car and drive off in even more danger.

My oldest was so scared after the hunting education course spent half of their time on weapon safety, I had to convince her they weren't so bad.
"Daddy is my 410 really that bad?"
"Do you plan to do something you shouldn't with it?"
"No"
"Then no it isn't, Kala"

You say that making safety unconscious leads to negligent discharges. I believe the opposite to be true. The fact that safety becomes a habit, means that it is ingrained. I feel odd if I start to walk toward my target without having opened the action. I can't do it. If I actually had to think about it, I might forget something. Not that I am perfect. The last perfect person I know of died at 33 for all of us. However, I feel similar to clasping my hands the opposite way if I break habits. I doubt I'll ever be able to ride a motorcycle without a helmet, because I learned that putting it on was a part of riding.

The part about weapons not killing is simple fact. I have yet to see a knife, bow, car, or gun kill someone. I have SEEN people die from other people using them though. A car bomb makes a great example.

I have gotten beyond the point where I tell my kids what they have done wrong most of the time. I can ask and they can figure it out. Sometimes just a quiet hint is all it takes to drive the habit into a child's bones. Yes they are still kids. They NEVER hand me a loaded gun. The bolt being forward would have been right after getting out of my gun cabinet, but I don't take a gun with the bolt forward, not even from my armorer.

And yes if safety is not ingrained you do need more teaching. I have said no one is perfect, but good habits with the use of anything are a necessity.
 
And that is the reason safety should be by instinct not coersion.

Safety is learned, not instinctive. If you teach your children how to handle something or do something safely and then reinforce it they can learn it and turn it into habit.

Not speeding becomes a habit that is safer than speeding. Not driving while distracted (cell phone, texting, arguing, reaching into the back,...putting on your makeup drinking your Big Gulp of Vodka Sunrise) becomes a habit and is safer than driving distracted. Driving with or without a seatbelt becomes habit that improves your safety. They're not instinctive, but through being taught the hazards of this one activity they can be turned into good habits that lead to safe behavior.

Good habits, not instinct is what helps keep us safe when dealing with any hazard. To develop good habits they have to be taught and reinforced. To be reinforced they have to be consistently followed and when they aren't the failure needs to be discussed, the habit retrained the safe behavior reinforced. Sometimes the failure to follow the habit of behaving safely with certain activities can lead to such catastrophic consequences that the person who hasn't turned that conscious safe behavior into unconscious habit needs to be prohibited from engaging in the activity to keep them and others safe. That usually only is reserved where permanent disabling injury or death is the consequence. That is the case with firearms. Failure to handle them safely can lead to permanent disabling injury or death and failure to exhibit safe behavior should be treated as most serious.

Since your children sound like they are safe with firearms it is probably because you trained them well by making sure they understood the hazards around them and that you then reinforced the safe behavior so they would develop good habits. The fact that they still err and you don't seem to explain the nature of the error means that they are not instinctively safe nor have they developed the unconscious habits to make them as safe as you assume your will has made them.

While I agree that the way to make kids safe with firearms (or knives, or tools, or many things) is to make them familiar with them, to train them in all the ways required to handle them safely, to reinforce that training so that it becomes conscious practice and then unconscious habit, but don't assume that retraining on particular elements isn't needed nor that reinforcement shouldn't be clearly communicated instead of assuming that a raised eyebrow alone communicates enough detail.
 
To address your concerns about other kids in our house. We deal with that since kids like to show off, by simply removing the bolts or locking the Rossi. Nice and simple and the kids can only beat each other with them after that.
 
When I was in high school in a small Texas town in the early to mid 1970s a lot of the kids who lived on area ranches always carried a rifle or shotgun in their truck; usually hanging in a rack in the back window. They were allowed to have them at school as long as they left them in the truck. It was in the school rules handbook. The local LEOs knew them and their parents and never hassled them about carrying a gun around either. These kids grew up with guns and respected them.
I took the time to teach my kids about guns and they are very unlikely to do something dumb with one because they've used them and understand that they are a big responsibility. They don't have any curiosity about them (unless my wife or I walk in the door with a new one!) because they're familiar with them. I think that's a whole lot safer than trying to hide them from the kids because they WILL find them and are far more likely to do something very dangerous if they don't know what they're doing or what firearms are capable of.
As for young kids keeping guns in their room I guess that's a judgment call for the parents to make. My oldest daughter who is still at home, 18, has kept a .357 revolver stashed in her room since she was 15 or 16. She knows how to use it too. She's one of the most level headed teenagers I've ever met and I have never worried about her keeping that gun in her room. I feel a lot better with her having it than I would if she didn't. My youngest daughter knows guns but hasn't demonstrated sufficient responsibility/maturity/judgment yet for me to allow her to keep a gun in her room, especially since she has friends over a lot who may not know a darn thing, or whose parents might raise a ruckus if their kiddo came home and announced that their friend has a firearm in her bedroom, or even told them she keeps one there. She doesn't know big sis has a revolver in her bedroom either. On those very rare occasions when the youngest is left home alone, rarely for more than 20 or 30 minutes, I give her my SKS because it's her favorite long gun, she's shot it a lot and can hit her target, and frankly, she's a lousy shot with a handgun. I don't worry about her having the SKS for short periods, but I don't feel she's ready to keep a gun in her room yet, even unloaded. I explained my reasons for not letting her have her own gun to her not long ago and also why she is almost never left home alone and she said she understood and agreed she needs to grow up some. That took me by surprise, and impressed me as well.
 
Safety is learned, not instinctive. If you teach your children how to handle something or do something safely and then reinforce it they can learn it and turn it into habit.

Not speeding becomes a habit that is safer than speeding. Not driving while distracted (cell phone, texting, arguing, reaching into the back,...putting on your makeup drinking your Big Gulp of Vodka Sunrise) becomes a habit and is safer than driving distracted. Driving with or without a seatbelt becomes habit that improves your safety. They're not instinctive, but through being taught the hazards of this one activity they can be turned into good habits that lead to safe behavior.

Good habits, not instinct is what helps keep us safe when dealing with any hazard. To develop good habits they have to be taught and reinforced. To be reinforced they have to be consistently followed and when they aren't the failure needs to be discussed, the habit retrained the safe behavior reinforced. Sometimes the failure to follow the habit of behaving safely with certain activities can lead to such catastrophic consequences that the person who hasn't turned that conscious safe behavior into unconscious habit needs to be prohibited from engaging in the activity to keep them and others safe. That usually only is reserved where permanent disabling injury or death is the consequence. That is the case with firearms. Failure to handle them safely can lead to permanent disabling injury or death and failure to exhibit safe behavior should be treated as most serious.

Since your children sound like they are safe with firearms it is probably because you trained them well by making sure they understood the hazards around them and that you then reinforced the safe behavior so they would develop good habits. The fact that they still err and you don't seem to explain the nature of the error means that they are not instinctively safe nor have they developed the unconscious habits to make them as safe as you assume your will has made them.

While I agree that the way to make kids safe with firearms (or knives, or tools, or many things) is to make them familiar with them, to train them in all the ways required to handle them safely, to reinforce that training so that it becomes conscious practice and then unconscious habit, but don't assume that retraining on particular elements isn't needed nor that reinforcement shouldn't be clearly communicated instead of assuming that a raised eyebrow alone communicates enough detail.
You have me there. Sorry. You are right "instinct" was poor choice for wording.

But since the worst thing my kids have done since I put there guns in their rooms is to knock them down once while playing, I think they are plenty safe. I dropped my M-4 yesterday in the chow hall after all. In both cases the weapons were cleared before and during the correcting of the the situation. I still have another person clear my weapons before storing them. A habit I passed down to them by having them show me a clear weapon. I don't have to ask anymore they just do it.

If a lesson in habits is required. I do give it, but this country has slid far by figuring things out for others. Giving them a chance- which is generally all that is needed- and requiring effort in figuring out some things will only benefit today's youth.
 
When some one says that they unconsciously handle their guns safely I would say that they have built safety into their behavior to a degree that it is indeed instinctive.

What's to criticize about that?
 
My son has two rifles, a Ruger 10-15 and a S&W MP15-22. He is very good about guns and safe handling. However, I don't know that the same is true of some of his friends. Therefore, his guns are accessible to him but they are not in his room. Ammunition is locked up, not because I don't trust my son, but because I don't want a lawsuit because some kid did something he shouldn't.

As to the whole "life is sanitized for your protection" thing, lawyers wouldn't be making big bucks from product liability if people were willing to accept responsibility for their own mistakes. Politicians see political power in pandering to those who believe every one of life's misfortunes are somebody else's fault or who refuse to exercise common sense. As Pogo said, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
 
I grew up with guns and ammo in my room. I could go out behind the house and hunt/shoot as I wished. I took NRA safety classes and shooting courses as a child. I was a safe kid with my stuff. When alone. When my buddies came over things sometimes changed. We were safe most of the time, but I will admit we did stupid things with guns on occassion. Nobody got hurt, but I think we were lucky. One 14 year-old boy can be extremey responsible, yet be a total idiot when with other 14 year-olds boys. Human nature (especially with boys). Same thing with kids and cars. Same thing with teenagers and alcohol. If you were different when young, you are probably the exception to the rule.

Fast forward a couple of decades when my children were young. Our guns stayed in the safe, unloaded. The safe was unlocked when I was home and locked when I was gone. When I was home, they could access any gun they wanted and go shoot out back. No big deal. They did (and still do as adults) handle guns safely. I trusted them, but kept the stuff locked up when gone because I was more worried about their friends curiousity, lack of gun knowledge, and the very strong powers of peer pressure.

At one point my daughter challenged me to give her the safe combination, saying if I didn't it meant I didn't trust her. I said I trusted her, but didn't know about what would happen if groups of friends were over. I also told her that when her friends asked her what the combination was, I would rather her be telling the truth when she said she didn't know (rather than lying about it).

My daughter is now 26 and has her own Smith and Wesson, a gift from me. My son, 24, possesses a nice .22 bolt action and a M1 Garand, also gifts from me. He loves shooting.

Would everything have turned out the same if they had guns and ammo in their rooms? Probably. But I slept better knowing that one stupid moment wouldn't change lives forever.
 
Funny, this thread has come up. I've been going to a few different clubs holding shooting matches lately and was taken back by the OVER the TOP emphasis on safety. I have no issue with safety rules in place and RO's in place to make sure all is well. That said, I was astonished to see these clubs treating everyone there like they were morons and the ridiculous amount of policing going. One club spent 30mins alone going over every single little detail, what angle a gun can be held at, where to stand, where to walk, where the hands can be on the gun....on and on ad nauseam even though the match. This week at a "local type" practical shooting match, after a round and clearing my gun in front of the RO, In order to reholster. I (first)bring my left hand across to bussel my shirt while I holster the gun and the freakin guy goes nuts....DON"T MOVE ANYTHING UNTIL THAT GUN IS HOLSTERED....!!! on and on beyond ridiculousness.. I never cross my muzzle but pulling my shirt out of the way is a good habit I got into so as not to have material holstered with my gun..;) Getting this point across only wasted oh, about 15mins of good shooting time....
 
gdcpony,

I agree with a lot of your original post. One thing I might add is that by fostering that responsibility in your kids, you are instilling self-confidence as well, and I would not underestimate the impact that can have on a child, especially once they realize it.

I plan on taking a similar approach with my kids, though it will be tailored to the specific needs of my family. For example I plan to set some "SOPs" if you will with my family, such as clearing any weapons before entering the house, clearing a weapon as soon as you pick it up, hand it off, or recieve it. As a Marine, you know exactly what I am talking about.

I think there are some misconceptions about your comments on safety without thinking. If I understand correctly you are probably refering to something more along the lines of something that is so ingrained as practice that you couldn't do otherwise if you tried. When I hand off a weapon or recieve one, I look in the chamber and try to stick my pinkie finger into the chamber, EVERY TIME. Regardless of who handed it to me, etc. I couldn't not do it if I tried.

I do agree with some other poster's concerns, children's friends, for example. You are ultimately responsible for what happens in your house and you have developed a plan to mitigate those risks. Good for you. Despite others' misgivings you have taken positive action that many parents never even think about. So I'd say that already puts your family ahead of the game.

I hear a lot of people say that it's dangerous to allow your children access to firearms, however, most of those people will readily admit that a curious enough child has a near limitless capacity to try to get to guns anyways. I have seen first hand how access reduces curiosity to the point where the kids almost lose interest entirely. We have a couple of long guns that get leaned up in a corner in our bedroom slightly out of sight. Not only do our boys not play with them, occasionally we find toy guns stacked there as well.
 
I was a safe kid with my stuff. When alone. When my buddies came over things sometimes changed. We were safe most of the time, but I will admit we did stupid things with guns on occassion. Nobody got hurt, but I think we were lucky.

Exactly. Mountainman and BHK on this are right on this.

Unsupervised children and guns is a recipe for disaster. Kids are kids, and it only takes once. There is no benefit to the risk, the possible consequences not close to worth it. All of the anecdotes showing how this or that kid was 'safe' or got away with it doesn't change anything. They were the beneficiary of dumb luck, nothing else. Kids are unsafe by definition. Sadly so are too many adults.

Guns are different than knives, bats, vehicles. Denying this is silly. They are more far deadly, far easier to be deadly with, and will easily kill at long distance. Thats what they do and why we invented them.

Lock 'em up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top